The Risk of Postoperative Wound Complications Following the Use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy (ALEX)

July 1, 2020 updated by: James van Bastelaar, Zuyderland Medisch Centrum

The Risk of Postoperative Wound Complications Following the Use of Avelle Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy and Flap fiXation: a Pilot Study

To evaluate the risk of postoperative wound complications following the use of Avelle negative pressure wound therapy in patients undergoing mastectomy and flap fixation, which might serve as a basis for a randomized controlled trial

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale:

Patients and breast cancer surgeons are frequently confronted with complications after mastectomy. These complications are manifold and mainly consist of: surgical site infections, seroma, wound dehiscence and wound necrosis. These complications are caused by numerous variables and therefore a multifactorial approach is required. Due to extensive research over the years, insight has been gained in how to reduce the rate of surgical site infections and wound healing problems. For example, pre-operatively and intra-operatively the complication rate can partly be influenced by optimizing intrinsic patient factors before surgery and using prophylactic antibiotics (1). There is however room for improvement in the postoperative phase. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has proven to be useful in reducing wound complications in all sorts of wounds. Limited evidence has been published on NPWT after breast cancer surgery and the effect of such in reducing wound complications.

This is a pilot study to evaluate the effect of negative pressure wound therapy in reducing postoperative wound complications after mastectomy, which might serve as a basis for a randomized controlled trial..

Objective:

To evaluate the risk of postoperative wound complications following the use of Avelle negative pressure wound therapy in patients undergoing mastectomy and flap fixation, which might serve as a basis for a randomized controlled trial

Study design:

A prospective cohort will be compared to a historical control group. Fifty consecutive patients will undergo mastectomy with flap fixation using tissue glue and skin sutures, closed suction drainage AND Avelle negative pressure wound therapy.

These results will be compared to the results of a historical control group consisting of 112 patients who have undergone mastectomy with flap fixation using tissue glue and sutures and closed suction drainage and in whom negative wound pressure therapy was omitted.

Follow-up will be conducted for three months post mastectomy.

Study population:

Female patients > 18 years diagnosed with invasive breast cancer or DCIS ( ductal carcinoma in situ) with an indication to perform mastectomy.

Intervention (if applicable):

Application of Avelle negative pressure wound therapy after standard mastectomy with flap fixation and closed suction drainage.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

Patients with postoperative wound complications during the first three postoperative months.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:

Patients will be informed about the study before inclusion in the outpatient clinic. Informed consent will be obtained in the outpatient clinic a week after patients were initially informed. Postoperative check-ups will be done more frequently. Standard postoperative check-ups are planned at one week and three months. Additional study postoperative check-up will be performed at six weeks. Therefore, patients will be required to undergo one additional check-up. During out patients' visits, wound complication will be evaluated. Application of Avelle negative pressure wound therapy is expected to reduce wound complications and thereby benefit the post mastectomy wound healing process. The only potential risk for the patient is that the wound therapy would be ineffective or that the patient could develop an allergic reaction to the product. The latter is also a known risk of standard wound dressings.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

162

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Limburg
      • Sittard, Limburg, Netherlands, 6162 BG
        • Zuyderland Medisch Centrum

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Older than 18 years
  • Female sex
  • Indication for mastectomy or modified radical mastectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing breast conserving therapy
  • Patients undergoing direct breast reconstruction
  • Unable to comprehend implications and extent of study and sign for informed consent
  • Participation in other study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: No negative pressure wound therapy
Historical cohort: patients who underwent mastectomy with flap fixation using tissue glue and sutures and closed suction drainage and where negative wound pressure therapy has been omitted
Experimental: Negative pressure wound therapy
Prospective cohort: patients who underwent mastectomy with flap fixation using tissue glue and sutures and closed suction drainage with negative wound pressure therapy
Wound dressing with negative pressure on closed incisions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with post-operative wound complications
Time Frame: During the first three postoperative months

Number of patients with post-operative wound complications defined as follows:

  1. Surgical site infection (SSI) is defined as redness, pain, heat or swelling at the site of the incision or by the drainage of pus. Infection rate will be measured by A) the need for antibiotics, B) seroma aspiration due to infection or C) surgical drainage during the first three postoperative months.
  2. Wound necrosis. Defined as a wound with necrotic tissue that consists of an accumulation of dead cells, tissue and cellular debris and often requires debridement.
  3. Wound dehiscence or breakdown defined as a wound that ruptures along a surgical incision and the edges of the wound no longer align.
During the first three postoperative months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of unplanned visits to the ER or breast cancer clinic
Time Frame: During the first three postoperative months
Number of unplanned visits to the ER or breast cancer clinic. Planned visits are standard follow-up outpatient clinic visits which are defined preoperatively. Unplanned visits are defined as any visit to the outpatient clinic which is necessary due to an adverse event.
During the first three postoperative months
Number of patients with clinically significant seroma
Time Frame: During the first three postoperative months

Number of patients with clinically significant seroma. This is defined as:

  1. Wound healing is at risk due to seroma (wound break down, seroma leakage, necrosis)
  2. There is discomfort or pain caused by large amounts of seroma, characterised by tenseness of the skin.
  3. There is contaminated/ infected seroma and aspiration is necessary to treat infection. All patients that undergo seroma aspiration due to infection will also be treated with a one week course of Augmentin 625 mg 3 times daily.
During the first three postoperative months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 31, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • METCZ20190024

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Negative pressure wound therapy

Subscribe