Tofacitinib for Reduction of Spinal Inflammation in Patients With Psoriatic ArthritiS PresenTing With Axial InvOlvement (PASTOR)

July 23, 2022 updated by: Denis Poddubnyy, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Efficacy of Tofacitinib in Reduction of Inflammation Detected on MRI in Patients With Psoriatic ArthritiS PresenTing With Axial InvOlvement - a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial

To evaluate the efficacy of Tofacitinib in reducing inflammation in the sacroiliac joints and spine on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) with axial Involvement (BASDAI [Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index] ≥ 4 and total backpain ≥ 4 despite treatment with NSAIDs plus evidence of active inflammation in the sacroiliac joints or spine on MRI).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to investigate the efficacy of Tofacitinib in reducing inflammation in the sacroiliac joints and in the spine on MRI in patients with active axial PsA.

Eligible patients (n=80) will be randomized 1:1 to receive either Tofacitinib 5mg orally twice daily or placebo for a 12-week period. After week 12, all patients will receive Tofacitinib 5mg orally twice daily for another 12 weeks. The study duration will include a 6-week screening period, a 24-week treatment period and a safety follow-up period of 4 weeks. Patients will be closely monitored throughout the study on a total of 11 visits. Safety data will be collected in the form of adverse events, vital parameters, physical examinations, and laboratory parameters throughout the study.

The baseline MRI of the whole spine and sacroiliac (SI) joints will be performed within the 6-week screening period to confirm the presence of active inflammation (bone marrow edema) compatible with Spondyloarthritis (will be assessed by a central reader), at week 12 to evaluate the primary study endpoint, and at week 24 to evaluate the secondary endpoint.

The primary study endpoint will be an improvement of the total Berlin MRI score for sacroiliac joints and spine at week 12 as compared to baseline.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Recruiting
        • Charite University, Rheumatology CCM
        • Contact:
          • Sandra Hermann, Dr
      • Berlin, Germany, 12163
        • Recruiting
        • Praxis für Rheumatologie
        • Contact:
          • Kirsten Karberg, Dr
      • Berlin, Germany, 12203
        • Recruiting
        • Charite University - Dept. Rheumatology CBF
        • Contact:
          • Deni Poddubnyy, Prof
      • Berlin-Steglitz, Germany, 12161
        • Recruiting
        • Rheumatol Schwerpunktpraxis
        • Contact:
          • Jan Brandt-Jürgens, PD Dr
      • Düsseldorf, Germany, 40225
        • Recruiting
        • Uniklinik, Forschungszentrum Rheumatologie
        • Contact:
          • Philipp Severin, Dr
      • Ehringshausen, Germany, 35630
        • Recruiting
        • Praxis Dilltal
        • Contact:
          • Mirko Steinmüller, Dr
      • Erlangen, Germany, 91054
        • Recruiting
        • Uniklinikum, Med. Klinik 3
        • Contact:
          • Andreas Ramming, Dr
      • Frankfurt/Main, Germany, 60590
        • Recruiting
        • CIRI Zentrum f innovative Diagnsotik und Therapie
        • Contact:
          • Frank Behrens, Dr
      • Freiburg, Germany, 79106
        • Recruiting
        • Uniklinikum, Dept. Rheumatologie
        • Contact:
          • Stephanie Finzel, Dr
      • Hamburg, Germany, 22391
        • Recruiting
        • Hamburger Rheumaforschungszentrum
        • Contact:
          • Hauke Heintz, Dr
      • Herne, Germany, 44649
        • Recruiting
        • Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet
        • Contact:
          • Uta Kiltz, PD
      • Kiel, Germany, 24105
        • Recruiting
        • Uniklinik, Rheumatologie
        • Contact:
          • Bimba Hoyer, Prof
      • Köln, Germany, 50937
        • Recruiting
        • University Cologne, Dept. Rheumatology
        • Contact:
          • David Kofler, PD
      • Ludwigshafen, Germany, 67063
        • Recruiting
        • Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Rheumatologie
        • Contact:
          • Raoul Bergner, Prof
      • Magdeburg, Germany, 39104
        • Recruiting
        • Rheumapraxis Dr. Sieburg
        • Contact:
          • Maren Sieburg, Dr
      • Magdeburg, Germany, 39110
        • Recruiting
        • Inst. f Präventive Medizin & Klinische Forschung
        • Contact:
          • Rüdiger Möricke, Prof
      • Mainz, Germany, 55131
        • Recruiting
        • Uniklinikum, I. Med. Klinik
        • Contact:
          • Andreas Schwarting, Prof
      • München, Germany, 80935
        • Recruiting
        • Praxis Prof. Kellner
        • Contact:
          • Herbert Kellner, Prof
      • Wuppertal, Germany, 42105
        • Recruiting
        • KH St. Josef, Dept. Rheumatology
        • Contact:
          • Astrid Thiele, Dr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Psoriatic Arthritis fulfilling ClASsification for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) criteria
  • chronic back pain > 3 months
  • BASDAI value ≥ 4 and backpain ≥ 4 / 10 VAS
  • presence of active inflammation in Screening MRI of sacroiliac joints and / or spine (central reading)
  • history of inadequate response to ≥ 2 NSAIDs or intolerance / contraindications

