Mepolizumab in Episodic Angioedema With Eosinophilia

Pilot Study of Mepolizumab in Episodic Angioedema With Eosinophilia

Background:

Gleich syndrome is also called episodic angioedema with eosinophilia (EAE). People with EAE have episodes of swelling. They may also have itching, hives, fever, and weight gain. During episodes, the body has very high numbers of white blood cells, especially a kind called eosinophils. Researchers think a drug called mepolizumab could help.

Objective:

To see if mepolizumab causes EAE symptoms to be less severe and happen less often.

Eligibility:

People ages 18 or older with EAE.

Design:

Participants will be screened under NIH protocol 94-I-0079.

Participants will have 8 visits over about 6 months. The timing of some visits will depend on each participant s EAE episodes. Visits will include:

  • Medical history
  • Physical exam
  • Blood and urine tests
  • Optional bone marrow collection at first or second visit. For this, a needle will be inserted through the participant s hip bone into the marrow.

Participants will get mepolizumab 3 times over about 3 months. They will get their first dose when their eosinophils are at their lowest point. They will get the drug by IV. A needle will guide a thin plastic tube into an arm vein. The drug will be given through the tube over about 30 minutes.

Participants will keep a daily online log for about 3 months. The log will track their weight, temperature, and EAE symptoms. During the whole study, they will complete 2 online questionnaires about their symptoms. They will fill out 1 daily and 1 monthly.

Participants will have blood and urine tests 2-3 times a week. For these, they will go to their local doctor.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Episodic angioedema with eosinophilia (EAE), also known as Gleich s Syndrome,is a rare disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of urticaria, fever, angioedema, weight gain and dramatic eosinophilia that occur at 3- to 6-week intervals and resolve with spontaneous diuresis in the absence of therapy. Although the syndrome is often classified in the broad category of idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), EAE is a distinct eosinophilic syndrome that is remarkably homogeneous in clinical presentation. More recently, it has become apparent that there is multilineage cycling, involving lymphocytes and neutrophils in addition to eosinophils. Early studies described cyclic elevations of serum interleukin 5 (IL-5) preceding the rise in eosinophilia, and additional studies have shown cyclic elevations in other type II cytokines as well as in eosinophilic chemokines. Aberrant T cells with a CD3-CD4+ surface phenotype have also been detected in the majority of subjects with EAE. The cyclic nature of the disorder and the involvement of multiple cell lineages have made it difficult to determine the underlying cause of EAE.

We hypothesize that IL-5 driven eosinophilia is central to the pathogenesis of EAE. Suppression of eosinophil cycling by blocking IL-5 would help determine whether eosinophils are indeed the main drivers of the symptoms of angioedema and urticaria and pave the way for future mechanistic studies investigating the etiology of this unusual disorder. The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate the effect of mepolizumab, a humanized antibody to IL-5, on eosinophil cycling in 12 subjects with EAE. Subjects with EAE will undergo screening on the National Institutes of Health protocol 94-I-0079 to establish the periodicity of their cycling (if not previously determined) and the optimal timing for the baseline visit. After screening, subjects will be followed closely with signs and symptoms recorded in a daily log and daily and monthly questionnaires, as well as complete blood counts and research blood collected for one cycle prior to administration of mepolizumab. Subjects will receive a total of 3 monthly administrations of mepolizumab at 700 mg, followed by drug de-escalation over 6 additional monthly administrations for subjects who demonstrate benefit from mepolizumab. All subjects will have a follow-up visit about 1 month after the last study administration of mepolizumab.

The primary efficacy endpoint will be reduction of symptoms and severity of symptoms after mepolizumab. Secondary endpoints will include reduction in peak eosinophils after mepolizumab, continued suppression of absolute eosinophil count and reduction in symptoms following monthly dosing of mepolizumab therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20892
        • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

  • INCLUSION CRITERIA:

A subject will be eligible for participation in the study only if all of the following criteria apply:

  1. The subject is male or female, aged 18 years or older.
  2. The subject has a documented diagnosis of EAE.
  3. The subject has symptoms of EAE in the cycle prior to screening, including but not limited to fever, swelling, hives or rashes, weight gain, muscle pain, and lymphadenopathy.
  4. Cycling of eosinophils is ongoing as indicated by a peak absolute eosinophil count (AEC) greater than or equal to 1500/mm^3 during at least one cycle in the prior 3 months.
  5. If taking corticosteroids, the subject is able and willing to stay on a stable dose for 6 weeks prior to screening.
  6. The subject agrees to storage of study samples.
  7. The subject is able to provide informed consent.
  8. Females are eligible for this study if they are:

    • of non-childbearing potential (i.e., women who have had a hysterectomy or tubal ligation or are postmenopausal as defined by no menses in 1 year); OR
    • of childbearing potential but willing to practice effective contraception or abstinence during administration of the study drug and for 100 days (5 terminal half-lives) after administration of the study drug.
    • Not breastfeeding.

Participation of Women:

Pregnancy: The effects of mepolizumab on the developing human fetus are unknown. For this reason, women of childbearing potential must agree to use adequate contraception (see below for acceptable methods) prior to study entry, for the duration of study participation, and for >5 terminal half-lives (approximately 100 days) after administration of the last dose of study drug. Nonreproductive potential is defined as post-menopausal, male partner who has azoospermia or is surgically sterile (at least 6 weeks before screening) and is the sole sexual partner, surgical sterility, or a congenital or acquired condition that definitely prevents conception. Further, postmenopausal is defined as at least 12 consecutive months with no menses at age 50 or older, or a high follicle-stimulating hormone level in the postmenopausal range at ages 45-50 years in subjects not using hormonal contraception or hormone replacement therapy.

