Burst Neurostimulation for Discogenic Low Back Pain

November 15, 2024 updated by: Rijnstate Hospital

Prospective Post Market Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain

The purpose of this prospective post market pilot study is to evaluate the effect of Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation(B-SCS) in the management of chronic discogenic pain in subjects who are refractory to other available treatments. Selected subjects will not be suitable candidates for lumbar spinal surgery and will meet the standard selection process for SCS as routinely utilized in the study centers. Results from this pilot study will inform current clinical practice and future comparative studies in this specific population. Eligible subjects for B-SCS will be asked to participate in this study. If they decide to participate, they will be treated with the Prodigy TM and Proclaim TM (Abbott Laboratories) SCS system and prospectively followed for 12 months following implantation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, single-arm, single-center, post-market, pilot study to collect data on back pain relief, subject satisfaction, quality of life, physical functioning and safety. Chronic discogenic pain(CDP) suffering patients will be followed for 12 months with follow-up visits at 3, 6, and 12 months. In line with standard practice the system will be implanted in two stages. The first stage is the Trial Burst spinal cord Neurostimulation (TBNS) phase during which epidural leads are implanted and temporarily tunnelled to an external trial stimulation device. Subjects will then utilize the temporary system for a period in line with usual practice (typically 10-14 days). If, at the end of this TBNS phase a reduction of ≥50% is achieved the device will be permanently implanted (the second stage) and subjects will be followed-up during 12 months. Patients who do not have at least 50% pain relief during TBNS will receive a Trial Tonic Neurostimulator(TTNS) targeting the dorsal root ganglion(DRG). Similarly, these patients will be followed-up during 12 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gelderland
      • Arnhem, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6883 AZ
        • Rijnstate hospital Pain Management Centre Velp

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • able and willing to comply with the follow-up schedule and protocol
  • Subject is able to provide written informed consent
  • Chronic low back pain of at least 6 months
  • History consistent with discogenic low back pain (e.g. Pain produced on lumbar motion, significant functional limitation in sitting duration and tolerance)
  • Subject has a negative test block of facet joints in the sacroiliac joint.
  • Neurologic exam without marked motor deficit.
  • Definite/Highly Probable/Discogenic Pain as confirmed by provocative discography according to International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP/ISIS) guidelines
  • Low Back Pain intensity should be 6 or higher measured on a Numeric Pain Rating Scale(NPRS) at baseline
  • Meets all the inclusion criteria for the implantation of a neurostimulation system as typically utilized in the study center
  • Subject has been screened by a multi-disciplinary panel including a psychologist and deemed suitable for implantation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female subject of childbearing potential is pregnant/nursing or plans to become pregnant during the course of the study
  • Escalating or changing pain condition within the past month as evidenced by investigator examination
  • Body Mass Index ≥35
  • Subject has had injection therapy or radiofrequency treatment for their low back pain within the past 3 months
  • Subject currently has an active implantable device including Internal Cardioverter Defibrillator(ICD), pacemaker, spinal cord stimulator, or intrathecal drug pump
  • Subject is unable to operate the device
  • Severe disc degeneration at the affected level as evidenced by >50% disc height loss on plain anteroposterior and lateral lumbar radiographs of ComputoTomography (CT)/Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI).
  • Extruded or sequestered herniated nucleus pulposus at the affected level(s).
  • Previous lumbar back surgery (e.g. Laminectomy, discectomy or fusion) at the affected level(s)
  • Moderate to severe spinal stenosis due to osteophyte and/or ligamentous overgrowth as evidenced by MRI or CT in the previous 6 months
  • Moderate to severe endplate degenerative changes at the affected levels Grade 1-2 spondylolisthesis
  • Previous Neurostimulation(SCS) therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Burst Spinal Cord Neurostimulation
Burst spinal cord stimulation. When this fails, tonic stimulation targeting the DRG wil be applied
Spinal cord stimulation with burst modality for discogenic low back pain
Other Names:
  • spinal cord burst stimulation
  • spinal cord stimulation
  • ProdigyTM Abbott Laboratories
  • ProclaimTM Abbott Laboratories

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain severity
Time Frame: 1 year
Pain severity, assessed by an 11 point (0-10) numerical pain rating scale 0=no pain, 10 very severe pain
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 year
Patient's Global Impression of Change, a 7-point Likert scale ( 1 =very much improved and 7 is very much worse
1 year
Disability
Time Frame: 1 year
Physical function will be assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index
1 year
Quality of Life utility score
Time Frame: 1 year
EuroQol-5D-5L
1 year
Safety; Serious and Adverse events
Time Frame: 1 year
Safety will be monitored by the collection and reporting of device related adverse events, device related serious adverse events and any unanticipated serious adverse events (regardless of device relatedness).
1 year
Pain type
Time Frame: 1 year
PainDETECT® questionnaire which is designed to differentiate between neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jan Willem Kallewaard, MD, Rijnstate Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 28, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NL 67172.091.18

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Neurostimulation

Subscribe