- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04717518
Anchoring Patients Pain Scores in the Emergency Department
March 29, 2022 updated by: Landry Dorsett, DO, CHRISTUS Health
The proposed research will be a prospective, observational study to test the hypothesis that anchoring will affect verbal pain scores in the emergency department.
There will be a small retrospective aspect to this study to obtain patient satisfaction ratings.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The investigators will evaluate a convenience sample of patients presenting to the ED with a complaint of pain.
Patients will be consented for participation and will fill out a brief survey concerning the current visit in the ED.
There will be two forms of the survey.
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two survey forms.
Participants will first be asked if their pain score for this visit is greater than or less than an anchor number provided.
In this survey, the investigators will use 20 and 80 as our anchoring numbers.
The participants will then have a follow up question asking them to estimate their pain score on a 0-100 scale.
Investigators will then perform a chart review to determine patient satisfaction scores for that specific visit to determine if the anchoring effect has any input on patient satisfaction scores.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
108
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Corpus Christi, Texas, United States, 78404
- CHRISTUS Spohn Health System
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Study subjects include patients presenting to the Emergency Department at CHRISTUS Spohn Shoreline with a chief complaint of pain.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age or older
- Presenting to the ED with a chief complaint of any type of pain
Exclusion Criteria:
- Under 18 years of age
- Refusal to consent
- Incarcerated patients
- Pregnant patients
- Unable to complete survey secondary to clinical instability, severe pain, or disorientation determined by a study physician
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Lower Anchor Survey
Patients will likely rate their pain lower.
|
Patients will fill out a brief survey concerning the current visit to the ED.
|
|
Higher Anchor Survey
Patients will likely rate their pain higher.
|
Patients will fill out a brief survey concerning the current visit to the ED.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Utilization of a questionnaire to measure the mean pain scores between two intervention groups based on the numeric pain score scale
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
A questionnaire will be used to measure pain scores by utilizing a numeric pain scale (0-100) and measure the effect of anchoring bias on pain scores in the Emergency Department.
It is hypothesized that a lower pain score anchor will lead to a lower reported pain score by the patient.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
An analysis to examine the influence of anchoring on patient satisfaction for patients with common chief complaints related to pain in the Emergency Department. It is unknown if anchoring affects a patient's overall satisfaction.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Patients receive Press-Ganey questionnaire to evaluate their visit to the Emergency Department.
We will measure if the anchoring pain score affects the patients overall satisfaction with their Emergency Department care.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Landry Dorsett, DO, CHRISTUS Spohn Health System
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
- Scholl L, Seth P, Kariisa M, Wilson N, Baldwin G. Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Deaths - United States, 2013-2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Jan 4;67(5152):1419-1427. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm675152e1.
- Compton WM, Jones CM, Baldwin GT. Relationship between Nonmedical Prescription-Opioid Use and Heroin Use. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 14;374(2):154-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1508490. No abstract available.
- "CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain." CDC, 2019, www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/prescribing/guideline.html.
- Colorado Opioid Safety Pilot Results Report The Colorado Opioid Safety Collaborative Background. Colorado Hospital Association, 2017.
- "Nonopioid Pain Management | AHA." American Hospital Association, 2018, www.aha.org/bibliographylink-page/2018-09-28-nonopioid-pain-management. Accessed 13 Nov. 2019.
- "Overdose Death Maps." CDC, 13 Aug. 2019, www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/data/prescribing/overdosedeath-maps.html.
- Meisel ZF, Lupulescu-Mann N, Charlesworth CJ, Kim H, Sun BC. Conversion to Persistent or High-Risk Opioid Use After a New Prescription From the Emergency Department: Evidence From Washington Medicaid Beneficiaries. Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Nov;74(5):611-621. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
- Marco CA, Kanitz W, Jolly M. Pain scores among emergency department (ED) patients: comparison by ED diagnosis. J Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;44(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
- Marco CA, Nagel J, Klink E, Baehren D. Factors associated with self-reported pain scores among ED patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Feb;30(2):331-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.12.015. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
- Northcraft, Gregory B, and Margaret A Neale. "Experts, Amateurs, and Real Estate: An Anchoring-andAdjustment Perspective on Property Pricing Decisions." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 39, no. 1, 1987, pp. 84-97, 10.1016/0749-5978(87)90046-x.
