ESP vs QL for Total Abdominal Hysterectomy

March 31, 2023 updated by: John Alexander, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Quadratus Lumborum (QL) Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine for Postoperative Pain Management After Open Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Patients undergoing open total abdominal hysterectomy (n=82) at Parkland Memorial Hospital will be randomized into one of two groups to receive either ultrasound-guided bilateral ESP block with liposomal bupivacaine (Group 1) or ultrasound-guided bilateral QL block with liposomal bupivacaine (Group 2) for postoperative pain management. The remaining aspect of perioperative care, including the general anesthetic technique and postoperative care will be standardized and will be similar for all patients. The duration of the involvement in the study will be until 72 hours postoperatively. Anesthesia providers will identify potential subjects during their Pre-Anesthesia Evaluation Clinic visit and/or Day Surgery Unit pre-anesthetic assessment. There will be no incentive or payment to the patients.

Patients in Group 1 will receive ultrasound-guided bilateral ESP block in the preoperative holding area prior to surgery. Patients in Group 2 will receive ultrasound-guided QL block in the preoperative holding area prior to surgery. All patients will have general anesthesia per previously established Parkland Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols. Postoperatively, patients in both Groups will receive acetaminophen 1000 mg orally every 8 hours, meloxicam 15 mg orally every 24 hours, and immediate-release oxycodone 5 - 10mg orally every 4 hours as needed for breakthrough pain.

The postoperative analgesia will be documented using the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10 scale where 0=no pain and 10=worst pain). In addition, total opioid dose over the 72-hours study period will be documented. Postoperative nausea will be measured using a categorical scoring system (none=0, mild=1, moderate=2, severe=3) and episodes of vomiting will be documented. Rescue anti-emetics will be given to any patient who complains of nausea and/or vomiting. All variables will be assessed at 4, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours, postoperatively by an investigator blinded to group allocation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators will study 82 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1-3 subjects scheduled for open Total Abdominal Hysterectomy who will be identified by anesthesia providers during their Pre-Anesthesia Evaluation Clinic visit and/or Day Surgery Unit pre-anesthetic assessment at Parkland Hospital. If the subjects agree to participate in the study, the researchers will determine eligibility. If the subject meets all inclusion/exclusion criteria, the subject will be asked to sign the Consent Form and HIPAA Authorization Form prior to any study procedures in a face-to-face meeting with the researchers.

Protected patient information will include name, medical record number, date of birth, and contact information including telephone number. Height and weight will also be recorded. All patients will receive a standardized general anesthetic based on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols. One of the investigators will randomly allocate patients using computer generated randomization schedule to one of the two groups.

Study Groups:

Group 1: Ultrasound-guided ESP block with liposomal bupivacaine

Group 2: Ultrasound-guided QL block with liposomal bupivacaine.

Anesthesiologists with previous experience in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia procedures will perform the block based on randomization results. In both groups the patient will be placed in a sitting position, a SonoSite X-Porte linear ultrasound transducer will be used for real-time ultrasound guidance.

Group 1: For the QL block, the transducer will be placed transversely over the lumbar spine at the level of the iliac crest. Then, the anesthesiologist will scan laterally to identify the ipsilateral L3 transverse process, psoas muscle, and quadratus lumborum muscle to identify the "Shamrock Sign" (7). Following aseptic preparation of the injection site and the ultrasound probe, a 22-gauge, 10mm block needle will be introduced parallel to the ultrasound guided beam (in-plane technique) until its tip reaches the plane between the quadratus lumborum muscle and psoas muscle. After negative aspiration, 20 ml of a mixture containing 10ml 0.25% bupivacaine and 10ml 1.3% liposomal bupivacaine will be injected in 5 ml increments to separate the fascial plane between the two muscles. The investigators will observe local anesthetic spread under real-time imaging. The block will then be performed in the same manner on the opposite site.

Group 2: For the ESP block, the transducer will be placed parasagittally at the level of the tip of the scapula and the anesthesiologist will scan in a craniocaudal manner to identify the ipsilateral T10 transverse process and overlying erector spinae muscle. Following aseptic preparation of the injection site and the ultrasound probe, a 22-gauge, 10mm block needle will be introduced parallel to the ultrasound guided beam (in-plane technique) until its tip reaches the plane between the erector spinae muscle and transverse process. After negative aspiration, 20 ml of a mixture containing 10ml 0.25% bupivacaine and 10ml 1.3% liposomal bupivacaine will be injected in 5 ml increments to separate the fascial plane between the muscle and transverse process. The investigators will observe local anesthetic spread under real-time imaging. The block will then be performed in the same manner on the opposite site.

A standard postoperative analgesic regimen in both groups will include acetaminophen 1000 mg, orally every 8 hours and meloxicam 15mg, orally every 24 hours. For breakthrough pain (or rescue), immediate-release oxycodone 5-10mg, orally every 4 hours as needed for pain will be provided.

The efficacy of postoperative analgesia will be documented in all patients using the visual analog score (0=no pain, 10=worst pain). In addition, total morphine dose over the 72-hours study period will be documented. Postoperative nausea will be measured using a categorical scoring system (none=0, mild=1, moderate=2, severe=3) and episodes of vomiting will be documented. Rescue antiemetics will be given to any patient who complains of nausea or vomiting. All variables will be assessed at 4, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively by an investigator blinded to group allocation.

