Assessment of Remifentanil for Rapid Sequence Induction and Intubation in Full Stomach Patient Compared to Muscle Relaxant (REMICRUSH)

April 26, 2021 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Assessment of Remifentanil for Rapid Sequence Induction and Intubation in Full Stomach Patient Compared to Muscle Relaxant. A Non-inferiority Simple Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

REMICrush is a French multicentric non inferiority simple blind randomized clinical trial that will compare the use of Remifentanil to muscle relaxant (reference treatment) for anesthetic rapid sequence intubation in terms of major complications (difficult intubation, gastric liquid aspiration, desaturation, hemodynamics reaction, ventricular arrhythmia, anaphylactic reaction).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND: Rapid sequence intubation is the reference anaesthetic procedure for patient at risk of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents (for example emergency procedure, bowel obstruction, obese patients, gastroesophageal reflux …) or difficult airway management. Nowadays the use of Succinylcholine (CELOCURINE), a neuromuscular blockade with a short duration of action, is recommended in this indication. However, several adverse events are frequently reported, especially anaphylactic reaction, restraining its use for rapid sequence intubation. Other adverse effects such as extended neuromuscular block, malignant hyperthermia or severe hyperkaliemia prohibit its use. In this case the use of another neuromuscular blockade, Rocuronium (ESMERON), is an alternative solution. Unfortunately, this other molecule causes as many anaphylactic event as Succinylcholine (1 anaphylactic event for 3000 uses) and produce a long duration of neuromuscular block. Incidence of anaphylactic reaction is increasing in France and mostly severe reactions. Its utilization is therefore reduced to 31 to 55% of crush induction despite the recommendations. Remifentanil is an opioid agent with very shorts delay and duration of action. Several study have shown similar intubation conditions in planned surgery with the use of Remifentanil instead of neuromuscular blockade and less hemodynamic reactions. Remifentanil is already approved for anesthetic induction and recognized as an alternative to neuromuscular blockade for the intubation of children. Use of remifentanil has shown satisfying intubation conditions for adults but its incidence of major complications compared to succinylcholine remains unknown.

Study hypothesis: The investigators thus hypothesized that Remifentanil is non inferior to neuromuscular blockade in terms of major complications after a crush induction.

Methods: A multicenter simple blind randomized controlled trial. 11 centers will participate in this project.

Experimental treatment arm: During anesthetic induction remifentanil will be injected immediately after hypnotic drug through bolus intravenous injection by a peripheral or verified central venous access, at 3 to 4 µg/kg. Orotracheal intubation will be performed 30 to 60 seconds later by a graduated anesthesiologist or a resident with 4 validated semesters.

Control arm treatment: A neuromuscular blockade will be injected right after the hypnotic drug. Whether succinylcholine (CELOCURINE) at 1mg/kg or Rocuronium (ESMERON) at 1mg/kg in a bolus intravenous injection by a peripheral or verified central venous access. Orotracheal intubation will be performed after occurring of fasciculations with succinylcholine or 30 to 60 seconds after injection of Rocuronium by a graduated anesthesiologist or a resident with 4 validated semesters.

Objective and judgment criteria: The primary objective is to demonstrate non inferiority of Remifentanil compared to neuromuscular blockade in terms of major complications after a crush induction. Primary endpoint is the rate of tracheal intubation without major complications as defined by 1/ tracheal intubation with less than 2 laryngoscopies 2/ no aspiration during the 10 minutes after induction 3/ no desaturation under 95% during the 10 minutes after induction 4/ no hypo or hypertension as defined by a Median blood pressure<50 mmHg or >110 mmHg 5/ NO ventricular arrhythmia involving an emergency treatment or cardiac arrest during the 10 minutes after induction 6/ No grade III or IV anaphylactic reaction after the 10 minutes after induction.

Statistical analyses:

A 80% incidence of intubation without major complication was hypothesized. Non inferiority has been set under a superior limit of 7% for the primary endpoint 95% of the proportions difference between intervention and control group. In order to achieve 80 power with a 5% alpha risk, 1150 patients (575 for each arms) are to be included.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1150

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Angers, France
        • University Hospital
      • Brest, France
        • Military Hospital
      • Brest, France
        • University Hospital
      • Grenoble, France
        • University Hospital
      • La Roche-sur-Yon, France
        • CHD Vendee
      • Le Mans, France
        • Hospital
      • Lille, France
        • University Hospital
      • Lille, France
        • University hospital (SALENGRO hospital)
      • Lyon, France
        • University Hospital Lyon Sud
      • Nantes, France
        • University Hospital
      • Nantes, France
        • Le Confluent
      • Toulouse, France
        • Toulouse University Hospital
      • Valenciennes, France
        • Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - male or female
  • aged from 18 to 80 years old
  • surgery requiring general anaesthesia with tracheal with oro-tracheal intubation
  • Rapid sequence intubation indication
  • aspiration risk defined as : fasting < 6h00, digestive occlusion, functional ileus, vomiting < 12h00, orthopaedic trauma < 12h00, severe gastric reflux, gastroparesis and/or dysautonomia and or gastro-oesophagus surgery
  • signed informed consent sheet ; or emergency procedure if impossible

