- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02352532
Using Structural Health Monitoring to Improve Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Injury in U.S. Service Members- Phase 2 (SWE/DN)
The focus of this project is to evaluate the diagnostic utility of Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) in individuals after routine low back injury and begin an initial investigation of it's ability to effectively guide physical therapy treatment with dry-needling as a relevant treatment intervention.
Specific Aim #1: Evaluate the diagnostic utility of SWE in differentiating individuals with and without LBP. The investigators will also examine the interaction between tissue change and clinical improvement. The investigators hypothesize that individuals with LBP will have higher muscle stiffness (shear modulus) at rest and impaired (lower) stiffness during contraction than individuals without LBP.
Specific Aim #2: Evaluate the effectiveness of dry-needling in decreasing aberrant muscle stiffness in individuals with LBP. The investigators hypothesize that individuals with LBP that receive dry-needling will exhibit larger changes than both individuals with LBP that receive sham dry-needling and than individuals without LBP that receive dry-needling.
Specific Aim #3: Evaluate the effectiveness of dry-needling in decreasing pain and disability in individuals with LBP. The investigators hypothesize that individuals with LBP that receive dry-needling will exhibit larger improvements than individuals with LBP that receive sham dry-needling.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Low back pain (LBP) is the second most frequent reason for health care visits and a leading cause of medical evacuation from theater. Traditional medical diagnosis based on static imaging strategies (e.g. MRI) has failed to improve management of this epidemic. Functional assessment of lumbar musculature using ultrasound imaging provides evidence of clinically relevant deficits in the lumbar multifidus (LM) muscle of patients with LBP, however such procedures are likely only valid within a narrow range of assessment conditions. Shear-Wave Elastography (SWE) is an evolving non-invasive ultrasound imaging technology capable of quantifying tissue stiffness (i.e., elasticity). Originally developed to improve diagnosis of soft tissue tumors, SWE is beginning to be used to as an alternative and more stable method of functional assessment of muscles.
This study will be the second project in a line of research aimed at improving the diagnosis, management, and treatment of patients with LBP using a new structural health monitoring technique called shear wave elastography (SWE). Since no previous studies had used SWE in the lumbar multifidus muscle, the initial project developed the measurement technique to be used with this device. We also established normative parameters, variance, and reliability estimates of SWE outcomes in asymptomatic individuals. A previous study, also performed at AMEDDC&S, found that individuals with LBP whom received dry needling to the lumbar multifidus muscle exhibited a reduction in pain and disability that was associated with an improved ability to contract the lumbar multifidus. The focus of this second project is to evaluate the diagnostic utility of SWE in individuals after routine low back injury and begin an initial investigation of it's ability to effectively guide physical therapy treatment with dry-needling as a relevant treatment intervention.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States, 78209
- Army Medical Department Center and Schools
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Between the age of 18 - 65 years
- Read and speak English well enough to provide informed consent and follow study instructions
- Active duty military or DOD beneficiary
- History of prior surgery to the lumbosacral spine
- Received manual therapy, acupuncture, or dry-needling interventions to the lumbosacral spine within the past 4 weeks
- Currently taking anticoagulant medications or those individuals with a medical history of bleeding disorder
- History of systemic inflammatory disease or other serious spinal pathology (e.g. annular tears of the intervertebral disc, spinal stenosis, fracture)
- Known pregnancy and/or inability to lie prone and fully elevate bilateral arms
- Presence of neurogenic LBP defined by either a positive ipsilateral or contralateral straight leg raise (reproduction of symptoms at <45°) or reflex, sensation, or strength deficits in a pattern consistent with nerve root compression
- Medical "red flags" of a potentially serious condition including cauda equina syndrome, major or rapidly progressing neurological deficit, fracture, cancer, infection, or systemic disease
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of prior surgery to the lumbosacral spine
- Received manual therapy, acupuncture, or dry-needling interventions to the lumbosacral spine within the past 4 weeks
- Currently taking anticoagulant medications or those individuals with a medical history of bleeding disorder
- History of systemic inflammatory disease or other serious spinal pathology (e.g. annular tears of the intervertebral disc, spinal stenosis, fracture)
- Known pregnancy and/or inability to lie prone and fully elevate bilateral arms
- Presence of neurogenic LBP defined by either a positive ipsilateral or contralateral straight leg raise (reproduction of symptoms at <45°) or reflex, sensation, or strength deficits in a pattern consistent with nerve root compression
- Medical "red flags" of a potentially serious condition including cauda equina syndrome, major or rapidly progressing neurological deficit, fracture, cancer, infection, or systemic disease
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Low Back Pain - Dry Needling
|
The dry-needling treatment will consist of inserting a sterile needle into needling the prone participant's lumbar multifidus and paraspinal muscles, 1-2 times each, in regions of local tenderness to palpation and/or regions with palpable trigger points.
