Enhanced Consent and Preparedness for Surgery Trial (ECAPS)

March 8, 2024 updated by: Marian G. Acevedo Alvarez, Loyola University

Enhanced Consent and Preparedness for Surgery (ECAPS) Trial

To develop an audiovisual decision aid (AVDA) to improve the informed consent process. The investigators aim to examine the impact of a comprehensible AVDA that is written below the 8th grade reading level. The AVDA would be used for surgical consent compared to traditional verbal consent. Additionally, the investigators plan to determine whether this effect varies across the measured levels of health literacy of our patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To address the limitations of consent, interventions have been developed to improve the quality of information provided to patients including written pamphlets, videos, and websites. Such interventions have been called decision aids. Decision aids may promote informed consent through greater knowledge and consistency of personal values or attitudes with an enacted choice. Providing adequate information increases satisfaction, more rapid symptom resolution, reduced emotional distress, reduced use of analgesia, and possibly shorter hospital admissions. Cochrane reviews have established that audiovisual decision aids enhance informed surgical consent, yet little data exists about the benefits of such aids in Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS)4.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

158

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Mary Tulke, RN
  • Phone Number: 708-216-2016
  • Email: mtulke@luc.edu

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Maywood, Illinois, United States, 60153
        • Loyola Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients electing for surgical intervention of pelvic organ prolapse, stress urinary incontinence, urgency urinary incontinence by treating physicians in the Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients ≤ 18 years old
  • Non-English speaking patients
  • Patients with video or audio impairments who are unable to view the AVDA

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Group
Will view audiovisual decision aid (AVDA) and then have opportunity for questions with physician before signing consent forms
Will view AVDA and then have opportunity for questions with physician before signing consent forms
No Intervention: Control Group
Will undergo standard verbal informed consent with physician before signing consent forms

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Preparedness for surgery
Time Frame: Day 0
To compare the odds of higher agreement between patients assigned to receive enhanced audiovisual aided consent versus standard consent on the question "Overall, I feel prepared for my upcoming surgery". This item is asked on day of consent and patients respond using a six-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree).
Day 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marian G Acevedo-Alvarez, MD, Loyola Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 22, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Clinical Trials on audiovisual decision aid

3
Subscribe