Home Exercise Program for Homebound Older Adults (HEX)

October 3, 2023 updated by: Alyssa Stookey, University of Maryland, Baltimore

Exercise can be beneficial for older adults by promoting health, delaying or reversing functional decline, reducing chronic disease risk, decreasing falls, increasing strength and stamina, improving ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL), and improving overall quality of life (QOL). Developing and implementing exercise programs for homebound older adults for whom traveling to routine clinic-based appointments may not be feasible or safe becomes critical. Homebound, older adults are at increased risk for recurrent hospitalization, use of emergency care, nursing home placement, and death. Indeed, one study shows patients had significantly higher risk of being admitted into a hospital or nursing home, higher mortality, and higher health care expenditures compared to those in a comparison group. The purpose of this pilot is to develop and implement a pragmatic and feasible intervention to improve physical functioning in older homebound adults with chronic mobility disability. Unfortunately, little is known about the feasibility and utility of pragmatic home-based exercise rehabilitation in older adults with severe mobility limitations.

The investigators propose to develop and implement an intervention targeting functional limitations in this population with mobility disability. Our overall goals are to maintain and restore physical functioning and QOL for older, homebound adults. This research carries direct benefits for these patients as even modest improvements in disabled older adults may translate into significantly better QOL, reduce disability, minimize or reverse gradual declines related to serious chronic disease, resort functional independence, and increase community living capacity. Thus, the specified objectives of finalizing and implementing a sustainable home-based exercise program have practical implications for disabled older adults. Were homebound patients even slightly higher in terms of functional capacity, it could provide a partial degree of functional independence, impacting QOL for both patients and caregivers.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to develop and implement a pragmatic and feasible intervention to improve physical functioning in older homebound adults with chronic mobility disability. Unfortunately, little is known about the feasibility and utility of pragmatic home-based exercise rehabilitation in older adults with severe mobility limitations.

The Specific Aims and Hypotheses of this proposal are:

Specific Aim #1: Using human-centered design methodologies, work with providers and patients to develop a feasible multi-component home exercise program targeting mobility, strength, and performance of task-oriented ADLs. Feasibility will be determined by assessing adherence and retention to the developed exercise program.

Hypothesis 1: The investigators hypothesize that a task-based exercise intervention can be feasibly delivered in the homes of homebound, older adults.

Specific Aim #2: Perform a feasibility study to better assess feasibility and determine the effect(s) of the home-based intervention created in Aim 1 on functional outcomes (primary outcome SPPB), mobility, and QOL changes in homebound older adults with mobility disability.

Hypothesis 2: The investigators hypothesize that the developed 12-week multi-component exercise intervention will improve performance of basic ADLs, functional mobility, and QOL; as well as outcomes related to patient satisfaction, emergency department visits, and hospitalization.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • Recruiting
        • University of Maryland

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Veteran enrolled in the Veterans Administration Medical Health Care System's Home- Based Primary Care Program
  • Aged 65 years or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Paraplegia
  • Life expectancy of less than 12 months
  • Currently engaged in a physical therapy program
  • Any medical condition(s) or contraindications precluding patient participation in the study as per medical judgement of study team

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Home Exercise Program (HEX)
Customized home exercise program
HEX is a customized exercise program with components including: 1) controlled flexibility movements; 2) progressive ADL training focusing on bed mobility, bed to chair transfers, and indoor walking; 3) task-specific seated resistance training to improve ability to get out of bed and; 4) and balance exercises. Participants will be expected to perform their HEX program at least 2 times/week in their home and all individualized exercise sessions will be supervised by an Exercise Physiologist. Each exercise has four levels of difficulty, which will be progressed as tolerated throughout the 12-weeks. Seated resistance exercises were designed to target all the major muscle groups and will include the following: arm curls, shoulder raises (lateral/front), overhead arm raise, wrist curls, leg extensions, hip flexion, hip ab/adduction, sit-to-stands, torso rotation, and marching.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Short Physical Performance Battery
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
captures domains of strength, endurance, and balance and is highly predictive of disability. The SPPB score is based on timed measures of standing balance, walking speed, and ability to rise from a chair.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in 30-second sit-to-stand test
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12-weeks
determines lower extremity strength and endurance in older adults. The number of sit-to-stands is recorded.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12-weeks
Change in 30-second arm curl test
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12-weeks
determines upper extremity strength and endurance in older adults. The number of arm curls is recorded.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12-weeks
Change in Grip Strength
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
This is a surrogate marker for sarcopenia and will be measured with a hand dynamometer. The arm to be tested held by the participant's side and elbow at a 90° angle. The participant squeezes the hand as hard as possible for few seconds. The best out of two trials separated by 60 seconds will be used.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in Lower Extremity Strength
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
will be measured with a wireless digital handheld manual muscle dynamometer during leg extension. To evaluate the knee extensor muscles, the dynamometer will be placed on the anterior part of the lower leg. Participants will perform 3 isometric maximal voluntary contractions of 5 seconds with a 60-second recovery period between contractions.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Mobility
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
The Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) Basic Mobility and Daily Activity Out-patient Low Functioning Short Form to assess basic mobility, daily activity, and applied cognitive.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Assesses functional dependence and independence.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in Life Space Activity (LAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
A multidimensional construct that reflects the geographical area that a person moves over a period of time.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Will be used to assess the subject's self-reported measures of function and disability.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Assessed with an analog visual scale
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alyssa Stookey, PhD, University of Maryland School of Medicine and Baltimore VA Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 4, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UMaryland

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No individual participant data will be shared with other researchers outside of our study team.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aging

Clinical Trials on HEX

3
Subscribe