Geriatric Core Dataset (G-CODE) for Clinical Research in Elderly Cancer Patients (G-CODE)

December 30, 2020 updated by: Institut Bergonié

Multidisciplinary Development of the Geriatric Core Dataset for Clinical Research in Older Patients With Cancer: A French Initiative With International Survey

Older adults with cancer remain underrepresented in cancer clinical trials that establish new standards of care. Geriatric assessment (GA) is defined by geriatricians as a multidimensional interdisciplinary assessment of the general health stat us of the older patient, reviewing the medical, psychosocial, functional and environmental domains. For each domain, several tools are available, but consensus is lacking on which tool to use and the optimal cut-offs or threshold scores. The literature supports the prognostic value of the GA and its utility in weighing the benefits and risks of cancer treatments in older adults. However, GA has not been implemented in routine oncology practice or in cancer clinical trials.

The objective of this project is to develop a set of geriatric data, the Geriatric Core Dataset (G-CODE), to be collected in cancer trials of older patients. The methods rely on a consensus process involving international experts in the field of oncology and geriatrics.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Although cancer is prevalent in the older segment of the population, older adults with cancer remain underrepresented in cancer clinical trials that establish new standards of care. As a result, robust data on the benefit/risk balance are lacking for many treatment strategies in these patients.

Ageing is a heterogeneous process that stresses the clinical need to identify comorbid conditions and ageing-related physiologic changes, both well-known factors increasing the risk of treatment side-effects and poor outcomes.

Geriatric assessment (GA) is defined by geriatricians as a multidimensional interdisciplinary assessment of the general health stat us of the older patient, reviewing the medical, psychosocial, functional and environmental domains. For each domain, several tools are available, but consensus is lacking on which tool to use and the optimal cut-offs or threshold scores. The literature supports the prognostic value of the GA and its utility in weighing the benefits and risks of cancer treatments in older adults. However, GA has not been implemented in routine oncology practice or in cancer clinical trials.

In 2011, after a workshop on clinical trial methodology in older adults with cancer, the Elderly Task Force of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) recommended the use of a standardised minimum data set (minDS) for assessing the global health and functional status of older populations. This minDS consisted of the G8 screening tool, the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Following a consensus approach, a panel of 14 geriatricians from oncology clinics identified seven domains of importance in geriatric assessment. Based on the international recommendations, geriatricians selected the mostly commonly used tools/items for geriatric assessment by domain. The Geriatric Core Dataset (G-CODE) was progressively developed according to RAND appropriateness ratings and feedback during three successive Delphi rounds. The face validity of the G-CODE was assessed with two large panels of health professionals (55 national and 42 international experts) involved both in clinical practice and cancer trials.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bordeaux, France
        • Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The panel of experts (cancer specialists, clinical research associates, nurses) was in charge of assessing the the relevance and approppriateness of the selected tools to include in the Geriatric Core Data Set (G-Code).

Description

  • cancer specialists (medical oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, geriatricians, disease-oriented oncologists, clinical oncologists)
  • clinical research associates
  • nurses.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Elderly cancer patients included in randomized controlled trials

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of Experts Who Considered That the Question "Do You Live Alone ?" Should be Retained in the G-CODE
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Number of Experts Who Considered That the Question "do You Have a Person or Caregiver Able to Provide Care and Support" Should be Retained in the G-CODE
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Number of Experts Who Considered That the Tool "ADL (Activities of Daily Living)" Should be Retained in the G-CODE
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Number of Experts Who Considered That the Tool "4-IADL (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living)" Should be Retained in the G-CODE
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Number of Experts Who Considered That the Test "Timed Up and Go" Should be Retained in the G-CODE
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Number of Experts Who Considered That the Items "Weight Loss During the Past 6 Months and Body Mass Index (BMI)" Should be Retained in the G-CODE
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Number of Experts Who Considered That the Item "One Cognitive Scale (Mini-Cog)" Should be Retained in the G-CODE
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Number of Experts Who Considered That the Item "Char Lson Comorbidity Index" Should be Retained in the G-CODE
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IB2017-GCODE

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Subscribe