The Effect of Auditory and Motor Cognitive Distractions on the Neural Provocation Test in Subjects With Neck Pain

September 10, 2020 updated by: Roy La Touche Arbizu, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid

The Effect of Auditory and Motor Cognitive Distractions on the Neural Provocation Test in Subjects With Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The main objective of this research is to evaluate the influence of different distraction stimuli on neural mechano-sensitivity tests.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28023
        • CSEU La Salle

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women aged between 18 and 65 years
  • Medical diagnosis of non specific chronic neck pain with more than 6 months of evolution of neck pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with rheumatic diseases, cervical hernia, cervical whiplash syndrome, neck surgeries o a history of arthrodesis
  • Systemic diseases
  • Vision, hearing or vestibular problems
  • Severe trauma or a traffic accident that had an impact on the cervical area.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Neural Stress Provoked by the Median Nerve
The patient is placed in a supine position and his cervical spine with 25º of lateral flexion on the opposite side of the member in which we perform the test. First a passive scapular depression is performed, 90º of shoulder abduction combining external shoulder rotation. Next, a supination of the forearm is performed with wrist extension and finger extension. Finally, the elbow is extended to the limit of resistance or when the investigator observes the elevation of the shoulder girdle.
EXPERIMENTAL: Neural stress provocation with cognitive auditory distraction
Neural provocation of the median nerve is performed but an auditory distraction is added with a metronome with a constant time of 50 beats per minute.
EXPERIMENTAL: Providing neural stress with a motor distraction
The neural provocation of the median nerve is performed and we add a motor distraction that consists of the patient intermittently squeezing a ball with the opposite hand.
EXPERIMENTAL: Neural stress provocation with both distractions
The neural provocation of the median nerve is performed, we add auditory distraction with the metronome with a constant time of 50 BPM and a motor distraction consisting of squeezing a ball to the rhythm that sounds the metronome.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mechanosensitivity based on range of motion
Time Frame: Change in pressure pain threshold immediately at the end of the intervention
The inclinometer, an instrument characterized by the constant use of gravity as a reference point to evaluate mobility, is used to evaluate the range of nerve movement.
Change in pressure pain threshold immediately at the end of the intervention
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Change in pain intensity immediately at the end of the intervention
It is the subjective feeling of self-reported pain ranging from 0-100 points.
Change in pain intensity immediately at the end of the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • uammadrid30

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on median nerve mobilization

3
Subscribe