The Use of Dental Pulp Tissue as an Autogenous Graft for Ridge Augmentation

January 19, 2022 updated by: Karo Parsegian, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
The purpose of this study is to examine and compare the effects of autogenous dental pulp tissue on bone formation in the extraction sockets as compared to commonly used particulate bone graft. The effects on bone formation will be examined using a wide variety of assays.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System ASA 1 (A normal healthy patient) or ASA 2 (A patient with mild systemic disease)
  • never smoker
  • patients with planned tooth extraction
  • intact extraction sockets
  • no medication or antibiotics intake for at least 6 months prior to the procedure
  • patients who gave their consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • vulnerable subjects (children, pregnant and lactating women, patients with learning disabilities, and prisoners)
  • inability to obtain pulp tissue (for example, due to previous endodontic therapy, obliterated pulp canals)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Particulate bone graft plus autogenous dental pulp tissue
Dental pulp will be isolated from teeth extracted for non-periodontal reasons chairside. The isolated dental pulp will be mixed with hydrated particulate bone graft, and the mixture will be placed in the debrided extraction socket. The socket will be covered by a resorbable collagen membrane and sutured.
Creos allo.gain allogenic bone particulate mineralized cortical bone will be hydrated and placed in the extraction socket.
Other Names:
  • creos allo.gain
  • allogenic bone particulates
Dental pulp will be isolated from teeth extracted for non-periodontal reasons chairside, mixed with hydrated particulate bone graft, and then placed in the extraction socket.
After placement of particulate bone graft or particulate bone graft plus autogenous dental pulp tissue, socket will be covered by a resorbable collagen membrane and sutured.
Resorbable or non-resorbable suture material
Active Comparator: Particulate bone graft
Hydrated particulate bone graft will be placed in the debrided extraction socket. The socket will be covered by a resorbable collagen membrane and sutured.
Creos allo.gain allogenic bone particulate mineralized cortical bone will be hydrated and placed in the extraction socket.
Other Names:
  • creos allo.gain
  • allogenic bone particulates
After placement of particulate bone graft or particulate bone graft plus autogenous dental pulp tissue, socket will be covered by a resorbable collagen membrane and sutured.
Resorbable or non-resorbable suture material

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Bone fill as assessed by radiograph
Time Frame: immediately after placement of bone graft
immediately after placement of bone graft
Bone fill as assessed by radiograph
Time Frame: 2 months after placement of bone graft
2 months after placement of bone graft
Bone fill as assessed by radiograph
Time Frame: 4 months after placement of bone graft
4 months after placement of bone graft

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Extent of mineralization as assessed by von Kossa staining
Time Frame: 4 months after placement of bone graft
4 months after placement of bone graft
Extent of mineralization as assessed by Xylenol Orange staining
Time Frame: 4 months after placement of bone graft
4 months after placement of bone graft
Expression of osteoblastic marker Bsp assessed by quantitative PCR (qPCR)
Time Frame: 4 months after placement of bone graft
4 months after placement of bone graft
Expression of osteoblastic marker BSP assessed by immunostaining using anti-BSP antibody
Time Frame: 4 months after placement of bone graft
4 months after placement of bone graft
Expression of osteoblastic marker Bglap assessed by quantitative PCR (qPCR)
Time Frame: 4 months after placement of bone graft
4 months after placement of bone graft
Expression of osteoblastic marker BGLAP assessed by immunostaining using anti-BGLAP antibody
Time Frame: 4 months after placement of bone graft
4 months after placement of bone graft
Expression of osteoblastic marker Dmp1 assessed by quantitative PCR (qPCR)
Time Frame: 4 months after placement of bone graft
4 months after placement of bone graft
Expression of osteoblastic marker DMP1 assessed by immunostaining using anti-DMP1 antibody
Time Frame: 4 months after placement of bone graft
4 months after placement of bone graft
Expression of osteoblastic marker Col1a1 assessed by quantitative PCR (qPCR)
Time Frame: 4 months after placement of bone graft
4 months after placement of bone graft
Expression of osteoblastic marker Sost assessed by quantitative PCR (qPCR)
Time Frame: 4 months after placement of bone graft
4 months after placement of bone graft

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karo Parsegian, DMD, MDSc, PhD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

May 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 3, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSC-DB-18-0873

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tooth Loss

Clinical Trials on Particulate bone graft

3
Subscribe