All needling treatment will be performed with FDA approved (FDA regulation # 880.5580) disposable 0.30 x 50-60 mm stainless steel Seirin J-type needles (Seirin, Japan).
Each needle insertion will last approximately 5 seconds using a "pistoning" (in and out) technique.
Other Names:
|
Sham Comparator: Low Back Pain - Sham
|
The sham dry-needling procedure will mimic the dry needling procedures by placing a sharp object in a needling guide tube against the skin (see figure).
The sharp object will be rocked and twisted to simulate treatment, but will not pierce the skin.
We have used this sham dry-needling technique in a previous study performed at AMEDDC&S and have found it to be indistinguishable from real dry needling by the great majority of participants.
|
Active Comparator: Asymmptomatic - Dry Needling
|
The dry-needling treatment will consist of inserting a sterile needle into needling the prone participant's lumbar multifidus and paraspinal muscles, 1-2 times each, in regions of local tenderness to palpation and/or regions with palpable trigger points.
All needling treatment will be performed with FDA approved (FDA regulation # 880.5580) disposable 0.30 x 50-60 mm stainless steel Seirin J-type needles (Seirin, Japan).
Each needle insertion will last approximately 5 seconds using a "pistoning" (in and out) technique.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in muscle stiffness and activation utilizing shear-wave elastography after dry needling - one week follow-up
Time Frame: 7 days
|
SWE images of the lumbar multifidus and paraspinal muscles will be acquired at rest and during sub-maximal isometric contraction.
All SWE images will be obtained using a Supersonic Aixplorer ultrasound system with a 50mm 10-2 MHz linear array.
The sub-maximal contraction of the lumbar multifidus will be elicited by a contralateral arm lift maneuver while holding a small hand weight following techniques outlined in our previous work.42
The weight used will depend on the participant's body weight and will elicit approximately 30% of the MVC of the lumbar multifidus muscle as previously shown by fine wire EMG.43 Participants weighing less than 68 kg (150 lbs) will use .68
kg (1.5 lbs), those between 68-90 kg (150-200 lbs) will use .91
kg (2 lbs), and those greater than 91 kg (200 lbs) will use 1.36 kg (3 lbs).
Participants will be instructed as follows: "lift your arm approximately 2 inches (5 cm) off the table".
|
7 days
|
Change in pain pressure threshold utilizing pressure algometry after dry needling
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
Pressure algometry will used in the current study to determine the most painful spinal level at baseline and as a secondary outcome measure, pain pressure threshold (PPT), to assess abnormalities in nociceptive processing or hyperalgisia 37,38. PPT measures have been found to be highly reliable,39-41 especially when taken by the same rater (ICC=0.94-.097) 40. A digital pressure algometer (Wagner Force Ten FDX, Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, CT) will be used to measure PPT in the lumbar multifidus and paraspinal muscles on the side that the participant reported as more symptomatic. The pressure algometer will held by the examiner directly perpendicular to the muscle belly, approximately 1.5 cm lateral to the spinous process. The algometer will be advanced at a rate of approximately 5N/sec. and participants are instructed to verbally signal when they first perceive the force exerted as painful. PPT at each location will taken three times and averaged to reduce variability. Pressure |
5 minutes
|
Change in muscle stiffness and activation utilizing shear-wave elastography after dry needling.
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
SWE images of the lumbar multifidus and paraspinal muscles will be acquired at rest and during sub-maximal isometric contraction.
All SWE images will be obtained using a Supersonic Aixplorer ultrasound system with a 50mm 10-2 MHz linear array.
The sub-maximal contraction of the lumbar multifidus will be elicited by a contralateral arm lift maneuver while holding a small hand weight following techniques outlined in our previous work.42
The weight used will depend on the participant's body weight and will elicit approximately 30% of the MVC of the lumbar multifidus muscle as previously shown by fine wire EMG.43 Participants weighing less than 68 kg (150 lbs) will use .68
kg (1.5 lbs), those between 68-90 kg (150-200 lbs) will use .91
kg (2 lbs), and those greater than 91 kg (200 lbs) will use 1.36 kg (3 lbs).
