The Preventive Value of Acupoint Sensitization Based on Stable Angina Pectoris

March 25, 2021 updated by: Sun Xin, West China Hospital

This study, taking stable angina pectoris as a research carrier, aims to explore the preventive value of acupoint sensitization by conducting a double-blind multi-center randomized controlled trial to compare the effect of stimulating acupoints with different sensitivity on the prevention of angina pectoris.

After the inclusion of eligible patients, the pressure-pain threshold of disease-related acupoints will be detected by using Von Frey detector. Then, the patients will be randomly divided into experimental group and control group. The patients in experimental group will be given acupoints pressure on the five acupoints with the lowest pressure-pain threshold, while the patients in control group will be given acupoints pressure on the five acupoints with the five acupoints with the highest pressure-pain threshold. The two groups will be treated with acupoints pressure 12 times within 4 weeks. The patients will be evaluated three times at baseline, the end of treatment and four weeks after the end of treatment respectively, including angina attack frequency, CCS classification and SAQ score.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

202

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
        • The West China Hospital of Sichuan University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with stable angina pectoris and symptoms of chest pain
  • The duration of onset was more than 3 months, and the number of angina attacks in the past month was not less than 2
  • Not younger than 35 years old and not older than 80 years old
  • Patients will participate in the study voluntarily and have signed the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with mental retardation
  • Patients were contraindicated or unable to complete acupoint sensitization test
  • Patients with cardiovascular, digestive, urinary, respiratory, blood, nervous, endocrine system and other serious primary diseases
  • Patients with bleeding, allergy constitution
  • Patients with abnormal skin or peripheral nerve sensation, abnormal pain sensation, skin ulceration at the sensitization detection site
  • Patients with unsatisfactory clinical treatment of hypertension and diabetes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hypersensitive acupoint group
The first five acupoints in the sensitization sequence were pressed using the traditional Chinese medicine acupoint pressing technique, and each acupoint was pressed for two minutes.
Active Comparator: Hyposensitive acupoint group
The last five acupoints in the sensitization sequence were pressed using the traditional Chinese medicine acupoint pressing technique, and each acupoint was pressed for two minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of the number of angina attacks
Time Frame: Change from baseline to week 8
Change of the number of uncomfortable events that met the criteria for angina in study period
Change from baseline to week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of the Canadian Cardiology Society (CCS) Classification of Angina Pectoris
Time Frame: Change from baseline to week 8
According to the patient's own condition scale, the patients were divided into 4 grades, the mildest being grade I and the most serious being grade IV
Change from baseline to week 8
Change of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire(SAQ) Score
Time Frame: Change from baseline to week 8
The maximum score of the scale was 100, and the higher the score, the better the quality of life and the functional state of the patients
Change from baseline to week 8
Change of the use of Therapeutic Nitroglycerin Drugs
Time Frame: Change from baseline to week 8
Change of the number of times that patients temporarily took nitroglycerin for angina attacks
Change from baseline to week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 22, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on The Clinical Value of Acupoint Sensitization

Clinical Trials on Hypersensitive acupoint group

Subscribe