Evaluation of Objective Pain Measurement Device

June 6, 2025 updated by: Brendan Carvalho, Stanford University
This study will attempt to objectively measure pain with an experimental device. The investigators will apply the device to measure patients "pain" due to uterine contractions during routine clinical care to correlate patients verbal pain ratings and analgesia requirements to that measured by the device. A brain oxygenation device, Edwards Foresight, will be used to concurrently to monitor brain oxygenation and hemodynamics, so the relationship between the CereVu ROPA device objective measure of pain and brain oxygenation/hemodynamic changes and patient-reported pain can be determined.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Despite all the progress in our understanding of the basic mechanisms of pain, the gold standard for measuring pain is still a subjective verbal numeric rating scale rating (0-10) obtained from the individual reporting pain. This method is not objective and cannot be used in all patient populations. This study will attempt to objectively measure pain in laboring mothers with a pain measurement device. The investigators aim to 1) see if the pain measurement device (CereVu ROPA) is capable of reflecting different levels of pain ratings in patients in labor having uterine contractions and then changes in pain after receiving different neuraxial techniques for labor pain and to 2) additionally determine the relationship between the CereVu ROPA device, brain oxygenation/hemodynamic changes and patient-reported pain scores.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

130

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-50
  • ASA 1 or 3 +/-E
  • Patient requesting epidural labor analgesia
  • Good toco tracing (clearly showing contractions at least every 5 minutes)
  • Pain score greater than or equal to 3 out of 10 with contractions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of chronic pain
  • History of chronic opioid use
  • BMI > 45
  • Allergy to sensor adhesive material, local anesthetic or opioids
  • Contraindication to neuraxial block
  • Patient on magnesium infusion
  • Inability to give informed consent or understand English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Device Calibration and Validation
Patients requesting epidural labor analgesia will have pain levels monitored during labor.
When participants request labor analgesia, the sensors of the pain measurement device (ROPA System [CereVu Medical, Inc. San Francisco, CA] and Edwards Foresight device) will be applied to the forehead and connected to the device. Data recording is then started.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average Self-report Pain Score
Time Frame: During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Average patient self-reported pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain)
During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Correlation of Average Device Pain Score to Average Self-report Pain Score
Time Frame: During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Pearson correlation
During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Correlation Between Pain Score and Brain Oxygenation
Time Frame: During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Pearson correlation between patient self-reported pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain) and brain oxygenation (0-100%). This outcome will be assessed in part 2 only.
During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Correlation Between Pain Score and Noninvasive Blood Pressure
Time Frame: During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Pearson correlation between patient self-reported pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain) and hemodynamic parameter noninvasive blood pressure. This outcome will be assessed in part 2 only.
During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Correlation Between Pain Score and Heart Rate
Time Frame: During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Pearson correlation between patient self-reported pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain) and hemodynamic parameter heart rate. This outcome will be assessed in part 2 only.
During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Correlation Between Pain Score and Pulse Oximetry
Time Frame: During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Correlation between patient self-reported pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain) and hemodynamic parameter pulse oximetry (Sp02). This outcome will be assessed in part 2 only.
During labor up to 2 hours after epidural

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Reach Pain Score 2 or Less Out of 10
Time Frame: within 45 minutes after the block placement
Pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain)
within 45 minutes after the block placement
Time Taken for Pain Device Score to be Below Validated Value
Time Frame: within 45 minutes after the block placement
Validated value is from the validated reading recorded by the sensor in the pilot study
within 45 minutes after the block placement
Patient Reported Pain Scores After Block
Time Frame: Up to approximately 45 minutes after the block placement
Pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain). Pain scores were obtained at random intervals and the scores were summed and averaged to create the reported score. Patients stopped rating pain once the level dropped to zero.
Up to approximately 45 minutes after the block placement
Device Recorded Pain Scores After Block
Time Frame: Up to approximately 45 minutes after the block placement
Device pain score validated measure (range: 0 to 10, higher scores correspond to more pain). Pain scores were obtained at random intervals and the scores were summed and averaged to create the reported score. Device recording was discontinued when pain level dropped to zero.
Up to approximately 45 minutes after the block placement
Dermatomal Level at 45 Minutes After Block Placement as a Measure of Sensory Blockade Level
Time Frame: 45 minutes
45 minutes
Count of Participants With Block Failures
Time Frame: within 45 minutes after the block placement
within 45 minutes after the block placement
Count of Participants With Maternal Side Effects
Time Frame: within 45 minutes after the block placement
Monitored maternal side effects will include nausea, pruritis, hypotension
within 45 minutes after the block placement
Count of Participants With Fetal Side Effects
Time Frame: within 45 minutes after the block placement
Monitored fetal side effects include fetal decelerations early/variable/late
within 45 minutes after the block placement
Count of Participants Needing Physician Intervention
Time Frame: within 45 minutes after the block placement
within 45 minutes after the block placement
Time From Epidural to Delivery
Time Frame: from epidural to delivery (average approximately 9 hours)
from epidural to delivery (average approximately 9 hours)
Count of Participants With Normal Vaginal Delivery
Time Frame: from epidural to delivery (expected average: 24 hours)
from epidural to delivery (expected average: 24 hours)
Count of Participants With Assisted Vaginal Delivery
Time Frame: from epidural to delivery (expected average: 24 hours)
from epidural to delivery (expected average: 24 hours)
Count of Participants With Cesarean Delivery
Time Frame: from epidural to delivery (expected average: 24 hours)
from epidural to delivery (expected average: 24 hours)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brendan Carvalho, MBBCh, FRCA, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 51101

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Pain Measurement Device

Subscribe