- . Wansink, Brian, et al. "An Anchoring and Adjustment Model of Purchase Quantity Decisions." Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 35, no. 1, Feb. 1998, pp. 71-81, 10.1177/002224379803500108.
- Yadav, Manjit S. "How Buyers Evaluate Product Bundles: A Model of Anchoring and Adjustment." Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 21, no. 2, Sept. 1994, p. 342, 10.1086/209402.
- Liang, Hanchao, et al. "Bounded Rationality, Anchoring-and-Adjustment Sentiment, and Asset Pricing." The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, vol. 40, Apr. 2017, pp. 85-102, 10.1016/j.najef.2017.02.001. Accessed 13 Nov. 2019.
- Brewer NT, Chapman GB, Schwartz JA, Bergus GR. The influence of irrelevant anchors on the judgments and choices of doctors and patients. Med Decis Making. 2007 Mar-Apr;27(2):203-11. doi: 10.1177/0272989X06298595.
- Amir R, Leiba R, Eisenberg E. Anchoring the Numeric Pain Scale Changes Pain Intensity Reports in Patients With Chronic But Not With Acute Pain. Pain Pract. 2019 Mar;19(3):283-288. doi: 10.1111/papr.12738. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
- Riva P, Rusconi P, Montali L, Cherubini P. The influence of anchoring on pain judgment. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Aug;42(2):265-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.10.264. Epub 2011 Mar 12.
- Marco CA, Marco AP, Plewa MC, Buderer N, Bowles J, Lee J. The verbal numeric pain scale: effects of patient education on self-reports of pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Aug;13(8):853-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.04.020.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 24, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 12, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
November 12, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 16, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
January 22, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 7, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 29, 2022
Last Verified
March 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Nervous System Diseases
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Disease Attributes
- Signs and Symptoms, Digestive
- Joint Diseases
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Muscular Diseases
- Neuromuscular Diseases
- Musculoskeletal Pain
- Emergencies
- Arthralgia
- Myalgia
- Chest Pain
- Abdominal Pain
- Neck Pain
- Headache
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2020-132
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Plans to collaborate with other universities in other studies and/or grants.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Joint Pain
-
SI-BONE, Inc.Active, not recruitingSacroiliac Joint Pain | Sacroiliac Joint DysfunctionUnited States
-
Shanghai Changzheng HospitalCompletedFacet Joints; Degeneration ; Deep Learning ;Artificial Intelligence | Facet Joint Pain; Low Back Pain | Facet Joint DiseaseChina
-
Christoph Maier, Prof. Dr.CompletedLow Back Pain | Facet Joint PainGermany
-
Europainclinics z.ú.TerminatedLow Back Pain | Facet Joint PainSlovakia
-
Hamilton Health Sciences CorporationMcMaster UniversityWithdrawn
-
Tri-Service General HospitalNot yet recruitingSacroiliac Joint Pain | Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
-
Assiut UniversityCompletedLumbar Facet Joint PainEgypt
-
University of PittsburghRecruitingAnalgesia | Pain, Procedural | Pain, Chronic | Facet Joint PainUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityWithdrawnLumbar Facet Joint PainUnited States
-
Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education...CompletedSacroiliac Joint Somatic Dysfunction | Sacroiliac Joint PainTurkey (Türkiye)
Clinical Trials on Measurement of Pain
-
St. Antonius HospitalCompletedCritically Ill Patients
-
NHS FifeCompletedArthroscopic Shoulder Surgery | Pain ThresholdUnited Kingdom
-
Istanbul Medeniyet UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Stanford UniversityAutonomous Healthcare, Inc.CompletedPain, AcuteUnited States
-
Puerta de Hierro University HospitalHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon; Hospital Universitario Ramon... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
University Hospital, CaenTerminatedQuality of Life | Cancer | Nurse's RoleFrance
-
Konya Beyhekim Training and Research HospitalNot yet recruitingTemporomandibular DysfunctionTurkey
-
Stanford UniversityCompleted
-
Taif UniversityUnknown
-
Ataturk Training and Research HospitalCompleted