Effects of Endotoxin Absorption and Cytokine Removal Hemofilter on Severe Septic Shock

March 10, 2021 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Effects of Endotoxin Absorption and Cytokine Removal Hemofilter on Patients With Severe Septic Shock

In recent years, many studies have pointed out that bacterial toxin and cytokine storm are the main causes of shock and multiple organ failure in patients with sepsis. Endotoxin is the main vehicle for systemic inflammatory reaction caused by gram-negative bacteria which induce sepsis. Endotoxin binds to Toll- Like receptor 4 (TLR4) trigger a cytokine storm. The amount of endotoxin is associated with shock, insufficient intestinal perfusion, and poor prognosis. Therefore, clinicians try to use various methods to antagonize the action of endotoxin, which can reduce the cytokine storm and inflammatory response to improve the prognosis of sepsis.

Continuous venous venous hemofiltration plays a role in blood purification in septic shock. With different hemofiltration filters, it has different effects. By removing the inflammatory mediators caused by bacterial toxins and cytokines, shock can be improved. The study plans to receive patients with septic shock and use a hemofiltration filter that adsorbs endotoxin and removes cytokines (oXiris, Baxter Healthcare) to perform continuous venous venous hemofiltration in addition to basic septic shock resuscitation. The effect on the concentration of cytokines in the blood, the infusion dose of inotropics, the fluid balances, and the degree of organ damage was evaluated. It is hoped that the results of this pilot study can lead us to subsequent randomized clinical trials to explore whether this filter can improve the prognosis of septic shock patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • National Taiwan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who meet all criteria (A+B+C):
  • A) Identified infection source under adequate treatment
  • B) Sepsis (the sequential organ failure assessment score rise 2 points or more)
  • C) Severe septic shock (serum lactate > 2 mmol/L; need continuous norepinephrine infusion to maintain adequate blood pressure, of which dosage is > 0.2 mcg/kg/min for more than 1 hour or >0.1 mcg/kg/min for more than 3 hours )

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Onset of severe septic shock more than 24 hours
  • Received continuous renal replacement therapy within 24 hours before enrollment
  • Serum white blood cell count count < 1000 cells/μL or Platelet count < 50000 cells/μL
  • History of allergy to heparin
  • Received cardiopulmonary resuscitation within 4 weeks before enrollment
  • ICU admission due to severe septic shock within 2 months
  • Patients or Family had chosen palliative care and signed an agreement to deny aggressive treatment
  • Pregnancy
  • APACHE II Score > 30 at enrollment
  • Non-native speakers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Blood Purification
Patients will receive resuscitation and treatment according to current guidelines for septic shock. In addition to standard care, the patients will receive continuous venovenous hemofiltration and adsorption with oXiris blood purification set.
Continuous venovenous hemofiltration and adsorption (CVVHA) with oXiris filter for up to 72 hours if required. The filter will be replaced every 24 hours. The setting of CVVHA is as follows: blood flow rate 200 mL/min, replacement fluid rate 2000 mL/hr, pre-dilution 50% and post-dilution 50%. If continuous renal replacement therapy is indicated after 72 hours, conventional hemofiltration filters will be used.
No Intervention: Conventional Treatment
Patients will receive standard care, including resuscitation and treatment according to current guidelines for septic shock.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference of serum interleukin-6 level
Time Frame: 24 hours
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference of serum interleukin-6 level
Time Frame: 48 hours
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
48 hours
Difference of serum interleukin-6 level
Time Frame: 72 hours
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
72 hours
Difference of serum interleukin-1β level
Time Frame: 24 hours
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
24 hours
Difference of serum interleukin-1β level
Time Frame: 48 hours
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
48 hours
Difference of serum interleukin-1β level
Time Frame: 72 hours
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
72 hours
Difference of serum interleukin-10 level
Time Frame: 24 hours
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
24 hours
Difference of serum interleukin-10 level
Time Frame: 48 hours
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
48 hours
Difference of serum interleukin-10 level
Time Frame: 72 hours
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
72 hours
Difference of serum procalcitonin level
Time Frame: 24 hours
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
24 hours
Difference of serum procalcitonin level
Time Frame: 48 hours
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
48 hours
Difference of serum procalcitonin level
Time Frame: 72 hours
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
72 hours
Difference of mean arterial pressure
Time Frame: 24 hours
Comparison to enrollment
24 hours
Difference of mean arterial pressure
Time Frame: 48 hours
Comparison to enrollment
48 hours
Difference of mean arterial pressure
Time Frame: 72 hours
Comparison to enrollment
72 hours
Difference of cardiac output
Time Frame: 24 hours
Comparison to enrollment
24 hours
Difference of cardiac output
Time Frame: 48 hours
Comparison to enrollment
48 hours
Difference of cardiac output
Time Frame: 72 hours
Comparison to enrollment
72 hours
Difference of norepinephrine infusion rate
Time Frame: 24 hours
Comparison to enrollment
24 hours
Difference of norepinephrine infusion rate
Time Frame: 48 hours
Comparison to enrollment
48 hours
Difference of norepinephrine infusion rate
Time Frame: 72 hours
Comparison to enrollment
72 hours
Difference of the sequential organ failure assessment score
Time Frame: 24 hours
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
24 hours
Difference of the sequential organ failure assessment score
Time Frame: 48 hours
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
48 hours
Difference of the sequential organ failure assessment score
Time Frame: 72 hours
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
72 hours
Difference of serum endocan level
Time Frame: 24 hours
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
24 hours
Difference of serum endocan level
Time Frame: 48 hours
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
48 hours
Difference of serum endocan level
Time Frame: 72 hours
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
72 hours
Difference of serum diamine oxidase level
Time Frame: 24 hours
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
24 hours
Difference of serum diamine oxidase level
Time Frame: 48 hours
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
48 hours
Difference of serum diamine oxidase level
Time Frame: 72 hours
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
72 hours
Difference of daily IV fluids
Time Frame: 24 hours
Comparison between 2 groups
24 hours
Difference of daily IV fluids
Time Frame: 48 hours
Comparison between 2 groups
48 hours
Difference of daily IV fluids
Time Frame: 72 hours
Comparison between 2 groups
72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 17, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 20, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Septic Shock

Clinical Trials on oXiris blood purification set

Subscribe