Effects and Prognostic Factors of Intensive Pulse Light Treatment for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

May 9, 2022 updated by: tae-young chung, Samsung Medical Center
The investigators are going to Investigate the comparative efficacy of intense pulsed light therapy alone with that of intense pulsed light plus meibomian gland expression for meibomian gland dysfunction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Enrolled patients are going to be randomly assigned to two groups. All of the patients will undergo four treatment sessions in total, which are two weeks apart. Group 1 will undergo two sessions of intense pulsed light therapy with meibomian gland expression, as well as two sessions of intense pulsed light alone. Group 2 will receive two sessions of intense pulsed light therapy alone, and two sessions of intense pulsed light therapy with meibomian gland expression. The following parameters will be measured at baseline, 2 weeks after the second treatment session, and 2 weeks after the fourth treatment session: tearfilm break-up time, Oxford grade for corneal staining, meibomian gland expressibility, meibum quality, and ocular surface disease index.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

81

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Clinical diagnosis of meibomian gland dysfunction

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical conditions in which IPL is contraindicated (pregnancy, breastfeeding, lupus, and any major uncontrolled health problem).
  • Contact lens wearer
  • Previous ocular surgery
  • Previous thermal treatment for dry eye disease (e.g. LipiFlow)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1
IPL therapy will be performed with the M22® (Lumenis, Dreieich, Germany). IPL treatment is going to be administered to the skin below the lower eyelid. Before treatment, the eyes will be protected with opaque goggles. Ultrasound gel is going to be applied to the patient's face from tragus to tragus including the nose in order to conduct the light, help to spread the energy evenly, and provide a degree of protection. The intensity of the IPL treatment will range from 9.8J/cm2 to 13J/cm2 according to Fitzpatrick Skin Type Grading.
IPL therapy will be performed with the M22® (Lumenis, Dreieich, Germany). IPL treatment is going to be administered to the skin below the lower eyelid. Before treatment, the eyes will be protected with opaque goggles. Ultrasound gel is going to be applied to the patient's face from tragus to tragus including the nose in order to conduct the light, help to spread the energy evenly, and provide a degree of protection. The intensity of the IPL treatment will range from 9.8J/cm2 to 13J/cm2 according to Fitzpatrick Skin Type Grading.
Other Names:
  • Meibomian gland expression

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline tearfilm break-up time at 2 weeks after the last treatment session
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 weeks after the last treatment session
Baseline and 2 weeks after the last treatment session
Change from baseline Oxford grade for corneal staining at 2 weeks after the last treatment session
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 weeks after the last treatment session
Oxford grade for staining was assessed on a scale of 0 to 5. It was scaled according to the degree of corneal staining as follow: 0 (absent), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (marked), and 5 (severe)
Baseline and 2 weeks after the last treatment session
Change from baseline meibomian gland expressibility score at 2 weeks after the last treatment session
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 weeks after the last treatment session
The meibomian gland expressibility was assessed on a scale of 0 to 3 in five glands on the central lower lid. It was scaled according to the number of glands expressible, as follows: 0 (all glands), 1 (three to four glands), 2 (one to two glands) and 3 (no glands)
Baseline and 2 weeks after the last treatment session
Change from baseline meibum quality score at 2 weeks after the last treatment session
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 weeks after the last treatment session
The meibum quality score were divided into the following four degrees: 0 (clear), 1 (cloudy), 2 (granular), and 3 (toothpaste)
Baseline and 2 weeks after the last treatment session
Change from baseline ocular surface disease index at 2 weeks after the last treatment session
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 weeks after the last treatment session
The ocular surface diseases index score range from 0 to 100 based on the result of standardized ocular surface disease index questionnaire. Higher value represent worse subjective symptom.
Baseline and 2 weeks after the last treatment session

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 18, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 18, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019-04-066

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Clinical Trials on Intense Pulsed Light (IPL)

Subscribe