- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04119739
Pain Reduction Produced by Different Treatments in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
December 3, 2025 updated by: Francisco Unda Solano
Pain Reduction Produced by Physiotherapy, Ibuprofen Arginine, and the Absence of Treatment, in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Pain reduction effects of the median nerve neural mobilization technique (a physiotherapy treatment) will be compared to those produced by a pharmaceutical treatment and the absence of treatment, in subjects who suffer carpal tunnel syndrome.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The present randomized clinical trial will perform a comparison of the pain reduction effects produced by the application of median nerve neural mobilization (non invasive and non pharmaceutical physiotherapy treatment), to the pain reduction effect produced by an oral ibuprofen treatment or the lack of treatment (waiting list control group) in subjects diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome.
Additionally, effects over the functionality of the affected upper limb will be evaluated and compared.
Subjects will be invited to participate and randomly allocated to 3 different groups.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
117
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Carabobo
-
Valencia, Carabobo, Venezuela, 02001
- Ciudad Hospitalaria Enrique Tejera
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants must be medically diagnosed with unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (with confirmative electrodiagnostic findings).
- Full understanding of written and spoken Spanish (language).
- Participants must freely consent to participate.
- The presence of positive Phalen and Tinel signs.
- The presence of carpal tunnel syndrome signs and symptoms
Exclusion Criteria:
The lack to meet inclusion criterions, the presence of cognitive impairment.
- Tumors
- Cancer
- Upper limb surgery or trauma
- Pregnancy
- Deformities of the (affected) upper limb
- Recent skin injuries or infections (in the affected upper limb)
- Autoimmune inflammatory conditions or flu type symptoms.
- Allergy to gabapentin, ibuprofen or ibuprofen arginine
- Participants must not be (during the present investigation) under any type of pain reducing treatment (conservative, homeopathic, invasive or not invasive).
- Metabolic neuropathy.
- Obesity (body mass index over 30).
- Participants who are not employed.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Median nerve neural mobilization
Non pharmaceutical, non invasive, physiotherapy technique; which consists of a passive and repetitive upper limb movement that seeks to induced median nerve gliding and incursions against surrounding connective tissue.
Subjects will be treated 5 days per week during a total time lapse of 4 weeks.
|
Manual therapy maneuver performed in the upper limb.
|
|
No Intervention: Control group
Waiting list control group.
Participants that belong to the no intervention arm will be assigned to a waiting list to receive treatment.
The participants will not receive treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome during a time lapse of 4 weeks.
After this period of time, participants will begin the best treatment available.
|
|
|
Active Comparator: Ibuprofen Arginine
Oral tablet pharmaceutical treatment.
Participants will be treated with a maximum of 1200 mg per day, subdivided in 3 intakes of 400 mg each 8 hours during a time lapse of 4 weeks.
|
Oral tablets
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Distal upper limb pain
Time Frame: Changes from baseline (measured immediately before the application of the first treatment) and 40 minutes after the application of the last treatment.
|
Assessed through the visual analog scale (VAS).
The VAS is a psychometric response scale.
It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured.The VAS is the most frequently used method to assess pain intensity.
The scale will be displayed as a horizontal 10-cm line labelled at each end by descriptors such as 'no pain' (the minimum and best outcome possible) and 'worse pain ever' (maximum and worst outcome possible).
The participant will mark the line to indicate pain severity and it is simply quantified by measuring the distance in centimeters from 0 (no pain) to the patient's marked rating.
|
Changes from baseline (measured immediately before the application of the first treatment) and 40 minutes after the application of the last treatment.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Upper limb function
Time Frame: Changes from baseline (measured immediately before the application of the first treatment) and at 40 minutes after the application of the last treatment.
|
Assessed through the Quick- Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick- DASH) questionary, which is a shortened version of the 30-item Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) instrument.
The instrument administered to the participants will be a self-report questionnaire, that will rate the difficulty and interference of daily life on a 5 point Likert scale.
