The Immediate Effects of Dry Needling on Post-concussion Syndrome

November 5, 2020 updated by: Dr. Margo Mountjoy, University of Guelph
In about 15% of adult concussion cases, symptoms last longer than 2 weeks and can largely impact the individual's ability to work, be physically active and participate in everyday life. These symptoms are often partially related to unresolved neck muscle tightness and other neck-related symptoms. Dry needling is a technique that uses acupuncture needles to release muscle knots, decrease neck muscle tightness and decrease neck pain. As far as the investigators are aware, there have been no studies looking at the effects of dry needling on symptoms of chronic concussion. This study will compare the effects of dry needling to traditional hands-on physiotherapy treatment of the neck for concussion-related symptoms. Participants with chronic concussion symptoms will receive either dry needling, hands-on manual physiotherapy or both. Concussion symptoms, symptom severity, neck range of motion and pain with pressure over neck muscles will be compared before and after treatment, and the day after treatment. The investigators expect that the greatest improvement in all of these will be seen in the group receiving both interventions, both immediately after treatment and the following day. If dry needling can immediately improve concussion symptoms, patients may better tolerate therapeutic exercise and experience quicker resolution of chronic symptoms.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Detailed Description

All participants will be tested in clinic once, for approximately a half hour. For all groups, outcome measures relating to concussion symptoms, cervical range of motion and pain pressure thresholds will be taken prior to and after the intervention.

In the DN group, four muscles (upper fibres trapezius, cervical multifidus, levator scapulae and suboccipitals) will be palpated by a physiotherapist trained in dry needling. If a palpable trigger point is found, the physiotherapist will perform dry needling until a local twitch response is elicited. If a trigger point is not found, no dry needling will take place. In this way, up to 8 total muscles will be needled during the session. The participant will be in prone for the above procedure.

In the MT group, soft tissue release will be performed on the above four muscles bilaterally. Cervical traction (unilateral grade 3 oscillatory distraction technique, any cervical segment between C0/C1 and C7/C7, 3-5 sets of 30 seconds) and mobilization (unilateral inferior-medial-posterior or superior-anterior-lateral, grade 3 oscillatory, any cervical segment between C0/C1 and C7/C7, 3-5 sets of 30 seconds ) will also be performed if the physiotherapist deems it necessary, specific to the spinal level noted to be involved. In the DN+MT group, MT interventions will be performed first, followed by DN, of the four above muscles. Immediately following intervention, the outcome measures will all be re-tested. The participants will also be instructed to fill out the SCAT-5 Step 2 upon waking the next morning. Additionally, if one or more of the cervical motions caused pain during initial testing, they will be asked to repeat the motion and report the current level of pain on the VAS scale.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Elora, Ontario, Canada, N0B1S0
        • Eramosa Physiotherapy - Elora
      • Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1E6R2
        • Eramosa Physiotherapy - Bullfrog Mall
      • Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G2W1
        • Health and Performance Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • experiencing concussion symptoms at least 4 weeks following an external impact injury to the head

Exclusion Criteria:

  • medical diagnoses of depression and/or anxiety
  • skull fractures
  • subdural or epidural haematomas
  • parenchymal bleeds
  • recent infection
  • vascular anomaly
  • hypertension
  • current or past smoker
  • high cholesterol
  • family history of stroke
  • migraine
  • malignant/inflammatory disease
  • osteoporosis
  • bleeding disorde
  • damaged heart valves
  • pacemaker or other electrical implants
  • fear of needles

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dry Needling
Participants will receive dry needling of the following muscles as indicated: upper fibres trapezius, levator scapulae, cervical multifidus, suboccipitals.
Comparison between dry needling and/or manual therapy of the cervical region.
Other Names:
  • Intramuscular Stimulation (Gunn IMS)
  • Integrated Dry Needling (IDN)
Active Comparator: Dry Needling + Manual Therapy
Participants will receive dry needling of the following muscles as indicated: upper fibres trapezius, levator scapulae, cervical multifidus, suboccipitals IN ADDITION TO manual therapy of the above muscles and/or cervical joint traction and/or mobilization as indicated.
Comparison between dry needling and/or manual therapy of the cervical region.
Other Names:
  • Intramuscular Stimulation (Gunn IMS)
  • Integrated Dry Needling (IDN)
soft tissue release, cervical traction and/or cervical mobilization
Active Comparator: Manual Therapy
Participants will receive manual therapy of the following muscles as indicated: upper fibres trapezius, levator scapulae, cervical multifidus, suboccipitals and/or cervical joint traction and/or mobilization as indicated.
soft tissue release, cervical traction and/or cervical mobilization

