The Effect of a Curriculum-based Physical Activity Intervention on Physical Activity in Schoolchildren

October 4, 2019 updated by: Alison Innerd, Teesside University

The Effect of a Curriculum-based Physical Activity Intervention on Accelerometer-assessed Physical Activity in Schoolchildren: a Non-randomised Mixed Methods Controlled Before-and-after Study

A non-randomised mixed methods controlled before-and-after study. The study evaluated the effects of a classroom-based physical activity intervention in primary school children on physical activity. Two schools were allocated to deliver the classroom-based intervention for eight weeks, and three schools continued with their usual school routine.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary aim of this study was to test the feasibility and potential effect of a classroom-based, curriculum-embedded intervention - ExCiTE; Exercise Classes in the Teaching Environment- on total physical activity and moderate to vigorous physical activity. The secondary aim was to measure and describe health-related quality of life and physical fitness components, and to gain understanding of the experiences, views and attitudes towards the ExCiTE intervention among participating children and schoolteachers.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

152

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 11 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Parental Consent
  • Child Assent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Respiratory infections; or.

    • Condition of injury affecting child's ability to undertake exercise
    • Allergic to sticky tape

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Group
Teacher delivered a 10 minute classroom-based physical activity on school days for eight weeks.
Other: Control Group
Children in the control schools continued with their usual school routine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Amount of time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA)
Time Frame: Accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X) worn for 7 days. Analysed using Evenson cutpoints.
Daily moderate to vigorous physical activity (minutes) collected by wearing an accelerometer for 7 consecutive days.
Accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X) worn for 7 days. Analysed using Evenson cutpoints.
Total physical activity
Time Frame: Accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X) worn on the hip for 7 consecutive days. Analysed using Evenson cutpoints
Total physical activity measured by counts per minute
Accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X) worn on the hip for 7 consecutive days. Analysed using Evenson cutpoints

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Aerobic Fitness
Time Frame: 1 Day of testing
Aerobic Endurance. Multistage fitness test
1 Day of testing
Health-Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: Recall questionnaire. Questionnaire completed on one day of testing
27 -item KIDSCREEN questionnaire. Assesses health-related quality of life across five dimensions: physical well-being, psychological well-being, parent relations and autonomy, social support and peers and school environment. Likert Scale 1-5. Test completed at baseline, post-intervention and 4 weeks follow up
Recall questionnaire. Questionnaire completed on one day of testing

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fitness Test:Balance
Time Frame: Balance for 30 seconds on each leg. Test completed on one day of testing. Participants balances on one leg on a beam for 30 seconds. The number of times the participants has to put the foot on the floor during the 30 seconds is the score.
Flamingo balance test (from Eurofit Protocol). Stand on a wooden beam for 30 seconds and try to balance for 30 seconds. Complete with each foot
Balance for 30 seconds on each leg. Test completed on one day of testing. Participants balances on one leg on a beam for 30 seconds. The number of times the participants has to put the foot on the floor during the 30 seconds is the score.
Fitness Test:Flexibility
Time Frame: Best of three attempts on one day of testing.
Sit and reach test. Sit against the sit and reach box, lean forwards and stretch as far forward as possible. Measured to the nearest cm. The higher the number, the better the flexbility.
Best of three attempts on one day of testing.
Fitness Test: Speed Fitness Test: Speed
Time Frame: one attempt on one day of testing.
10 x 5m shuttle run (from Eurofit Protocol). Run between two cones 5m apart 10 times. The lower the score, the better
one attempt on one day of testing.
Fitness Test: Hand Eye Coordination
Time Frame: Best of three attempts, one one day of testing. Time is recorded. The faster the time the better the hand eye coordination
Plate tapping - tap the hand on two different colour spots - using the dominant hand.
Best of three attempts, one one day of testing. Time is recorded. The faster the time the better the hand eye coordination
Fitness Test: Explosive Strength
Time Frame: Best of three attempts, one one day of testing. Distance is recorded. The further the distance the better the explosive strength
Standing broad jump. Jump as far forwards as possible keeping both feet together. The measurement is taken from the heel on the furthest back landing foot
Best of three attempts, one one day of testing. Distance is recorded. The further the distance the better the explosive strength
Fitness Test: muscular strength and endurance
Time Frame: One day of testing. The number of sit ups completed in 30 seconds. The higher the number equates to a better performance
Sit up on a mat (from Eurofit Protocol)
One day of testing. The number of sit ups completed in 30 seconds. The higher the number equates to a better performance

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TU2019

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physical Activity

Clinical Trials on Control Group

Subscribe