NobelZygoma TiUltra Implant System Study

November 21, 2025 updated by: Nobel Biocare

A 1-year Prospective Multicenter Clinical Investigation to Assess Safety, Performance and Clinical Benefits of the NobelZygoma TiUltra Implant System in the Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Maxillae

The goal of this prospective study is to assess short term (12-months) clinical outcomes of NobelZygoma TiUltra implants and Multi-unit Abutment Xeal in the rehabilitation of participants with severely atrophic maxilla treated with zygomatic dental implant procedure. The main goal is to assess the sinusitis occurrence at 12-months after implant insertion. Other objectives are to assess: soft tissue health; biological and technical complication; patient's experience, outcomes (sinonasal symptoms and oral health-related quality of life) and satisfaction; clinician's experience with handling of device and satisfaction; implant, abutment and prosthetic survival and adverse events.

Participants will be asked to complete questionnaires at pretreatment visit, postoperative visit, and after 6-months and 12-months of implant insertion. At 12-months a radiological exam (CBCT) will be asked for the participant for the evaluation of the radiological condition of the maxillary sinus.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, interventional, multicenter study that is planned to include 9 sites and 85 participants with severely atrophic maxilla (characterized by class V-VI according to the Cawood and Howell's classification). Participants will be consecutively enrolled upon providing informed consent and meeting all of the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria (details in eligibility section). Zygomatic implant procedure will be performed as per clinician standard of care and participant's anatomy. Both hybrid and quad zygoma techniques, as well as any implant trajectory can be used in the study (e.g. intra-sinus; extra-sinus; sinus slot). Enrolled participants will be treated with NobelZygoma TiUltra implants and respective abutments in accordance with the IFU. All zygomatic implants will be immediately loaded.

The study is designed to describe and quantify the occurrence of maxillary sinusitis in participants treated with NobelZygoma TiUltra implants and Multi-unit Abutments Xeal Zygoma.

The working assumption is that the incidence of sinusitis can be reliably measured at 12 months using standardized clinical (SNOT-22) and radiological (Lund-Mackay) criteria in participants rehabilitated with this treatment approach The primary endpoint of this clinical investigation is the specificity of diagnosis of maxillary sinusitis at 12-months post-implant placement using a combination of clinical and radiological evaluation, using SNOT-22 questionnaire and LM (Lund-Mackay) scoring system for the clinical and CBCT analysis respectively. Other endpoint and parameters will be described in Outcome measures section.

All included participants will be followed for 12-months post-implant placement to assess the safety, performance, and clinical benefits of TiUltra-surfaced zygomatic implants and Mulit-unit Abutment Xeal Zygoma. Possible dropouts and withdrawals, as well as possible adverse events, will be monitored during the entire investigation period.

Each participant will be assigned a participant ID to maintain the confidentiality of the collected data, which will be recorded in the dedicated eCRF. The eCRF system meets EU GDPR requirements for safe data handling. The data will be processed by the eCRF provider for storage purposes and further processed and analyzed by the sponsor.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

85

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Verona, Italy, 37134
        • Universitiy of Verona, Unit of Stomatology and Maxillo-Facial Surgery
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Antonio D Agostino, Prof
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lorenzo Trevisiol, Prof
      • Aarau, Switzerland, 5000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant has signed the informed consent form (ICF).
  • Participant aged ≥ 18 years at the time of treatment.
  • Medical and anatomical conditions are in accordance with the applicable IFU.
  • Participant with a severely atrophic maxilla classified as Cawood and Howell class V or VI
  • Suitable for immediate loading.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of acute or chronic maxillary sinusitis.
  • Zygomatic bone pathologies including tumors, infections, or congenital abnormalities
  • History of recurrent sinusitis (≥ 4 occurrences/year)
  • Pre-operative LM score of ≥ 1
  • Uncontrolled systemic disorders including poorly controlled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes, cardiovascular disease.
  • Active malignancy or currently undergoing oncological treatment.
  • History of severe maxillary jaw injury or maxillofacial trauma.
  • Moderate and heavy smokers (defined as > 5 cigarettes a day).
  • Severe bruxism or dysfunctional tendencies
  • Previous oro-maxillofacial radiotherapy.
  • Use of bisphosphonates.
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Implant loaded > 1 week of zygomatic implant placement

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: NobelZygoma TiUltra implant system in the rehabilitation of severely atrophic maxillae
Participant will receive zygomatic implant treatment for the rehabilitation of severely atrophic maxilla. The treatment will be performed as per standard-of-care and participant's anatomic conditions. The NobelZygoma TiUltra implant and Multi-unit Abutment Xeal Zygoma will be used in all study participants.
All participants will receive NobelZygoma TiUltra implant and Multi-unit Abutment Xeal as part of the implant/prosthetic zygomatic rehabilitation procedure. Implants and abutments will be selected as per surgeon preference and participant's need. Radiological exam will be performed at pre-treatment and 12-months follow-up. Patients will be followed-up after placement of implant at 10-days, 6-months and 12-months follow-up. At 12-months a standardized clinical and radiological criteria (using the SNOT-22 and Lund-Mackay respectively) will be used to describe and quantify the occurrence of maxillary sinusitis across all study centers for the sinusitis diagnose.
All participants will receive NobelZygoma TiUltra implant and Multi-unit Abutment Xeal as part of the implant/prosthetic zygomatic rehabilitation procedure. Implants and abutments will be selected as per surgeon preference and participant's need. Radiological exam will be performed at pre-treatment and 12-months follow-up. Patients will be followed-up after placement of implant at 10-days, 6-months and 12-months follow-up. At 12-months a standardized clinical and radiological criteria (using the SNOT-22 and Lund-Mackay respectively) will be used to describe and quantify the occurrence of maxillary sinusitis across all study centers for the sinusitis diagnose

