Maternal Antibody in Milk After Vaccination (MAMA)

June 10, 2019 updated by: St George's, University of London
Single-centre observational pilot study exploring pertussis specific antibody concentration in the breastmilk of women vaccinated against pertussis in pregnancy at different gestational ages. This study is made up of two stages: first stage to confirm recruitment methods and optimise the laboratory assay and a second stage to complete recruitment for the pilot study.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Pertussis disease is a highly infectious respiratory illness caused by Bordetella pertussis, which can cause significant morbidity and mortality. There has been an increase in cases in many high income countries with high vaccination coverage and in an attempt to control this, antenatal vaccination programmes have been introduced in several countries, including the UK. Vaccination in pregnancy is a strategy which seeks to boost the maternal antibody levels, increase the placental transfer of antibody and consequently increase the antibody levels in the infant.

Human breast milk is a dynamic source of nutrition for the infant and is made up of many immunologically active components including antibody. The principal antibody in breastmilk is IgA and it has been shown that the amount of disease specific antibody in breastmilk can be increased by vaccination in pregnancy for a number of pathogens including pertussis. Secretory IgA (sIgA) plays an important role in immune exclusion in which it blocks adhesion of a pathogen onto a mucosal surface. As the first step of pertussis pathogenesis is the adhesion of bacteria to the ciliated respiratory epithelium in the nasopharynx and trachea there is a clear biological rationale for the hypothesis that receiving breast milk containing more IgA could enhance neonatal immunity and consequently the protective effects of vaccination in pregnancy.

The best time in pregnancy for administering the pertussis vaccination is debated in the literature, with some advocating vaccination in the second trimester and others supporting later vaccination to coincide the time of serum antibody peak with optimum placental transfer. This issue has been considered exclusively from the perspective of serum immunoglobulin G (IgG), but the impact of timing of vaccination in pregnancy on IgA levels in milk may also be important. Previous studies have shown that there is a peak in the pertussis specific IgA in breast milk at day 10 following vaccination, which then declines, and consequently there may be a significant difference in the amount of IgA available in the breastmilk for an infant born to a mother vaccinated at 20 weeks for example, compared to a mother vaccinated at 32 weeks. This may therefore have an impact on future guidelines on optimal time of vaccination in pregnancy.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • London
      • Tooting, London, United Kingdom, SW17 0QT
        • Recruiting
        • St Georges University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women who received a pertussis vaccination between 16 and 32 weeks and are pregnant or within 48 hours of delivery.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Received pertussis vaccination between 16 and 32 gestational weeks
  • Planning to breastfeed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Received vaccination outside of the 16-32 week window
  • Not planning to breastfeed
  • Diagnosis of an immunodeficiency syndrome
  • Multiple pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Women vaccinated at less than 24 weeks
Women receiving a pertussis containing vaccine at less than 24 weeks
Receipt of Boostrix IPV at three different gestational time periods
Women vaccinated at 24-27+6 weeks
Women receiving a pertussis containing vaccine at 24-27+6 weeks
Receipt of Boostrix IPV at three different gestational time periods
Women vaccinated at 28-31+6 weeks
Women receiving a pertussis containing vaccine at 28-31+6 weeks
Receipt of Boostrix IPV at three different gestational time periods

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anti PT IgA at less than 48 hours in colostrum
Time Frame: Within 48 hours of delivery
Anti-pertussis toxin (PT) Immunoglobulin A (IgA) concentration in colostrum
Within 48 hours of delivery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total IgA and IgG in colostrum and breastmilk
Time Frame: Within 48 hours and at 14 and 42 days after delivery
Total IgA and IgG concentration in colostrum and breastmilk
Within 48 hours and at 14 and 42 days after delivery
Anti-PT IgA concentration in breastmilk
Time Frame: At 14 and 42 days following delivery
Anti-PT IgA concentration in breastmilk
At 14 and 42 days following delivery
Anti-PT IgG concentration in colostrum and breastmilk
Time Frame: Within 48 hours and at 14 and 42 days after delivery
Anti-PT IgG concentration in colostrum and breastmilk
Within 48 hours and at 14 and 42 days after delivery
Anti PT IgG concentration in maternal serum
Time Frame: Within 48 hours of delivery
Anti PT IgG concentration in maternal serum
Within 48 hours of delivery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Kirsty Le Doare, St George's, Univeristy of London

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 7, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 31, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 11, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2019

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pertussis

Clinical Trials on Boostrix-IPV

Subscribe