At least 10 of the 11 items must be completed for a score to be calculated and the scores range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).
|
Changes from baseline (measured immediately before the application of the first treatment) and at 40 minutes after the application of the last treatment.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Work Status at baseline
Time Frame: Measured immediately before the application of the first treatment
|
This measure is performed through the employed participant (full-time or part-time) answering in a dichotomous manner (yes or no) the question: "Do you currently work?"
|
Measured immediately before the application of the first treatment
|
|
Work Status post treatment
Time Frame: Measured immediatly after the application of the last treatment.
|
This measure is performed through the employed participant (full-time or part-time) answering in a dichotomous manner (yes or no) the question: "Do you currently work?"
|
Measured immediatly after the application of the last treatment.
|
|
Change in Work Task (Job Type)
Time Frame: Measured immediatly after the application of the last treatment.
|
This measure is performed through the employed participant (full-time or part-time) answering in a dichotomous manner (yes or no) the question: "Did you change your job type or task?"
|
Measured immediatly after the application of the last treatment.
|
|
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-17 (TSK-17
Time Frame: Changes from baseline (measured immediately before the application of the first treatment), and at 60 minutes after the application of the last treatment.
|
The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-17 (TSK-17) is a 17-item questionnaire designed to assess the fear of movement and re-injury (kinesiophobia).
Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale (ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree"), yielding a total score that reflects the severity of pain-related fear avoidance beliefs.
It's a widely used and vailidaded clinical and research instrument.
The standard total score range for the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-17) is 17 to 68.
It is calculated by summing 17 items, each scored 1-4, with four items reverse-scored.
Higher scores indicate greater fear of movement.
|
Changes from baseline (measured immediately before the application of the first treatment), and at 60 minutes after the application of the last treatment.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Francisco Unda Solano, PHD
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Ilyas AM, Miller AJ, Graham JG, Matzon JL. A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded Trial Comparing Acetaminophen, Ibuprofen, and Oxycodone for Pain Management After Hand Surgery. Orthopedics. 2019 Mar 1;42(2):110-115. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20190221-02. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
- Choi GH, Wieland LS, Lee H, Sim H, Lee MS, Shin BC. Acupuncture and related interventions for the treatment of symptoms associated with carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 2;12(12):CD011215. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011215.pub2.
- Weinheimer K, Michelotti B, Silver J, Taylor K, Payatakes A. A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded Controlled Trial Comparing Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen Versus Hydrocodone and Acetaminophen for Soft Tissue Hand Procedures. J Hand Surg Am. 2019 May;44(5):387-393. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.10.014. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
- Riasi H, Rajabpour Sanati A, Salehi F, Salehian H, Ghaemi K. Analyzing the therapeutic effects of short wrist splint in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) under ibuprofen treatment from an EMG-NCV perspective. J Med Life. 2015;8(Spec Iss 4):154-158.
- Davis PT, Hulbert JR, Kassak KM, Meyer JJ. Comparative efficacy of conservative medical and chiropractic treatments for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized clinical trail. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998 Jun;21(5):317-26.
- Sanz DR, Solano FU, Lopez DL, Corbalan IS, Morales CR, Lobo CC. Effectiveness of median nerve neural mobilization versus oral ibuprofen treatment in subjects who suffer from cervicobrachial pain: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Med Sci. 2018 Jun;14(4):871-879. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2017.70328. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
- Calvo-Lobo C, Unda-Solano F, Lopez-Lopez D, Sanz-Corbalan I, Romero-Morales C, Palomo-Lopez P, Seco-Calvo J, Rodriguez-Sanz D. Is pharmacologic treatment better than neural mobilization for cervicobrachial pain? A randomized clinical trial. Int J Med Sci. 2018 Mar 8;15(5):456-465. doi: 10.7150/ijms.23525. eCollection 2018.
