NOTAL-OCT V.2.5 vs Commercial OCT in AMD Patients

November 10, 2020 updated by: Notal Vision Ltd.

Comparison Between Retinal Images Captured by NOTAL-OCT V2.5 and Zeiss Cirrus / Heidelberg Spectralis SD OCT - Study Protocol

Primary objective:

To evaluate the level of agreement between the NOTAL-OCT V2.5 and a commercial OCT in the presence of fluid as identified in the OCT images, in the central 10 degrees of the macula in AMD (Age-related Macular Degeneration) patients.

Secondary objectives:

  1. To evaluate the level of agreement between the NOTAL-OCT V2.5 and a commercial OCT in the presence of fluid as identified in the OCT images, in the central 10 degrees of the macula in DME (Diabetic Macular Edema) patients.
  2. To evaluate patient experience when self-operating the Notal-OCT V2.5.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity regarding the presence and absence of fluid on OCT images of AMD patients. OCT images from the central 10 degrees of the macula in AMD patients will be obtained using the NOTAL OCT v.2.5 and a commercial OCT device (Zeiss Cirrus / Heidlberg SPECTRALIS). These images will be evaluated for the presence/absence of fluid in the images by a human grader. The sensitivity and specificity will be determined by comparison of the presence/absence of fluid in the NOTAL OCT v2.5 images with the presence/absence of fluid in the commercial OCT images.

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity regarding the presence and absence of fluid on OCT images of DME patients. OCT images from the central 10 degrees of the macula in DME patients will be obtained using the NOTAL OCT v.2.5 and a commercial OCT device (Zeiss Cirrus / Heidlberg SPECTRALIS). These images will be evaluated for the presence/absence of fluid in the images by a human grader. The sensitivity and specificity will be determined by comparison of the presence/absence of fluid in the NOTAL OCT v2.5 images with the presence/absence of fluid in the commercial OCT images.

Patients will complete a questionnaire regarding the usability of the NOTAL-OCT v.2.5 device

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

287

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21237
        • Elman Retina Group, PA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

AMD and DME patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ability and willingness to give informed consent (IC)
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Diagnosis of AMD (age-related macular degeneration) and/or DME (diabetic macular edema) in the study eye as confirmed by the investigator and recorded in the patient's clinical record
  • Ability to undergo OCT (optical coherence tomography) testing
  • Visual acuity of 20/400 Snellen (6/120) or better in the study eye

Exclusion Criteria:

- Any ophthalmic or systemic condition that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude the patient from participating in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
NOTAL OCT v.2.5 and Commercial OCT on AMD Patients
OCT Images will be obtained in the central 10 degrees of the macula in AMD patients using the NOTAL OCT v.2.5 device and a Commercial device (Zeiss Cirrus/Heidelberg SPECTRALIS).
OCT SCAN

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of presence/absence of fluid on OCT images from NOTAL-OCT v.2.5 device with a commercial OCT device, in AMD (Age-related Macular Degeneration) patients
Time Frame: less than an hour
To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity regarding the presence and absence of fluid on OCT images of AMD patients. OCT images from the central 10 degrees of the macula in AMD patients will be obtained using the NOTAL OCT v.2.5 and a commercial OCT device (Zeiss Cirrus / Heidlberg SPECTRALIS). These images will be evaluated for the presence/absence of fluid in the images by a human grader. The sensitivity and specificity will be determined by comparison of the presence/absence of fluid in the NOTAL OCT v2.5 images with the presence/absence of fluid in the commercial OCT images.
less than an hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of presence/absence of fluid on OCT images from NOTAL-OCT v.2.5 device with a commercial OCT device, in DR (Diabetic Retinopathy) patients
Time Frame: less then an hour
To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity regarding the presence and absence of fluid on OCT images of DR patients. OCT images from the central 10 degrees of the macula in DR patients will be obtained using the NOTAL OCT v.2.5 and a commercial OCT device (Zeiss Cirrus / Heidlberg SPECTRALIS). These images will be evaluated for the presence/absence of fluid in the images by a human grader. The sensitivity and specificity will be determined by comparison of the presence/absence of fluid in the NOTAL OCT v2.5 images with the presence/absence of fluid in the commercial OCT images.
less then an hour
Patient experience using the NOTAL-OCT v.2.5 device
Time Frame: less than an hour
Patients will complete a questionnaire with 13 statements or questions regarding the usability of the NOTAL-OCT v.2.5 device. For the first 10 statements, patients are asked to specify a level of agreement to the statement. The scale is named "Level of Agreement" and ranges from 1 = strongly agree, to 5 = strongly disagree. A patient's indicating a value of 1 is considered to be a better outcome. The remaining 3 questions are free-form.
less than an hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Elman, Michael Elman, M.D. 9114 Philadelphia Rd #310 Baltimore, Maryland 21237

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 20, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 11, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 4, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 23, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 31, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • C2018.008

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Macular Edema

Clinical Trials on Notal Vision Optical Coherence Tomography Device Version 2.5 (NOTAL-OCT V2.5)

3
Subscribe