Comparing Cognitive Remediation Approaches for Schizophrenia

August 11, 2020 updated by: Matthew M. Kurtz, Wesleyan University
This research compares the relative efficacy of two empirically-supported, standardized programs of cognitive remediation for treatment of cognitive deficits and community function in schizophrenia to help inform best practices. The proposed study advances public health by developing and evaluating new behavioral techniques for improving psychosocial outcome in individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Evidence over the past 30 years has revealed that 70-80% of individuals with schizophrenia exhibit marked neurocognitive deficits on measures of attention, learning and memory, problem-solving, language and sensory-motor skill. Particular significance has been attached to these deficits as their severity has been linked to impaired community function, social problem-solving and progress in psychosocial rehabilitation programs. Cognitive remediation (CR) is a type of behavioral intervention that addresses cognitive deficits in schizophrenia by restoring lost cognitive skills or providing strategies for bypassing deficits through task practice. Meta-analyses have revealed that cognitive remediation is a validated approach to improving cognitive function in schizophrenia, however a lack of precision regarding the active elements of the intervention have prevented its recommendation as a standard treatment for the illness. The present three-year proposal seeks to identify cognitive training mechanisms that are most effective at improving cognitive function in schizophrenia by comparing two different systematic programs of CR with different foci: drill-and-practice exercises vs. compensatory strategies. Both programs have strong preliminary empirical support. One-hundred and thirty-five clients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: a neuroplasticity-based, drill-and-practice program of computer-assisted cognitive training exercises designed to restore lost cognitive capacity; a manualized strategy training method for bypassing deficits in cognition, or a computer games control condition. Study measures, organized according to an experimental therapeutics approach, with targets distinguished from outcomes, will assess generalization of any observed training effects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

135

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • Hartford, Connecticut, United States, 06102
        • Institute of Living
      • Middletown, Connecticut, United States, 06457
        • River Valley Services

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Meeting DSM-5 criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, presenting for intensive outpatient clinical care.
  2. Stabilized on atypical antipsychotic medication for a minimum of 2 months prior to entry into the protocol.
  3. A minimum of 2 months since discharge from last hospitalization.

    -

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Uncorrected auditory or visual impairment.
  2. Mental retardation (Full Scale IQ<70, as estimated by single word-reading from the WRAT and/or evidence of a history of services).
  3. Traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness for more than 10 minutes.
  4. Presence or history of any neurologic illness.
  5. Lack of proficiency in English
  6. Criteria met for concurrent substance dependence,
  7. Scoring within 1SD of healthy control performance (from published norms) on measures of visual vigilance, verbal learning, and working memory.

    -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Restorative CR Intervention
The restorative remediation intervention will consist of a target of 50 hours (5 hours per week, 1 hour per day, over 3 months) of a sequence of computerized cognitive exercises designed to improve cognitive function through repeated drill-and-practice of exercises largely focused on attention, working memory and verbal episodic memory. Cognitive deficits will be directly targeted by these exercises. Exercises will be started at individually determined levels of difficulty at which each client will be successful, e.g., 80% accuracy. Task difficulty will be increased as performance improves.
Cognitive remediation (CR) is a behavioral treatment designed to address neurocognitive deficits through task practice and/or strategy acquisition.
EXPERIMENTAL: Strategy CR Intervention
Participants in this intervention will be treated for 24 hours (2 hours per week, one day per week over 3 months) with Compensatory Cognitive Training (CCT). The therapy targets four cognitive domains: (a) prospective memory, (b) attention and vigilance, (c) learning and memory, and (d) executive function. The program is a group-based intervention that teaches strategies via interactive, game-like activities to maintain interest and enhance motivation and engagement.
Cognitive remediation (CR) is a behavioral treatment designed to address neurocognitive deficits through task practice and/or strategy acquisition.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Computer Games
Three months of 1-hour, 5-times per week, client-selected computer games.
Sham placebo treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Matrics Consensus Cognitive Battery score (MCCB composite score)
Time Frame: Measures change from study entry, after 3-months of treatment and at a 3-month follow-up.
The MCCB includes state-of-the-art cognitive probes selected by 74 experts using the RAND panel method. The battery has strong reliability in schizophrenia and includes multiple forms for many subtests to help control for practice effects. Summary T-scores range from 20 to 80 with higher scores indicating better cognitive performance.
Measures change from study entry, after 3-months of treatment and at a 3-month follow-up.
UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment
Time Frame: Measures change from study entry, after 3-months of treatment and at a 3-month follow-up.
This standardized performance-based instrument of everyday function, with evidence of reliability and validity in schizophrenia samples, provides information regarding patients' ability to manage information/planning, finance, communications, mobility and household management in role-play situations.Scores range from 0-20 with higher scores indicating better functioning.
Measures change from study entry, after 3-months of treatment and at a 3-month follow-up.
Quality of Life Scale
Time Frame: Measures change from study entry, after 3-months of treatment and at a 3-month follow-up.
A 21-item scale commonly used as a measure of psychosocial functioning in schizophrenia. The Quality-of-Life Scale balances subjective questions regarding life satisfaction and objective indicators of social and occupational role functioning.Scores range from 0-42 with higher scores indicating better functioning.
Measures change from study entry, after 3-months of treatment and at a 3-month follow-up.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 10, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1R15MH117676-01A1 (NIH)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Remediation

Subscribe