Beatboxing and Residual Speech Errors

March 8, 2023 updated by: Heather Leavy Rusiewicz, Duquesne University

The Impact of Beatboxing on the Management of Individuals With Residual Speech Errors

This project will study the effect of practicing speech sounds via beatboxing on speech accuracy, engagement in therapy, and functional outcomes for older children and adolescents with speech sound disorders (SSDs). Though SSDs exhibited by young children are often considered, SSDs are among the most frequent communication disorders in school-aged and adolescent children. SSDs can persist until adulthood. Individuals exhibit residual speech errors (RSE) when speech sounds are produced incorrectly after the age of eight, the age at which speech production is expected to be error-free. Common RSE include /r/, /s/, and /z/, all of which have high frequency in American English.

Beatboxing is a unique manipulation of the speech mechanism in which the individual creates repetitive, percussive and other instrumental sounds by actually being the instrument. Beatboxing is engaging and increasingly found in a variety of musical contexts and mainstream culture. The broad objective of this investigation is to explore the impact of beatboxing as an intervention tool on the speech produced and the functional outcomes attained by children with RSE compared to a traditional articulation therapy approach.The effect of a beatboxing intervention approach (BEAT-Speech) will be compared to traditional articulation therapy and employs a two-group pretest-posttest design. Specifically, the research aims to 1) assess the impact of beatboxing on speech sound production accuracy and amount of targets produced during therapy; 2) examine the relative level of client engagement of individuals exposed to beatboxing intervention; and 3) explore influences of beatboxing experiences on communication, activities, and participation in social and daily interactions.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Heather L Rusiewicz, Ph.D.
  • Phone Number: 412-396-4205
  • Email: rusiewih@duq.edu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 16 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• diagnosed with a speech sound disorder due to residual speech sound errors

Exclusion Criteria:

  • out of age range
  • history of hearing, neurogenic, behavioral diagnoses that can contribute to speech disorder
  • English is not first or preferred language
  • concurrent treatment for speech goals

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Beatboxing: BEAT-Speech
BEAT-Speech integrates beatboxing techniques within speech-therapy services for individuals with speech sound disorders.
Experimental: Traditional Articulation Approach
The traditional approach to treating speech sound disorders focus on one or two sounds at a time until they are mastered by the client. Perceptual and production training are used with target starting at simple (isolation) and moving to more complex (sentences). A variety of cues such as shaping and phonetic placement cues are used.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Speech sound accuracy: dichotomous ratings
Time Frame: within two years
rated by naive, blinded raters
within two years
Speech sound accuracy: visual analog scale ratings
Time Frame: within two years
rated by naive, blinded raters, will mark accuracy on a scale from 0-100 mm (not at all accurate to completely accurate). There is no formal name to this scale at this time given that it is novel to the study.
within two years
Phonetic accuracy
Time Frame: within two years
% of consonants correct determined by phonetic transcription completed by trained transcribers
within two years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
therapeutic engagement level
Time Frame: within two years
measured via clinician ratings and naive, blinded raters who will code nonverbal behaviors associated with engagement/disengagement
within two years
Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating
Time Frame: within two years
five item quantitative questionnaire completed by instructors only after final session
within two years
Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Rating Scale
Time Frame: within two years
single item questionnaire completed by instructors after each treatment session
within two years
PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Pediatric Peer Relationship Scale
Time Frame: within two years
questionnaire completed by participants to assess impact of treatment on social activities and participation. Scale is from 0-4 which is from worse to best outcome.
within two years
Adolescent Communication Questionnaire
Time Frame: within two years
assesses self-efficacy/individual's belief in their ability to make change and succeed in therapy. Scale is fro 1 to 5 with the lowest number being associated with the greatest amount of negative impact to the highest number being associated with no impact.
within two years
Qualitative interview regarding functional outcomes
Time Frame: within two years
phenomenological approach to better understanding themes associated with this novel therapy approach and traditional therapy approach
within two years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

May 5, 2024

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 15, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DuquesneR21MusicHealth

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Speech Sound Disorder

Clinical Trials on BEAT-Speech

3
Subscribe