Participants will be instructed as follows: "lift your arm approximately 2 inches (5 cm) off the table".
|
5 minutes
|
Change in pain pressure threshold utilizing pressure algometry after dry needling - 1 week follow-up
Time Frame: 7 days
|
SWE images of the lumbar multifidus and paraspinal muscles will be acquired at rest and during sub-maximal isometric contraction.
All SWE images will be obtained using a Supersonic Aixplorer ultrasound system with a 50mm 10-2 MHz linear array.
The sub-maximal contraction of the lumbar multifidus will be elicited by a contralateral arm lift maneuver while holding a small hand weight following techniques outlined in our previous work.42
The weight used will depend on the participant's body weight and will elicit approximately 30% of the MVC of the lumbar multifidus muscle as previously shown by fine wire EMG.43 Participants weighing less than 68 kg (150 lbs) will use .68
kg (1.5 lbs), those between 68-90 kg (150-200 lbs) will use .91
kg (2 lbs), and those greater than 91 kg (200 lbs) will use 1.36 kg (3 lbs).
Participants will be instructed as follows: "lift your arm approximately 2 inches (5 cm) off the table".
|
7 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Numerical Pain Rating Scale
Time Frame: 7 days
|
The numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) will be used to assess the participant's pain levels.
The participant will grade his/her pain on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).The NPRS has been shown to be a reliable, generalizable, and internally consistent measure of clinical and experimental pain intensity in individuals with musculoskeletal disorders.33,34
A 2-point change on the NPRS is required to be clinically meaningful.
|
7 days
|
Change in function and disability utilizing a physical exam
Time Frame: 7 days
|
Participants with current LBP will undergo a standardized clinical examination based the Treatment Based Classification System.31
Patients without current LBP will undergo an abbreviated examination primarily focused on sociodemographic
|
7 days
|
Change in Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 7 days
|
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a LBP-specific subjective measure of disability.
Users are asked to rate the difficulty of performing 10 functional tasks on a scale of 0 to 5 with different descriptors for each task.
A total score out of 100 is calculated by summing each score and doubling the total.
The answers provide a score between 0 and 100, with higher scores representing more disability.
It has been shown to have excellent test-retest reliability (ICC2,1=.90),
good validity, and superior responsiveness compared to other leading disability scales.32
|
7 days
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Global Rate of Change
Time Frame: 7 days
|
The global rating of change (GRC) assesses subjective perception of overall change and the importance of that change.
A 15-point Likert type scale ranging from -7 (very great deal worse) to +7 (a very great deal better) and a 6-point Likert type scale ranging from 1 (a tiny bit important) to 6 (a very great important) will be used.
|
7 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- #10586012
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de...CompletedLow Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, Postural | Lower Back Pain Chronic | Low Back Pain, Posterior CompartmentBrazil
-
University School of Physical Education in WroclawCompletedLow Back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, PosturalPoland
-
Texas Woman's UniversityTexas Physical Therapy AssociationCompletedLow Back Pain | Chronic Low Back Pain | Subacute Low Back PainUnited States
-
University of ParmaKing's College London; Helmholtz Zentrum München; GENOS; Ip Research Consulting... and other collaboratorsUnknownChronic Low Back Pain | Acute Low Back PainUnited States, Australia, Belgium, Croatia, Italy, United Kingdom
-
Ache Laboratorios Farmaceuticos S.A.Unknown
-
Palmer College of ChiropracticDepartment of Health and Human ServicesCompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Subacute Low Back PainUnited States
-
Universität Duisburg-EssenSiemens-BetriebskrankenkasseCompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Recurrent Low Back Pain
-
Karolinska InstitutetCompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Recurrent Low Back Pain | Persistent Low Back PainSweden
-
Apsen Farmaceutica S.A.CompletedLow Back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Acute Low Back PainBrazil
Clinical Trials on Dry Needling
-
Brigham Young UniversityUnknownMyofascial Pain Syndrome | Myofascial Trigger Point PainUnited States
-
Army-Baylor University Doctoral Program in Physical...Brooke Army Medical CenterCompletedChronic Pain | Shoulder Pain | Musculoskeletal InjuryUnited States
-
Youngstown State UniversityRecruiting
-
Universidad de ZaragozaCompleted
-
Institute of Technology, CarlowCompleted
-
Universidad de ZaragozaUnknownHip OsteoarthritisSpain
-
Universitat Internacional de CatalunyaRecruitingMyofascial Trigger Point PainSpain
-
University of HaifaCompleted
-
Texas Woman's UniversityActive, not recruitingShoulder Pain | Dry NeedlingUnited States
-
Duke UniversityEnrolling by invitationShoulder Pain | Frozen Shoulder | Shoulder Adhesive CapsulitisUnited States