Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Two Regimens of Crisaborole Ointment 2% in Japanese Participants Aged ≥2 Years With Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis

July 5, 2020 updated by: Pfizer

A Phase 2b, Multi Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Intra-Participant Study, to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Two Regimens of Crisaborole Ointment 2% in Japanese Pediatric and Adult Participants (2 Years and Older) With Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis

This is a Phase 2b, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, intraparticipant study to evaluate efficacy and safety of two regimens of crisaborole ointment 2% in Japanese pediatric and adult participants (cohort 1: 12 years and older, cohort 2: 2 to under 12 years old) with mild to moderate Atopic Dermatitis (AD).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

81

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Osaka
      • Osaka-shi, Osaka, Japan, 532-0003
        • Medical Corporation Heishinkai OPHAC Hospital
    • Tokyo
      • Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 103-0027
        • Fukuwa Clinic
      • Toshima-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 171-0014
        • Sekino Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 months and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female participants ages; Cohort 1: 12 years and older at the time of consent. Cohort 2: 2 years to under 12 years old at the time of consent.
  • Has confrimed clinical diagnosis of active AD according to Hanifin and Rajka criteria and has at least 6 months history prior to screening and has been clinically stable for more than 1 month
  • Has at least 1% and no more than 30% BSA at baseline/Day1, excluding scalp, genitals and groin area
  • Has a Investigator's static global assessment (ISGA) score of Mild (2) or Moderate (3) on Day 1.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has other acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition including recent (within the past year) or active suicidal ideation or behavior or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or investigational product administration or may interfere with the interpretation of study results and, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the participant inappropriate for entry into this study.
  • Participants had previous treatment with any topical or systemic PDE-4 inhibitor.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Crisaborole ointment 2% once daily (QD) vs vehicle QD
intra-participant comparison, treatment will be randomly assigned to target lesion 1 and lesion 2.
BID regimen
BID regimen
QD regimen
QD regimen
Experimental: Crisaborole ointment 2% twice daily (BID) vs vehicle BID
Intra-participant comparison, treatment will be randomly assigned to target lesion 1 and lesion 2.
BID regimen
BID regimen
QD regimen
QD regimen

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Total Sign Score (TSS) in Target Lesions at Day 15: Crisaborole Ointment 2% Versus Vehicle
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15
Lesion TSS was an assessment of the target lesion severity, which was based on severity of 4 clinical signs erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification. All of these 4 signs were rated on a scale of 0 to 3 (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe). These ratings were added to create a total TSS score; ranging from 0 (none) to 12 (most severe), with higher score representing greater severity.
Baseline, Day 15

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Total Sign Score in Target Lesions at Day 15: Crisaborole Ointment 2% BID Versus Crisaborole Ointment 2% QD
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15
Lesion TSS was an assessment of the target lesion severity, which was based on severity of 4 clinical signs erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification. All of these 4 signs were rated on a scale of 0 to 3 (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe). These ratings were added to create a total TSS score; ranging from 0 (none) to 12 (most severe), with higher score representing greater severity.
Baseline, Day 15
Change From Baseline in Total Sign Score in Target Lesions at Day 8: Crisaborole Ointment 2% Versus Vehicle
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 8
Lesion TSS was an assessment of the target lesion severity, which was based on severity of 4 clinical signs erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification. All of these 4 signs were rated on a scale of 0 to 3 (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe). These ratings were added to create a total TSS score; ranging from 0 (none) to 12 (most severe), with higher score representing greater severity.
Baseline, Day 8
Change From Baseline in Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score in Target Lesions at Day 8 and Day 15
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 8, Day 15
ISGA assessed the severity of AD on a 5-point scale ranged from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe), where higher scores indicated higher degree of AD. Grades for classification of severity: 0= clear (minor residual hypo/hyper pigmentation, no erythema or induration or papulation, no oozing or crusting), 1= almost clear (trace faint pink erythema, with barely perceptible induration or papulation and no oozing or crusting), 2= mild (faint pink erythema with mild induration or papulation and no oozing or crusting), 3= moderate (pink-red erythema with moderate induration or papulation with or without oozing or crusting) and 4= severe (deep or bright red erythema with severe induration or papulation and with oozing or crusting).
Baseline, Day 8, Day 15
Change From Baseline in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) in Target Lesions up to Day 15 in Participants Aged 12 Years or More
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
The severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD at the target lesion was assessed using the peak pruritus NRS. Participants aged 12 years or more, were asked to rate their itch severity at the worst moment during the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable); higher scores represented more severe itch.
Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
Change From Baseline in Itch Severity Scale in Target Lesions up to Day 15 in Participants Aged Between 6 to 11 Years
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
The itch severity scale was used for participants >=6 to 11 years of age to assess severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD at the target lesion. In this assessment, participants were asked to choose a unit that showed how itchy their skin had been on day of assessment on a 5-point scale ranging from 1= not itchy to 5= very itchy, where higher scores represented more severe itch.
Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
Change From Baseline in Observer Reported Itch Severity Numerical Rating Scale in Target Lesions up to Day 15 in Participants Aged Between 2 to 11 Years
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
Observer reported itch severity NRS was used for participants >=2 and < 12 years of age to assess severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD at the target lesion. Parents/caregivers (of participants) were asked to rate participants' itch (i.e. scratching, rubbing) at the worst moment during past 24 hours on a scale of 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable); higher scores represented more severe itch.
Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) in the Target Lesions Per Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Preferred Term
Time Frame: Day 1 up to 35 days after end of treatment (maximum up to Day 50)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to end of study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. For this outcome measure, treatment-emergent AEs occurred at each treated target lesion were summarized. MedDRA version 22.1 coding dictionary was used.
Day 1 up to 35 days after end of treatment (maximum up to Day 50)
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) by Treatment Regimen
Time Frame: Day 1 up to 35 days after end of treatment (maximum up to Day 50)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; Initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to end of study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state.
Day 1 up to 35 days after end of treatment (maximum up to Day 50)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 16, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 16, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atopic Dermatitis

Clinical Trials on Crisaborole ointment 2%

3
Subscribe