Radio Frequency (Forma Eye) Treatment for Dry Eye Disease Due to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

September 26, 2025 updated by: InMode MD Ltd.

Clinical Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Radio Frequency (Forma Eye) Treatment for Dry Eye Disease Due to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency treatment for dry eye disease due to meibomian gland dysfunction

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

47

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80016
        • Centennial Eye Associates
    • New Hampshire
      • Portsmouth, New Hampshire, United States, 03801
        • Excellent Vision
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78745
        • Sean Paul

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult females and males between the ages of 18 -75, seeking treatments for Dry Eye Disease Due to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
  2. Tear breakup time (TBUT) ≤10 s;
  3. Evidence of meibomian gland (MG) obstruction, based on total MGS of ≤12 in lower eyelids for each eye as assessed by a clinician not involved in the study procedure
  4. Subjective symptom score (using the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness [SPEED] questionnaire) ≥10;
  5. At least one meibomian gland opening with a visible plugging over the eyelid margin
  6. No ocular pathology requiring treatment other than eye lubricant and conventional eyelid hygiene within the last month and during the study
  7. The subjects should understand the information provided about the investigative nature of the treatment, possible benefits, and side effects, and sign the Informed Consent Form
  8. The subjects should be willing to comply with the study procedure and schedule, including follow up visits.
  9. Agreement/ability to abstain from dry eye/MGD medications or any device treatments for the time between the treatment visit and the final study visit. Ocular lubricants are allowed if no changes are made during the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Evidence of co-existing ocular conditions potentially posing an increased risk of procedure-related injury, (e.g., active ocular infection or inflammation in either eye)
  2. History of ocular trauma or surgery including intraocular, oculoplastic, corneal or refractive surgery within 1 year
  3. Ocular surface abnormality potentially compromising corneal integrity in either eye; eyelid abnormalities affecting lid function in either eye
  4. Systemic disease conditions that cause dry eye (e.g., Stevens-Johnson syndrome, vitamin A deficiency, rheumatoid arthritis, Wegener's granulomatosis, sarcoidosis, leukemia, Riley-Day syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjogren's syndrome)
  5. Unwillingness to abstain from systemic medications known to cause dryness for the study duration.
  6. Individuals who have either changed the dosing of systemic or non-dry eye/MGD ophthalmic medication within the past 30 days prior to screening
  7. Internal defibrillator, a pacemaker or any other implanted electrical device anywhere in the body
  8. Permanent metal implant in the treatment area
  9. Any surgery in the treatment area in the last 3 months
  10. Current or history of skin cancer, or current condition of any other type of cancer, or pre-malignant moles
  11. Pregnancy and nursing or females of childbearing potential and not utilizing adequate birth control measures
  12. Impaired immune system due to immunosuppressive diseases such as AIDS and HIV, or use of immunosuppressive medications
  13. Patients with a history of diseases stimulated by heat, such as recurrent Herpes Simplex in the treatment area, may be treated only following a prophylactic regimen.
  14. Poorly controlled endocrine disorders, such as diabetes, thyroid dysfunction, polycystic ovary, and hormonal virilization
  15. Any active condition in the treatment area, such as but not limited to open sores, psoriasis, eczema, vitiligo, herpes, and rash.
  16. History of skin disorders, keloids, abnormal wound healing, as well as very dry and fragile skin
  17. Severe concurrent conditions, such as cardiac disorders, sensory disturbances.
  18. Use of Isotretinoin (Accutane®) within 6 months prior to treatment.
  19. Participation in another study within 30 days prior to screening.

    -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Forma Eye treatment

Eligible subjects will receive up to 3 treatments (2-3 weeks interval) with the Forma Eye Applicator according to the study protocol.