- Rodriguez-Sanz D, Lopez-Lopez D, Unda-Solano F, Romero-Morales C, Sanz-Corbalan I, Beltran-Alacreu H, Calvo-Lobo C. Effects of Median Nerve Neural Mobilization in Treating Cervicobrachial Pain: A Randomized Waiting List-Controlled Clinical Trial. Pain Pract. 2018 Apr;18(4):431-442. doi: 10.1111/papr.12614. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
- Basson A, Olivier B, Ellis R, Coppieters M, Stewart A, Mudzi W. The Effectiveness of Neural Mobilization for Neuromusculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Sep;47(9):593-615. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7117. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
- Ballestero-Perez R, Plaza-Manzano G, Urraca-Gesto A, Romo-Romo F, Atin-Arratibel MLA, Pecos-Martin D, Gallego-Izquierdo T, Romero-Franco N. Effectiveness of Nerve Gliding Exercises on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017 Jan;40(1):50-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
- Shin D, Lee SJ, Ha YM, Choi YS, Kim JW, Park SR, Park MK. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation according to absorption differences in three formulations of ibuprofen. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017 Jan 4;11:135-141. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S121633. eCollection 2017.
- Eren Y, Yavasoglu NG, Comoglu SS. The relationship between QDASH scale and clinical, electrophysiological findings in carpal tunnel syndrome. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2018 Jan;27(1):71-75. doi: 10.17219/acem/67947.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
April 14, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 20, 2020
Study Completion (Actual)
July 28, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 6, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 6, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
October 8, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
December 10, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 3, 2025
Last Verified
December 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Nervous System Diseases
- Wounds and Injuries
- Neuromuscular Diseases
- Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
- Neurobehavioral Manifestations
- Median Neuropathy
- Mononeuropathies
- Nerve Compression Syndromes
- Cumulative Trauma Disorders
- Sprains and Strains
- Perceptual Disorders
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Signs and Symptoms
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
- Agnosia
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Antirheumatic Agents
- Sensory System Agents
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
- Analgesics
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
- Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors
- ibuprofen arginine
Other Study ID Numbers
- CE0072015-02-02
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
-
Stanford UniversityMayo Clinic; National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases... and other collaboratorsCompletedCarpal Tunnel Syndrome | Carpal Tunnel | Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Bilateral | Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Left | Carpal Tunnel Syndrome RightUnited States
-
Issa, Abdulhamid Sayed, M.D.CompletedCarpal Tunnel Syndrome | CTS | Carpal Tunnel Release | Carpal Tunnel Surgery | Carpal Tunnel Transverse ApproachSyrian Arab Republic
-
Kuopio University HospitalUniversity of Eastern FinlandNot yet recruitingCarpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) | Carpal Tunnel SurgeryFinland
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalRecruitingCarpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) | Carpal Tunnel SurgeryBrazil
-
Maasstad HospitalRecruitingCarpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) | Lacertus SyndromeNetherlands
-
Galala UniversityCompletedCarpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)Egypt
-
Stanford UniversityCompletedCarpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)United States
-
Fundacin Biomedica Galicia SurCompletedCarpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)Spain
-
GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la RechercheCompletedCarpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) | Heel Pain SyndromeFrance
-
Ankara UniversityNot yet recruitingCarpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)Turkey (Türkiye)
Clinical Trials on Median nerve neural mobilization
-
Universidad Europea de MadridCompletedCervicobrachial NeuralgiaVenezuela
-
Universidad Europea de MadridCompleted
-
University of FloridaNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)CompletedCarpal Tunnel SyndromeUnited States
-
Universidad Autonoma de MadridCentro Universitario La SalleCompleted
-
Izmir Katip Celebi UniversitySuspendedLateral EpicondylitisTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Galala UniversityCompletedCarpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)Egypt
-
Bahria UniversityCompleted
-
Shalamar Institute of Health SciencesNot yet recruiting