Determinants of Health and Cancer: Investigating the Conceptions of Children From 6 to 11 Years Old (FCE)

August 21, 2019 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Model and map, from a qualitative multi-phased protocol, the conceptions and systems of conceptions of the determinants of health and cancer expressed and perceived by schoolchildren aged 6 to 11 years. The secondary objectives are to analyze the ability to question the conceptions of children's health regardless of their age and to link conceptions and determinants to contextual factors. The informative value and complementarity of the collection tools (photo expression, QC, photo-narration) and the relevance of a mixed analysis methodology (qualitative and quantitative) in order to highlight the different determinants of health will also be studied.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Qualitative observational study of human and social sciences (SHS), multicenter, conducted with schoolchildren.

The qualitative methodology used combines the use of photographs, open questionnaires and focus groups, over very large panels, aiming at both diversity and representativeness.

  • Photo expression: to identify the determinants perceived as having a positive or negative influence on one's health;
  • CQR : Certainty/Question/Rumour on how to take care of one's health (health promotion input following on from school policies, i.e. PES: Politique d'Etablissements Scolaires);
  • Photo narration: to identify argumentative frameworks in health and alternatives perceived as being positive or negative for one's health,
  • Focus groups: to improve understanding of the rationalities built by adolescents in relation to that which determines their health.

This choice is justified by the need to explore and understand the actions from the participants' point of view.

The diversity of schools and pupils (5 classes in 4 schools in the AURA region, i.e. 320 pupils) will make it possible to obtain the data saturation required in qualitative research.

This makes it possible to consider a mixed analysis strategy, both qualitative and quantitative.

This project aims to better understand the rationalities elaborated by children and the way in which their concepts on the determinants of cancer interlink, as well as to describe the declared impact these concepts have on the decision-making regarding their health.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

320

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63000
        • Recruiting
        • Lise LACLAUTRE
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Frank PIZON, MCF HDR
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Laurent GERBAUD, PU PH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 11 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

chidren

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • School volunteering to participate in the project Primary school
  • children aged 6 to 11
  • Girls and boys
  • All school levels Private and public primary school
  • Rural and urban primary school

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Class ULIS
  • Students who benefit from a personalized support plan
  • Individual refusal of participation (child and / or family)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
categorized groups by genre according to the Relation to the environment criteria
Time Frame: day 1
The analysis of the content will be carried out according to the ascending / descending method by categorization, described by Laurence Bardin. According to L. Bardin (2013), categorization is an operation of classification of elements constituting a set by differentiation then grouping by genre (analogy) according to previously defined criteria.
day 1
categorized groups by genre according to a Factors of fulfillment and personal development criteria
Time Frame: day 1
The analysis of the content will be carried out according to the ascending / descending method by categorization, described by Laurence Bardin. According to L. Bardin (2013), categorization is an operation of classification of elements constituting a set by differentiation then grouping by genre (analogy) according to previously defined criteria.
day 1
categorized groups by genre according to the link with a healt theme criteria
Time Frame: day 1
The analysis of the content will be carried out according to the ascending / descending method by categorization, described by Laurence Bardin. According to L. Bardin (2013), categorization is an operation of classification of elements constituting a set by differentiation then grouping by genre (analogy) according to previously defined criteria.
day 1
categorized groups by genre according to Care activities criteria
Time Frame: day 1
The analysis of the content will be carried out according to the ascending / descending method by categorization, described by Laurence Bardin. According to L. Bardin (2013), categorization is an operation of classification of elements constituting a set by differentiation then grouping by genre (analogy) according to previously defined criteria.
day 1
categorized groups by genre according to a Recommendation and support in health in the social sphere criteria
Time Frame: day 1
The analysis of the content will be carried out according to the ascending / descending method by categorization, described by Laurence Bardin. According to L. Bardin (2013), categorization is an operation of classification of elements constituting a set by differentiation then grouping by genre (analogy) according to previously defined criteria.
day 1
categorized groups by genre according to an health capital criteria
Time Frame: day 1
The analysis of the content will be carried out according to the ascending / descending method by categorization, described by Laurence Bardin. According to L. Bardin (2013), categorization is an operation of classification of elements constituting a set by differentiation then grouping by genre (analogy) according to previously defined criteria.
day 1
categorized groups by genre according to the emotional dimension in social relations criteria
Time Frame: day 1
The analysis of the content will be carried out according to the ascending / descending method by categorization, described by Laurence Bardin. According to L. Bardin (2013), categorization is an operation of classification of elements constituting a set by differentiation then grouping by genre (analogy) according to previously defined criteria.
day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of children able to explain their health regardless of their age
Time Frame: Day 1
The informative value and complementarity of the collection tools (photo The informative value are measured with collection tools (photo expression, photo-narration) and a mixed analysis methodology (qualitative and quantitative) is used in order to highlight the different determinants of health.
Day 1
Incidence of children able to explain their health regardless of their contextual factors
Time Frame: Day 1
The informative value are measured with collection tools (photo expression, photo-narration) and a mixed analysis methodology (qualitative and quantitative) is used in order to highlight the different determinants of health.
Day 1
Identify child profile
Time Frame: Day 1

Identify child profiles / classes / school based :• Socio-demographic data (class / age, sex, class size, number of male and female, school enrollment, class number, geographical location, priority education, team stability, health project, type of project, impression of researchers)

• Domains or designs: Individual & collective Domains created during the qualitative analysis

Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 31, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019 FCE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

3
Subscribe