Biomechanical Changes in Women With Post-partum Pelvic Girdle Pain: An Observational Case-control Study

September 17, 2024 updated by: rovan mohamed saad elbesh, Cairo University
Research suggests that changes in pelvic alignment during the perinatal period are the primary cause of pelvic girdle pain (PGP), both perinatally and postnatally. Researchers also report an association between temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) and changes in lumbopelvic alignment. There are, however, no reports investigating temporomandibular joint disorders or changes in biomechanical alignment among women with postpartum pelvic girdle pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Research suggests that changes in pelvic alignment during the perinatal period are the primary cause of pelvic girdle pain (PGP), both perinatally and postnatally. Researchers also report an association between temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) and changes in lumbopelvic alignment. There are, however, no reports investigating temporomandibular joint disorders or changes in biomechanical alignment among women with postpartum pelvic girdle pain.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Giza, Egypt
        • Rovan Elbesh

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

75 women will participate in this study, The selected cases divide into a study group(A) included 44 women who have CPP and group (B) included 31 women of the participants were normal and considered the control group. They will be selected from outpatient clinic of obstetrics and Gynaecology department in El-Hosary family health Centre.

All participants will be given a full explanation of the protocol of the study and informed consent form will be signed from each subject before participating in the study (

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- The age of the participants will be ranged from 20 to 40 years. Their body mass index will be ranged from 20 to 25 kg/m2. They will have regular menstrual cycle. They will not receive any hormonal therapy or taking any regular drugs

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bone disease. Discogenic state with radiculopathy or not. Systemic disease of musculoskeletal system. Any sensory problems. Previous vertebral fractures. Major spinal structural abnormality. Major jaw abnormality. Any jaw orthotics or prosthesis. Missing teeth.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Study group (group A)

Maximal vertical mouth opening (MIO):

From sitting position, with the use of the calliper, the distance between the incisal edges along the midline of the upper and lower central incisors without pain was measured, by placing one end of the poley gauge against the incisal edge of one of the upper central incisors, and the other end against the incisal edge of the opposing lower incisor.

The distance recorded in millimetres, the subjects was instructed to" open your mouth as wide as possible without causing pain or discomfort". The poley gauge was sterilized with antiseptic solution before and after each measure Postpartum pain Intervention 'Visual analogue scale'

diagnostic test
test
test TMJ /pelvic angle/lumber angle
Control group (group B):

Maximal vertical mouth opening (MIO):

From sitting position, with the use of the calliper, the distance between the incisal edges along the midline of the upper and lower central incisors without pain was measured, by placing one end of the poley gauge against the incisal edge of one of the upper central incisors, and the other end against the incisal edge of the opposing lower incisor.

The distance recorded in millimetres, the subjects was instructed to" open your mouth as wide as possible without causing pain or discomfort". The poley gauge was sterilized with antiseptic solution before and after each measure Postpartum pain Intervention 'Visual analogue scale'

diagnostic test
test
test TMJ /pelvic angle/lumber angle

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
body mass index
Time Frame: 3 months
BMI in kg/m^2
3 months
Pelvic tilt in degrees:
Time Frame: 3 months
The blocks are released and the rods are placed over the crest of the ilium. The blocks are then pressed firmly toward the midline. Read the angle from the level. If the gauge reads over 21/2°, the result is listed as positive.Anterior pelvic tilting angle: PALM was used for measuring pelvic tilting angle. A mark was put on a point just inferior to ASIS; another mark was put just inferior to PSIS. The callipers of the PALM were put on these two points
3 months
jaw movement
Time Frame: 3 months

lateral deviation mouth opening (MIO):

From sitting position, with the use of the calliper, the distance between the incisal edges along the midline of the upper and lower central incisors without pain was measured, by placing one end of the poley gauge against the incisal edge of one of the upper central incisors, and the other end against the incisal edge of the opposing lower incisor.

The distance recorded in millimeters, the subjects was instructed to" open your mouth as wide as possible without causing pain or discomfort". The poley gauge was sterilized with antiseptic solution before and after each measure

3 months
Spinal curves Measurement
Time Frame: 3 months
lumber angle-pelvic inclination by mm
3 months
Satisfaction assessed by the VAS
Time Frame: 3 months
Degrees of pain will be assessed using a VAS, which was a method of representing subjects' pain on a 10 cm linear scale. Score of 0 meant 'no pain' and 10 meant 'worst pain'. Tomeasure specific symptoms, such as the s
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 8, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 5, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postpartum Pain

Clinical Trials on diagnostic test

Subscribe