Efficacy of Arnica Montana in Reducing Postoperative Edema and Pain

January 13, 2026 updated by: Tufts University

Efficacy of Arnica Montana in Reducing Postoperative Edema and Pain Following Third Molar Extraction

This study is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled, clinical trial that evaluates the efficacy of using high potency homeopathic Arnica montana (SinEcch™) during the perioperative period for decreasing swelling and pain after extraction of partial or full/complete bony impacted third molars. The study group will be comprised of subjects who will receive homeopathic Arnica montana (SinEcch™) for perioperative management of edema and pain. The control group will be comprised of subjects who will receive matching SinEcch™ placebo (sugar pill).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Our study aims to look at the efficacy of homeopathic Arnica montana (SinEcch™) in reducing postoperative edema and pain. Pain will be measured using the visual analog scale (VAS). Swelling will be measured using a 3D imaging system. This is the first study using the 3D imaging system that looks at the effect of homeopathic Arnica montana in reducing facial swelling following the surgical removal of impacted third molars. Although SinEcch is marketed mainly for management of postoperative swelling and bruising, Arnica Montana has been used for managing the sequelae of postoperative inflammation including pain so one of the secondary outcome measure for this study is to measure the efficacy of SinEcch in management of post-operative pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

53

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
        • Tufts University School of Dental Medicine Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects of either sex and of any race from the ages of 18 to 40 years.
  • Subjects for whom a decision has been made to extract 4 third molars, and who have at least 2 of third molar teeth classified as full or partially bony impacted in the mandible, and they will be evaluated to have at least 2 of third molar teeth classified as erupted or impacted (full or partially bony) in the maxilla under local anesthesia alone, local anesthesia and sedation, or local anesthesia and general anesthesia, all in an outpatient setting.

    1. Full/complete bony: The entire tooth is below the level of the alveolar bone. The tooth is completely encased in bone so that when the gingiva is cut and reflected back, the tooth is not seen. Bone removal (large amounts) together with root sectioning will be needed to remove the tooth.
    2. Partial bony: A portion of the height of the contour of the tooth is below the level of the alveolar bone. The superficial portion of the tooth is covered only by soft tissue, but the height of the tooth's contour is below the level of the surrounding alveolar bone.
  • Subjects must be physically able to tolerate conventional surgical procedures (ASA I/II).
  • Subjects must agree to follow the study protocol as shown by signing the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who are known to be pregnant or think they may be pregnant. (A urine pregnancy test will be performed on female subjects at Day 0 - Visit 1. Subjects testing positive will be excluded from study participation.)
  • Subjects with skeletal immaturity as determined by the medical history.
  • Subjects with self-reported current or history of substance abuse.
  • Subjects who are currently receiving any anti-inflammatory or pain medication chronically, or they suffer from a chronic pain condition.
  • Subjects with an allergy to Vicodin (or its constituents, acetaminophen and hydrocodone).
  • Subjects who are diagnosed with fibromyalgia.
  • Allergy to ragweed and other related plants.
  • Subjects with an allergy to hypromellose.
  • Non-English speaking patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Study Group
The study group will be comprised of subjects who will receive homeopathic Arnica montana (SinEcch™) for perioperative management of edema and pain.
The study group will be comprised of subjects who will receive homeopathic Arnica montana (SinEcch™) for perioperative management of edema and pain.
Other Names:
  • Arnica montana
Placebo Comparator: Control Group
The control group will be comprised of subjects who will receive matching SinEcch™ placebo (sugar pill).
The control group will be comprised of subjects who will receive matching SinEcch™ placebo (sugar pill).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Postoperative Facial Swelling From Baseline to Day 3
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 3
Primary outcome is the change in postoperative facial swelling volume as measured by the 3dMD™ system
Baseline and Day 3
Change in Postoperative Facial Swelling From Day 3 to Day 5
Time Frame: Day 3 and Day 5
Primary outcome is the change in postoperative facial swelling volume as measured by the 3dMD™ system
Day 3 and Day 5
Change in Postoperative Facial Swelling From Baseline to Day 5
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 5
Primary outcome is the change in postoperative facial swelling volume as measured by the 3dMD™ system
Baseline and Day 5

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Post Operative Pain From Baseline to Day 3
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 3
Change in postoperative pain as measured by 0-100 mm Visual Analog Scale, from baseline to post-operative Day 3, and from baseline to post-operative Day 5 (0 being the least pain, 100 being the most pain)
Baseline and Day 3
Change in Post Operative Pain From Baseline to Day 5
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 5
Change in postoperative pain as measured by 0-100 mm Visual Analog Scale, from baseline to post-operative Day 3, and from baseline to post-operative Day 5 (0 being the least pain, 100 being the most pain)
Baseline and Day 5

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 26, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 14, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 14, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 12692

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Third Molar Extraction

Subscribe