Exclusion Criteria:

  • planned impossible intubation
  • suspected/known allergy to neuromuscular blockade or remifentanil
  • Neuromuscular disease forbidding neuromuscular blockade use
  • Prolonged neuromuscular block former episode
  • Malignant hyperthermia former episode
  • Pre-operative respiratory failure (spO2< 95%)
  • Pre-operative hemodynamic failure (use of vasopressor)
  • cardiac arrest
  • A woman of childbearing age who has an active pregnancy and/or clinical signs suggestive of an active pregnancy and/or does not have a contraceptive or contraceptive method and has had unprotected sex within 15 days of the last menstrual period.
  • Patients under justice protection
  • Use of etomidate for anesthetic induction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Remifentanil group
bolus intravenous injection of 3 to 4µg/kg of remifentanil after hypnotic administration for a crush anesthetic induction
bolus intravenous injection of 3 to 4µg/kg of remifentanil after hypnotic administration for a crush anesthetic induction
Active Comparator: Neuromuscular blockade group
Bolus intravenous injection of 1mg/kg of Succinylcholine or Rocuronium after hypnotic administration for a crush anesthetic induction
Bolus intravenous injection of 1mg/kg of Succinylcholine or Rocuronium after hypnotic administration for a crush anesthetic induction

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of tracheal intubation without major complication
Time Frame: Day 7 from randomization

Primary endpoint is the rate of tracheal intubation without major complications as defined by

  1. tracheal intubation with less than 2 laryngoscopies
  2. no aspiration during the 10 minutes after induction
  3. no desaturation under 95% during the 10 minutes after induction
  4. no hypo or hypertension as defined by a MAP<50mmHg or >110mmHg
  5. no ventricular arrhythmia involving an emergency treatment or cardiac arrest during the 10 minutes after induction
  6. no grade III or IV anaphylactic reaction during the 10 minutes after induction
Day 7 from randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
quality of intubation: score IDS3
Time Frame: At Day 7
score IDS3 is a composite score for evaluating the difficulty of intubation under laryngoscopy.
At Day 7
level of intubation difficulty
Time Frame: within 10 minutes

Cormack Lehane score This score describes laryngoscopic views during orotracheal intubation:

  • Cormack 1: The glottis is seen in its entirety
  • Cormack 2: Only the posterior half of the glottis is seen
  • Cormack 3: Only a tiny part of the glottis is seen
  • Cormack 4: The glottis is hidden by the epiglottis and tongue.
within 10 minutes
Intubation difficulty evaluated by Percentage of opening of the gluteal opening
Time Frame: within 10 minutes

Evaluated by POGO (Percentage of opening of the gluteal opening) The opening of the orifice is defined by the distance between the anterior and posterior corners of the glottis.

  • A POGO score of 0% means that the glottic opening is not visible.
  • A POGO score of 100% means that the entire glottic gap is visible
within 10 minutes
use of alternative technic
Time Frame: within 10 minutes
frequency of alternative technic use
within 10 minutes
induction-intubation delay
Time Frame: Within 7 days
delay between hypnotic injection and apparition of the sixth capnographic curve
Within 7 days
desaturation
Time Frame: within 10 minutes
frequency of saturation between 80 et 95% and under 80% following anesthetic induction
within 10 minutes
severe hemodynamic reaction
Time Frame: within 10 minutes
proportion of patients with cardiac frequency under 45 or above 110 and / or systolic arterial pressure under 80 mmHg or above 160 mmHg and or mean arterial pressure under 55mmHg or above 100 mmHg during the ten minutes following induction
within 10 minutes
teeth/ tracheal trauma
Time Frame: At day 7
proportion of patient with teeth or tracheal (endoscopic exam) trauma
At day 7
Allergies
Time Frame: within 10 minutes
proportion of patients with grade I or II anaphylactic reaction
within 10 minutes
postoperative sore throat
Time Frame: 1 hour after extubation

POST grade (postoperative sore throat) is evaluated at 1 h after extubation

Grade 0 = No pain Grade 1 = Mild pain (complains of pain on request) Grade 2 = Moderate pain (complains of pain spontaneously) Grade 3 = Severe pain (voice change, hoarseness, aphonia)

1 hour after extubation
post operative pneumonia
Time Frame: At day 7
proportion of patients who developed pneumonia at day 7 of hospitalization, as defined by new lung infiltration at chest X-ray or tomodensitometry scanner associated with at least one of the following symptom : new purulent expectoration, change of chronic expectorations, fever> 38°C, leukocyte count < 4000/mL or > 12000/mL, positive blood culture and pathogen identification on respiratory sample
At day 7
Proportion of patients with post-operative respiratory distress
Time Frame: At day 7
proportion of patients who developed post-operative respiratory distress within 7 days of hospitalization defined by acute respiratory failure with hypoxemia, PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 300 mmHg, new bilateral infiltrations on chest X-ray without cardiac etiology
At day 7
In hospital mortality
Time Frame: At day 7
proportion of patients who died in hospital
At day 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 9, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 22, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 22, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intra-tracheal Intubation

Clinical Trials on Remifentanil group

Subscribe