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maxillary sinusitis at 12-months post-implant placement
Time Frame: At 12-months follow-up of zygomatic implant insertion

The diagnosis of maxillary sinusitis is based on the following criteria:

A positive clinical diagnosis is made when all of the following criteria from SNOT-22 are met simultaneously:

  1. The participant reports at least two clinical symptoms, one of which must be either: nasal blockage/obstruction/congestion, or nasal discharge (anterior or posterior nasal drip). Additional symptoms may include: facial pain or pressure, reduction or loss of smell.
  2. There is a clinically significant worsening in symptoms, demonstrated by a ≥12-point increase in the total SNOT-22 score from baseline (pre-treatment).
  3. If the participant exhibits partial symptoms or if the diagnosis remains uncertain, the Principal Investigator (PI) will refer the participant to an ENT specialist for further evaluation.
At 12-months follow-up of zygomatic implant insertion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PREMs
Time Frame: At pre-treatment; and after 10 days, 6- and 12-months of zygomatic implant placement
Evaluate patient reported experience measures (PREMs) from pre-treatment to 12-month follow-up using Likert scale
At pre-treatment; and after 10 days, 6- and 12-months of zygomatic implant placement
Pain assessment
Time Frame: 10 days after zygomatic implant placement
Assess patient reported pain at postoperative visit using VAS scale (from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain possible)
10 days after zygomatic implant placement
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 10 days, 6-months and 12-months after zygomatic implant placement
Assess patient satisfaction with function and esthetics using VAS scale (from 0 - not satisfied to 100 fully satisfied
10 days, 6-months and 12-months after zygomatic implant placement
OHIP-21
Time Frame: At pre-treatment and after 10 days, 6-months and 12-months of zygomatic implant placement
Evaluate oral health-related quality of life using OHIP-21 questionnaire from pre-treatment to 12-month follow-up.
At pre-treatment and after 10 days, 6-months and 12-months of zygomatic implant placement
Keratinized mucosa status
Time Frame: At 6-months and 12-months follow-up of zygomatic implant placement

Keratinized mucosa status will be evaluated per zygomatic implant, without the prosthesis in place, and using the following score:

0 =No keratinized mucosa around the implant

  1. =Mucosa surrounding the implant is partially keratinized
  2. = The entire mucosa surrounding the implant is keratinized
At 6-months and 12-months follow-up of zygomatic implant placement
Modified Bleeding Index (mBI)
Time Frame: At 6- and 12-months follow-up of zygomatic implant placement

The mBI will be evaluated at zygomatic implant level, without the prosthesis in place, using the following score system:

0=No bleeding when a periodontal probe is passed along the gingival margin adjacent to the implant

  1. Isolated bleeding spots visible.
  2. Blood forms a confluent red line on the margin.
  3. Heavy or profuse bleeding.
At 6- and 12-months follow-up of zygomatic implant placement
Biological
Time Frame: From implant placement until12-months after implant placement
Biological complications will be recorded
From implant placement until12-months after implant placement
Adverse Events
Time Frame: From implant placement until 12-months after implant placement
All adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), adverse device effects (ADEs), serious adverse device effects (SADEs), device deficiencies (DDs), and unanticipated serious adverse device effects (USADEs) will be recorded from implant placement to the 12-month follow-up.
From implant placement until 12-months after implant placement
Implant survival rate
Time Frame: From time of placement to 12-months follow-up
Evaluate implant survival rate from time of placement to 12-months follow-up
From time of placement to 12-months follow-up
Abutment survival rate
Time Frame: From implant placement to 12-months follow-up
Evaluate abutment survival rate from implant placement to 12-months follow-up
From implant placement to 12-months follow-up
Clinician satisfaction - handling of device
Time Frame: After 10-days of zygomatic implant placement
To evaluate clinician's satisfaction with handling of the device using a VAS scale (from 0-not satisfied to 100-fully satisfied)
After 10-days of zygomatic implant placement
Clinician satisfaction - function and esthetic
Time Frame: At 6-months and 12-months follow-up of zygomatic implant placement
To evaluate clinician's satisfaction with function and esthetics (using VAS scale 0-not satisfied and 100-fully satisfied)
At 6-months and 12-months follow-up of zygomatic implant placement
Technical complications
Time Frame: From zygomatic implant placement until 12.months follow-up
All technical complications will be recorded
From zygomatic implant placement until 12.months follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prosthetic survival
Time Frame: From placement until 12-months follow-up
To evaluate prosthetic survival rate
From placement until 12-months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ewa Bednarek, Nobel Biocare

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared. As per data protection regulation in EU participant's identity should be kept confidential. As per informed consent and GDPR consent, participant is informed that their data will be securely stored in EDC system in EU and analyzed in Switzerland by the sponsor. As per EU and Switzerland data protection regulations, access to participant's data should only be given for the sponsor, regulatory authorities and ethic committee members. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and/or conference presentations. Summary results will be shared (e.g. via publication or posting results in ClinicalTrials.gov)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrophic Maxilla

Subscribe