Females with reproductive potential must either practice complete and uninterrupted abstinence from heterosexual activity or use 2 of the following methods of contraception with their partners. The 2 methods must include either 2 barrier methods, or 1 barrier method and 1 non-barrier method, both of which must be consistently used:

Barrier Methods:

  1. Diaphragm with spermicide
  2. Cervical cap with spermicide or contraceptive sponge (for nulliparous subjects only)
  3. Male or female condom (cannot be used together)

Non-Barrier Methods

  1. An intrauterine device with a documented failure rate of <1%
  2. Hormonal contraception: pill (estrogen/progestin or progestin-only), patch, vaginal ring, rod implanted in the skin, or subcutaneous injection methods

Females of childbearing-potential must have a negative pregnancy test result prior to receiving mepolizumab at each on-site study visit. During the course of the study, if a woman becomes pregnant or suspects she is pregnant, she should inform the study staff and her primary care physician immediately. A pregnancy registry has been created for subjects who become pregnant while receiving the approved dose of mepolizumab (100 mg subcutaneous injection) for asthma.

Fertility: There is no fertility data in humans. Animal studies showed no adverse effects of anti-IL-5 treatment on fertility.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

A subject will not be eligible to participate in the study if any of the following conditions are fulfilled at the time of screening:

  1. Treatment with immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agents including but not limited to cyclosporine, interferon-alpha, azathioprine, methotrexate, and cyclophosphamide within the past 3 months.
  2. Treatment with biologics including but not limited to mepolizumab, IVIG, anti-TNF agents, rituximab, benralizumab, alemtuzumab, reslizumab, dupilumab, lebrikizumab, and omalizumab within 6 months or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer). Subjects who received rituximab at any time in the past must have normal B-cell numbers to participate.
  3. Co-morbid illness, alcohol or substance abuse, or any other condition (e.g., HIV, active hepatitis) that, in the opinion of the investigator, places the subject at undue risk by participating in the study.
  4. Treatment with a daily dose of corticosteroids >40 mg.

Co-enrollment Guidelines: Co-enrollment in other trials is restricted, other than enrollment on observational studies or those evaluating the use of a licensed medication. Study staff should be notified of co-enrollment as it may require the approval of the investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active treatment
Participants with episodic angioedema with eosinophilia (EAE) received mepolizumab 700 mg intravenously monthly for three doses.
Mepolizumab is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG1, kappa mAb) supplied as 100 mg of lyophilized powder in sterile, single-dose vials. Mepolizumab 100 mg vials were reconstituted according to the manufacturer, for a total dose of 700mg administered as intravenous infusion.
Other Names:
  • Nucala

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change in Maximum Daily Angioedema Activity Score (AAS)
Time Frame: 1 month prior to treatment and 3 months after treatment
We measure the number and severity of clinical symptoms associated with episodic angioedema with eosinophilia (EAE) using the maximum of the patient reported daily angioedema activity score, a validated patient reported outcome measure. The daily score was used to measure changes in swelling within a cycle. Participants answered 5 questions each day that were scored from 0-3 for each item. The daily score consisted of a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 15, the sum of the 5 question answers. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. The change of the daily angioedema activity score is measured as the average percent reduction in the maximum score over the 3 cycles (about 3 months) after treatment compared to the cycle (about 1 month) pre-treatment. The estimated percent change and its confidence interval was calculated from a quasi-Poisson model. The model estimates a multiplicative treatment effect on the baseline AAS, and that effect is translated into a percent change.
1 month prior to treatment and 3 months after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change in Peak Absolute Eosinophil Count (AEC)
Time Frame: 1 month prior to treatment and 1 month after treatment
Percent change in peak AEC is measured on each individual as the percentage change in peak AEC in the cycle following the first mepolizumab infusion compared to the peak AEC in the cycle prior to mepolizumab treatment. Those values are summarized by taking the mean of a transformation of each percent change in peak AEC, and back-transforming the results. Specifically, if x is the percent change in peak AEC, then the transformation is log(1-x/100). The estimated percent change and its confidence interval was calculated using the mean of the transformed values and using the associated one-sample t-test confidence interval on that mean, then translating those estimates and confidence intervals back to the percent change scale.
1 month prior to treatment and 1 month after treatment
Percent Change in Peak Absolute Eosinophil Count (AEC)
Time Frame: 1 month prior to treatment and 3 months after treatment
Percent change in peak AEC is measured on each individual as the percentage change in peak AEC by visit 8 (3 months) compared to the peak AEC in the cycle prior to mepolizumab treatment. Those values are summarized by taking the mean of a transformation of each percent change in peak AEC, and back-transforming the results. Specifically, if x is the percent change in peak AEC, then the transformation is log(1-x/100). The estimated percent change and its confidence interval was calculated using the mean of the transformed values and using the associated one-sample t-test confidence interval on that mean, then translating those estimates and confidence intervals back to the percent change scale.
1 month prior to treatment and 3 months after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paneez Khoury, M.D., National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 14, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Eosinophilia

Clinical Trials on mepolizumab

3
Subscribe