For each patient the following data will be recorded:

Preoperatively:

  • Age
  • Gender
  • Height
  • Weight
  • Baseline pain score
  • Pre-operative block procedure, duration, amount of analgesia used
  • Time to perform the blocks

Intraoperatively:

• Surgical time

Postoperatively:

  • Post-Anesthesia Care Unit time
  • Post-operative pain scores at 4, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours
  • cumulative opioid consumption during the first 24-hours postoperatively
  • Time to first ambulation
  • Time to first oral intake
  • Time to be ready for discharge home

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

17

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • Parkland Health and Hospital System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female ASA physical status 1-3 scheduled for open abdominal hysterectomy
  • Age 18-80 years old
  • Able to participate personally or by legal representative in informed consent in English or Spanish

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of relevant drug allergy
  • Age less than 18 or greater than 80 years
  • Chronic opioid use or drug abuse
  • Active use of anticoagulant medication
  • Significant psychiatric disturbance
  • Inability to understand the study protocol
  • Refusal to provide written consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ultrasound-guided ESP block with liposomal bupivacaine
For the ESP block, the transducer will be placed parasagittally at the level of the tip of the scapula and the anesthesiologist will scan in a craniocaudal manner to identify the ipsilateral T10 transverse process and overlying erector spinae muscle. Following aseptic preparation of the injection site and the ultrasound probe, a 22-gauge, 10mm block needle will be introduced parallel to the ultrasound guided beam (in-plane technique) until its tip reaches the plane between the erector spinae muscle and transverse process. After negative aspiration, 20 ml of a mixture containing 10ml 0.25% bupivacaine and 10ml 1.3% liposomal bupivacaine will be injected in 5 ml increments to separate the fascial plane between the muscle and transverse process. The investigators will observe local anesthetic spread under real-time imaging. The block will then be performed in the same manner on the opposite site.
The Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block is a new block first described in 2016 which blocks terminal branches of the lower thoracic and lumbar nerve roots. It is performed by injection of local anesthetic in the fascial plane below the erector spinae muscle group.
Active Comparator: Ultrasound-guided QL block with liposomal bupivacaine
For the QL block, the transducer will be placed transversely over the lumbar spine at the level of the iliac crest. Then, the anesthesiologist will scan laterally to identify the ipsilateral L3 transverse process, psoas muscle, and quadratus lumborum muscle to identify the "Shamrock Sign" (7). Following aseptic preparation of the injection site and the ultrasound probe, a 22-gauge, 10mm block needle will be introduced parallel to the ultrasound guided beam (in-plane technique) until its tip reaches the plane between the quadratus lumborum muscle and psoas muscle. After negative aspiration, 20 ml of a mixture containing 10ml 0.25% bupivacaine and 10ml 1.3% liposomal bupivacaine will be injected in 5 ml increments to separate the fascial plane between the two muscles. The investigators will observe local anesthetic spread under real-time imaging. The block will then be performed in the same manner on the opposite site.
Ultrasound-guided QL block has been reported to provide effective analgesia in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgical procedures, including in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Ultrasound guidance offers a number of advantages, including the ability to visualize the anatomy, perform real-time navigation, and direct observation of local anesthetic spread. The QL block is performed via ultrasound-guided injection of local anesthetic in the fascial planes above or below the QL muscle

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain (NRS = numeric rating scale) at 24 hours
Time Frame: 24 hours
The primary aim of this study is to compare postoperative pain scores at 24 hours between the subjects who receive ESP block with liposomal bupivacaine and the subjects who receive QL block with liposomal bupivacaine undergoing Total Abdominal Hysterectomy. The investigators will use the Numeric Rating Scale, measuring patient report of pain from 0 = no pain up to 10 = worst possible pain.
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain (NRS = numeric rating scale) at 48 hours
Time Frame: 48 hours
One secondary objectives is to compare pain scores at 48 hours. The investigators will use the Numeric Rating Scale, measuring patient report of pain from 0 = no pain up to 10 = worst possible pain.
48 hours
Postoperative Pain (NRS = numeric rating scale) at 72 hours
Time Frame: 72 hours
Another secondary objective is to compare pain scores at 48 hours and 72 hours. The investigators will use the Numeric Rating Scale, measuring patient report of pain from 0 = no pain up to 10 = worst possible pain.
72 hours
Opioid Use (oral morphine equivalents)
Time Frame: 24 hours
Another secondary objective is to assess cumulative opioid consumption during the first 24-hours postoperatively. The investigators will convert all opioids consumed in this time from to oral morphine equivalents.
24 hours
Block Time (minutes)
Time Frame: 1 hour
Antoher secondary objective is to assess the time to perform the blocks as measured in minutes.
1 hour
Ambulation Time (hours:minutes)
Time Frame: 24 hours
Another secondary objective is to assess the time to first ambulation as measured in hours:minutes after the end of surgery.
24 hours
Oral Intake Time (hours:minutes)
Time Frame: 24 hours
Another secondary objective is to assess the time to first oral intake as measured in hours:minutes after the end of surgery.
24 hours
Discharge Readiness Time (hours:minutes)
Time Frame: 72 hours
Another secondary objective is to assess the time time for discharge readiness as measured in hours:minutes after the end of surgery.
72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John C Alexander, MD, UT Southwestern

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 20, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 21, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual Participant Data will not be shared

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Erector Spinae Plane block

3
Subscribe