Mobility Impairment in the Northern Region of Malawi

July 10, 2023 updated by: Rachel Thompson, MD, University of California, Los Angeles

Coupling the Surveillance of Mobility Impaired Adults With Large-Scale Assistive Device Donations and the Suitability of the Long-Term Use of Lofstrand (Forearm) Versus Axillary (Underarm) Crutches Among Mobility Impaired Adults in the Northern Region of Malawi

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether Lofstrand or axillary crutches are better suited to treat mobility impairments and improve physical activity levels in rural, resource-limited, settings like the Northern Region of Malawi. To do this, we are proposing the implementation of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to measure and compare the physical activity and satisfaction of mobility aid recipients sorted into two groups - one receiving a set of Lofstrand crutches (Group 1) and the other a set of axillary crutches (Group 2). Changes in physical activity, disability, and life satisfaction levels will measured with a follow-up data collection period conducted one year after the distribution of the devices.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Detailed Description

STAGE 1 - BASELINE DATA COLLECTION:

  • Potential participants will be identified at outreach clinics in the Mzimba, Rumphi, and Nkhata Bay Districts for participation in the study.
  • Potential participants will take the Washington Group Extended Set Questions on Disability (WGES) and those that meet a baseline level of disability/mobility impairment - validated by physiotherapist opinion - are invited to participate in the study.
  • 100 or more participants (50+ per group) who fulfill the inclusion criteria will be selected for participation.
  • Participants will complete a Demographic Survey to determine their age, gender, health barriers, social determinants of health etc.
  • Participants will complete the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) to determine a baseline of their physical activity.
  • Participants will complete the PROMIS Satisfaction with Participation in Social Roles - Short Form 8a (SPSR) and General Life Satisfaction (Ages 18+) - Fixed Form A (GLS) questionnaires to determine a baseline of their overall life satisfaction.
  • Treatment groups will be randomized through the use of randomization envelopes.
  • Selected devices, as determined in the randomization process, will be distributed to participants in each treatment group.
  • The addresses/villages of residences of selected participants will be recorded and marked manually on a detailed satellite map. A list of study participants will be provided to the local Health Surveillance Assistant (HSA) for record keeping and monitoring purposes. (HSAs have intimate knowledge of the communities they serve and will be useful partners to help find participants in the follow-up stages of the trial.)

STAGE 2 - ONE-YEAR FOLLOW-UP DATA COLLECTION:

  • Participants will be located using the assistance of the local HSA, address records, and map markings from Stage 1.
  • Participants will complete follow-up SPSR, GLS, WGES and GPAQ questionnaires, and will complete the Crutch Satisfaction Survey.
  • Reports of missing and damaged crutches will be taken.

STAGE 3 - DATA ANALYSIS:

The two study groups will be compared using the following metrics:

  • Stratified by level of disability based on Washington Group Extended Set Questions on Disability
  • Changes in GLS and SPSR scores between baseline and follow-up data collection will be used to determine changes in participants' overall life satisfaction.
  • Changes in Global Physical Activity Questionnaire scores between baseline and follow-up data collection will be used to determine changes in participants' mobility impairments and day-to-day activity levels.
  • Scores from the Crutch Satisfaction Survey will be used determine participants' subjective experiences with their respective mobility devices.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90007
        • Orthopaedic Institute for Children

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Persons fluent in English, Tumbuka, and/or Chichewa.
  • Persons diagnosed with a moderate to severe mobility impairment and/or lower extremity disabilities as determined by the WGES Questions on Disability.
  • Persons untreated or undertreated for mobility impairment. We consider undertreated persons as those treating their mobility impairments with self-made devices (i.e. wooden crutches or walking sticks), or with devices considered lower than standard of care for their level of impairment (i.e. using a cane instead of crutches).
  • Persons who are candidates for both axillary and Lofstrand crutch treatment - as determined by gait analysis conducted by local physiotherapists.
  • Persons accessing one of the following 15 outreach distribution clinics located throughout the Mzimba, Rumphi, and Nkhata Bay Districts: Mzuzu Central Hospital, Ekwendeni Mission Hospital, Mtwalo Health Centre, Rumphi MAP Office, Bolero Health Centre, Hewe Health Centre, Livingstonia Mission Hospital, Mhuju Health Centre, Mzimba District Hospital, Jenda Health Centre, Nkhata Bay District Hospital, Mpamba Health Centre, Maula Health Centre, Chintheche Health Centre, and Kande Health Centre.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Persons diagnosed with degenerative conditions that may lead to further deterioration in mobility between data collection periods (i.e. ALS, Muscular Dystrophy, Corticobasal Degeneration etc.)
  • Persons with developmental delays that will preclude them from participation in any of the surveys
  • Persons with upper extremity disabilities that may preclude them from using crutches.
  • Persons who are not permanent residents of the area or have any plans on moving out of the area.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Lofstrand Crutches
This group is given a set of Lofstrand crutches.
Device: Set of Lofstrand Crutches
Active Comparator: Axillary Crutches
This group is given a set of axillary crutches.
Device: Set of Axillary Crutches

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in scores between baseline and follow-up from the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (QPAQ)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 year
Questionnaire used to measure the patient's self reported level of physical activity. There are 16 questions total. The majority of the questions are binary, but there are a few questions that include a measurement of time (in minutes, hours, and days). There is a numerical output.
Baseline and 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in scores between baseline and follow-up from the PROMIS Satisfaction with Participation in Social Roles (SPSR) survey
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 year
Questionnaire used to measure the patient's self reported level of satisfaction with current social roles. There are 7 ordinal type questions, each with 5 different rating options to choose from. There is a numerical output.
Baseline and 1 year
Change in scores between baseline and follow-up from the PROMIS General Life Satisfaction (GLS) survey
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 year
Questionnaire used to measure the patient's self reported level of satisfaction with general life satisfaction. There are 7 ordinal type questions, each with 5 different rating options to choose from. There is a numerical output.
Baseline and 1 year
Satisfaction Survey
Time Frame: 1 year
Questionnaire used to measure the patient's self reported satisfaction with their assigned devices. There is a numerical output.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rachel M Thompson, MD, UCLA/OIC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 19-000773

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mobility Limitation

Clinical Trials on Lofstrand Crutches

3
Subscribe