The subject will return for 3 follow up visits: four weeks (4wk FU), 12 weeks (12wk FU), twenty-four weeks (24wk FU) after the last treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Standardized Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED)
Time Frame: 6 months
Change dry eye symptoms evaluated by Standardized Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) This questionnaire gives a score from 0 to 28. Lower score indicates better outcome. 0-4: mild, 5-7: moderate, 8+: severe Scale range: 0 (minimum; no symptoms) to 28 (maximum; most severe symptoms). Interpretation: Lower scores indicate better outcomes. Symptom severity can be categorized as: 0-4 = mild, 5-7 = moderate, 8-28 = severe.
6 months
Meibomian Gland Score (MGS), as Assessed by a Masked Rater
Time Frame: 6 months

The Meibomian Gland Score (MGS) is a standardized clinical tool used to assess the functional quality of the meibomian glands, which are responsible for secreting the oily layer of the tear film. Dysfunction in these glands is a common cause of dry eye disease and evaporative dry eye. The scoring typically involves gentle expression of the meibomian glands, usually from a designated number of glands (commonly 15, e.g., 5 each from the nasal, central, and temporal parts of the lower eyelid). Each gland is evaluated based on the quality of the secretion it produces.

Scoring Criteria per Gland:

Each gland is scored on a 0-3 scale:

0 = No secretion

  1. = Inspissated/toothpaste-like secretion
  2. = Cloudy secretion
  3. = Clear, healthy oil

If 15 glands are assessed, the maximum total score is 45 (15 glands × 3 points per gland).

A higher total MGS reflects better meibomian gland function and healthier tear film, indicating a more favorable condition.

6 months
Tear Break-Up Time
Time Frame: 6 months

Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) Changes in dry eye symptoms such as ocular fatigue or dryness will be assessed by TBUT. The measurement is reported in seconds.

  • Scale range: 0 seconds (minimum) to >10 seconds (maximum normal value considered).
  • Interpretation: >10 seconds = normal, 5-10 seconds = marginal, <5 seconds = low.
6 months
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)
Time Frame: 6 months
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) This 12-item questionnaire assesses dry eye symptoms and their effects. Scale range: 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). Interpretation: Lower scores indicate better outcomes.
6 months
Corneal Surface Fluorescent Staining Using NEI (National Eye Institute) Grading
Time Frame: 6 months

Change in measurements using ocular surface fluorescent staining. The NEI scale divides the corneal and conjunctival surfaces to grade fluorescein uptake. Each of 5 areas per cornea is graded 0-3. The NEI scale for grading fluorescein staining divides the corneal and conjunctival surfaces to help measure fluorescein uptake. A standardized grading system of 0 to 3 is used for each of the five areas on each cornea.

Scale range: 0 (minimum; no staining) to 15 (maximum). Interpretation: Lower scores indicate better outcomes.

6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subject's Assessment of Improvement
Time Frame: 6 months

Subject assessment of improvement based on 0 - 4-point Likert scale. Improvement assessment will be performed independently by the subject himself on the following 0-4 points Likert scale questionnaire (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale):

4 = Significantly marked improvement; 3 = Marked improvement; 2 = Moderate improvement; 1 = Slight improvement; 0 = No difference Scale range: 0 (no difference) to 4 (significant marked improvement).

6 months
Subject Assessment of Satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 months

Subject assessment of satisfaction will be filled-out by subjects only using 5-points Likert scale:

+2 = Very satisfied; +1 = Satisfied; 0 = Indifferent; -1 = Disappointed; -2 = Very disappointed.

Scale range: -2 (very disappointed) to +2 (very satisfied). Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better outcomes.

6 months
Safety Assessment
Time Frame: 6 weeks

Discomfort assessment during the treatment using NSR scale. At each treatment the subject will be asked to fill assessments for the pain/discomfort during the procedure. The subject will be asked to rate the severity from 0 to 10, with 0 equaling no symptoms and 10 equaling the worst possible symptoms. A number is obtained by measuring up to the point the subject has indicated.

Scale range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).

6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sean Paul, MD, 4316 James Casey St Building F Suite 201, Austin, TX 78745, United States
  • Principal Investigator: Sandy Zhang-Nunes, MD, Oculofacial Plastic Surgery Director USC Roski Eye Institue USC Keck School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 22, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 25, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 25, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 9, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Improvement of Dry Eye Disease

Clinical Trials on Forma Eye Applicator

Subscribe