Intense Pulsed Light in Meibomian Gland Dysfunctions (LACRYSTIM)

Intense Pulsed Light in Meibomian Gland Dysfunctions: Retrospective Study

Dry eye disease (DED) is an extremely common disease whose meibomian gland dysfunction is the main etiology.

Polychromatic intense pulsed light (IPL) is a promising new therapeutic alternative but few clinical data have been published.

A new IPL device has recently been marketed: LACRYSTIM (QUANTEL, France). The investigators have been using it in our clinical practice since June 2019.

The investigators present a retrospective study on our first clinical results.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Saint Etienne, France, 42055
        • CHU de Saint Etienne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with Dry eye disease with meibomian gland dysfunction, preferentially mild to moderate, and having benefited from intense pulsed light treatment

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with Dry eye disease with meibomian gland dysfunction, preferentially mild to moderate, and having benefited from intense pulsed light treatment.
  • patient affiliated with a social security organization

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient with incomplete follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients with dry eye disease with meibomian gland dysfunction

Collected data from patient records for consultations Day 0, Day 15 and Day 45 (3 treatment sessions) and Months 3, Months 6 (follow-up consultations).

- parameters used for each treatment session: duration of treatment session and intensity of intense pulsed light

collection data : parameters used for each treatment session: duration of treatment session and intensity of intense pulsed light

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lacrydiag in current clinical practice
Time Frame: 6 months
The LacryDiag ocular surface analyzer is used for the diagnosis of dry eyes.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
collection of adverse events
Time Frame: 6 months
-data concerning the safety: presence or absence of adverse events during treatment or afterwards (burns, tingling, redness of skin ...)
6 months
Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months
measured in current clinical practice. This 12-item questionnaire assesses dry eye symptoms and the effects it has on vision-related function in the past week of the patient's life. The questionnaire has 3 subscales: ocular symptoms, vision-related function, and environmental triggers.
6 months
Slit lamp Photography x16 and x25
Time Frame: 6 months
in current clinical practice
6 months
Oxford Score
Time Frame: 6 months
measured in current clinical practice. The Oxford score is used to assess epithelial damage to the cornea and conjunctiva.
6 months
Break-up time Test
Time Frame: 6 months
measured in current clinical practice. The measurement of the tear film rupture time determines the stability of the tear film, i.e. the degree of humidification of the eyes.
6 months
Schirmer Test
Time Frame: 6 months
measured in current clinical practice. Determination of the quantity of tears produced.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marie Caroline TRONE, MD, CHU de Saint Etienne

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 25, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRBN672019/CHUSTE

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Eye Syndromes

Clinical Trials on intense pulsed light (usual practice)

Subscribe