Exclusion Criteria:

  • active current infection, severe infections in the last 3 months
  • history of recurrent Herpes zoster or disseminated Herpes simplex
  • immunodeficiency
  • chronic Hepatitis B, C or HIV infection
  • women: pregnant or lactating (have to practice reliable method of contraception)
  • other severe diseases conflicting with a clinical study, contraindications for MRI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Tofacitinib
5 mg oral BID
verum tablets
Other Names:
  • Xeljanz
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
matching Placebo BID
tablets containing placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MRI Berlin Score
Time Frame: Week 12 vs Baseline
Improvement of the Berlin MRI score for sacroiliac joints and spine. Scoring includes spinal inflammation (Lucas C et al, J Rheumatol 2007): 23 vertebral units with semiquantitative range of inflammation between 0 to 3 (min. score = 0, max. score = 69, the higher the worse). Additionally, inflammation of the sacroiliac joints is scored (Hermann KG, Rheumatologe 2004; scoring each quadrant between 0 and 4, max. score 16, the higher, the worse).
Week 12 vs Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) response criteria
Time Frame: Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society Response Criteria (Anderson JJ, Arthritis Rheum 2001): change in percent of at least 3 of 4 subcores (Patient Global VAS, Pain VAS, BASFI and BASDAI questions 5&6).
Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Responses in ASAS Health Index
Time Frame: Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society ASAS Health Index (Kiltz U, Ann Rheum Dis 2015). Consisting of 17 questions answered, calculated in percent (100 % = best spondylarthritis related health).
Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Responses in ASDAS
Time Frame: Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) combining 3 questions VAS (back pain, peripheral pain and morning stiffness) with CRP or ESR; formulas used as described in Lucas C, Ann Rheum Dis 2009. Values <1.3 inactive disease, <2.1 low disease activity, 2.1-3.5 high disease activity, >3.5 very high disease activity.
Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Responses in BASDAI
Time Frame: Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). Calculated score from 6 questions VAS; range 0-10, the higher the worse.
Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Responses in BASFI
Time Frame: Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI). Mean of 10 questions VAS, range 0-10; higher value = more impaired function.
Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Responses in BASMI(lin)
Time Frame: Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index - linear score (BASMI; van der Heijde Ann Rheum Dis 2008). Measuring Schober´s test (cm), intermalleolar distance (cm), cervical rotation (degree), lateral lumbar flexion (cm) and tragus-to-wall-distance (cm) and calculate the score as reported in the citation.
Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Responses in HAQ-DI
Time Frame: Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI; Princus T, Arthritis Rheum 1983) measuring influence of arthritis on quality of life. Patient questionnaire recalculated in scores 0 to 3, higher = worse.
Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Responses in Patient Global Score
Time Frame: Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Patient Global Score of overall disease activity - VAS 0-10 (higher = worse)
Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Responses in Physician Global Score
Time Frame: Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Physician Global Score of overall disease activity - VAS 0-10 (higher = worse).
Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Responses in DAPSA
Time Frame: Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Disease Activity in PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA; Schoels M, Arthritis Rheum 2010); calculated by summing swollen joint count (max. 66) + tender joint count (max. 68) + patient pain VAS + patient global assessments VAS + CRP. Value ranges 0 to >28 (the higher, the worse).
Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Responses in PASI
Time Frame: Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) - description of skin involvement regarding scaling, redness, thickness and body surface area. Range 0-72.
Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Responses in MASES
Time Frame: Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES;Heuft-Dorenbosch Ann Rheum Dis 2003). Assessing 13 clinical enthesial sites (yes / no). Range 0-13.
Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Response in CRP
Time Frame: Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
C-reactive protein (CRP, mg per litre)
Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Response in ESR
Time Frame: Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR, mm per 1 hour)
Week 12 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
MRI Berlin Score
Time Frame: Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12
Improvement of the Berlin MRI score (description see primary outcome) for sacroiliac joints and spine
Week 24 vs Baseline, Week 24 vs Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Denis Poddubnyy, Prof, Charite University, Dept. Rheumatology CBF

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 4, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spondylitis

Clinical Trials on Tofacitinib 5 MG Oral Tablet [Xeljanz]

Subscribe