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline Sport Concussion Assessment Tool v5 (SCAT-5) symptom score, immediately after intervention
Time Frame: within 10 minutes of intervention
Symptom numeric rating tool validated for concussion patients, 22 listed symptoms that are either present (scored 1) or absent (scored 0), minimum = 0 (good outcome), maximum = 22 (poor outcome)
within 10 minutes of intervention
Change from baseline Sport Concussion Assessment Tool v5 (SCAT-5) symptom score, 12-24 hours after intervention
Time Frame: 12-24 hours after intervention
Symptom numeric rating tool validated for concussion patients, 22 listed symptoms that are either present (scored 1) or absent (scored 0), minimum = 0 (good outcome), maximum = 22 (poor outcome)
12-24 hours after intervention
Change from baseline Sport Concussion Assessment Tool v5 (SCAT-5) symptom severity, immediately after intervention
Time Frame: within 10 minutes of intervention
Symptom numeric rating tool validated for concussion patients, 22 listed symptoms that are scored from 0 (absent) to 6 (worst imaginable), minimum = 0 (good outcome), maximum = 132 (poor outcome)
within 10 minutes of intervention
Change from baseline Sport Concussion Assessment Tool v5 (SCAT-5) symptom severity, 12-24 hours after intervention
Time Frame: 12-24 hours after intervention
Symptom numeric rating tool validated for concussion patients, 22 listed symptoms that are scored from 0 (absent) to 6 (worst imaginable), minimum = 0 (good outcome), maximum = 132 (poor outcome)
12-24 hours after intervention
Change in baseline Cervical Range of Motion, immediately after intervention
Time Frame: within 10 minutes of intervention
Cervical Active Range in flexion, extension, bilateral side flexion, bilateral rotation, measured in degrees using a CROM (Cervical Range of Motion) tool that measures multidirectional movement, each of the 6 ranges will be reported on their own in degrees and the 6 will also be added together for a total range measurement in degrees
within 10 minutes of intervention
Change in baseline pain score with Cervical Range of Motion, immediately after intervention
Time Frame: within 10 minutes of intervention
Pain Rating Scale at end of range flexion, extension, bilateral side flexion, bilateral rotation (as measured in Outcome 5), scored 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain imaginable), 0 = best outcome, 10 = worst outcome, total score for all 6 movements will be computed out of 60 (0=best, 60=worst)
within 10 minutes of intervention
Change in baseline pain score with Cervical Range of Motion, 12-24 hours after intervention
Time Frame: 12-24 hours after intervention
Pain Rating Scale at end of range flexion, extension, bilateral side flexion, bilateral rotation (as measured in Outcome 5), scored 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain imaginable), 0 = best outcome, 10 = worst outcome, total score for all 6 movements will be computed out of 60 (0=best, 60=worst)
12-24 hours after intervention
Change in baseline of Pain Pressure Threshold (the smallest amount of pressure that evokes pain) as measured using a pressure algometer, immediately after baseline
Time Frame: within 10 minutes of intervention
The pressure algometer is applied to the test muscle (in this case bilateral upper fibres trapezius, levator scapulae, suboccipital group and cervical multifidus at the base of the neck) and pressure is applied incrementally until pain is reported, the outcome is the least amount of pressure (in kilograms) applied over a muscle that evokes pain (lowest = 0 kg, higher values are better outcomes)
within 10 minutes of intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Margo Mountjoy, MD, Adjunct Professor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 5, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

November 5, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-Concussive Syndrome, Chronic

Clinical Trials on Dry Needling

Subscribe