- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04155268
Flotation-REST for Chronic Pain, Stress, and Sleep
September 8, 2020 updated by: Steven Pratscher, University of Missouri-Columbia
Daily Assessments of Pain, Stress, and Sleep Following Flotation-REST: A Randomized Crossover Trial for Those With Chronic Pain
This randomized crossover trial aims to examine the effects of Flotation-REST (Reduced, Environmental, Stimulation, Technique/Therapy) compared to laying in a dark room (with reduced environmental stimulation) for those with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
This design will allow for comparisons between the two interventions on daily diary assessments of pain, stress, and sleep, both between groups and within individuals.
Study Overview
Status
Withdrawn
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Chronic pain is a prevalent and significant health problem.
Previous research shows that Flotation-REST may be an effective treatment for reducing pain but little is known about the short-term effects of a single session of Flotation-REST on the day-to-day variability of pain, stress, and sleep.
Sleep, stress, and pain are all bidirectionally related to each other, and previous research shows that Flotation-REST may positively influence all three of these outcomes.
Therefore, the primary aim of this study is to examine changes in pain, stress, and sleep following Flotation-REST.
The secondary aim is to investigate whether various subjective experiences during the intervention are associated with changes in pain, stress, and sleep following the interventions.
Study Type
Interventional
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
16 years to 73 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Chronic musculoskeletal pain (e.g., back pain or upper or lower extremity pain, arthritis, fibromyalgia) on more days than not for the past 3 months
- Psychologically healthy
- Adults between the ages of 18-75 years.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous experience in a flotation-REST device.
- Diagnosed with neuropathic pain condition or endorsing more than 4 peripheral neuropathy symptoms.
- Diagnosed with any psychiatric condition (e.g., schizophrenia or bipolar disorder).
- Active suicidality with intent or plan.
- Currently taking SSRI medication.
- History of neurological conditions (e.g., epilepsy, stroke, severe traumatic brain injury, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease or other forms of dementia)
- Any skin conditions or open wounds that could cause pain when exposed to saltwater
- Inability to lay comfortably for 60 minutes
- Pregnant
- Started a new sleep or pain medication within the last 6 weeks
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Floatation-REST
Participants will float in a shallow pool of water with about 1000 pounds of epsom salt, in a light and sound attenuated device, for up to 60 minutes.
Following the session, participants' ratings of the experience will be measured.
|
Floating in a specialized device (float pod or float cabin) used to attenuate sensory input.
|
Active Comparator: Dark Room
Participants will lay on an air mattress in a dark and quiet room, with reduced environmental stimulation, for up to 60 minutes.
Following the session, participants' ratings of the experience will be measured.
|
Participants will lay on an air mattress in a dark room with no cell phone and reduced sensory input.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pain intensity
Time Frame: From baseline to follow-up, approximately 2 weeks
|
Change in daily pain intensity where higher scores represent greater pain reduction using the Brief Pain Inventory
|
From baseline to follow-up, approximately 2 weeks
|
Pain Unpleasantness
Time Frame: From baseline to follow-up, approximately 2 weeks
|
Change in daily pain unpleasantness where higher scores represent greater pain unpleasantness using the Brief Pain Inventory.
|
From baseline to follow-up, approximately 2 weeks
|
Stress
Time Frame: From baseline to follow-up, approximately 2 weeks
|
Changes in perceived stress scale and daily diary assessments of stress where higher scores represent higher levels of stress.
|
From baseline to follow-up, approximately 2 weeks
|
Sleep
Time Frame: From baseline to follow-up, approximately 2 weeks
|
Sleep Health Index and daily electronic dairies will be used to record sleep parameters.
Higher sleep quality represents better sleep.
|
From baseline to follow-up, approximately 2 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in pain interference
Time Frame: From baseline to follow-up, approximately 2 weeks
|
Change in daily pain interference where higher scores represent interference in daily activities from pain using the Brief Pain Inventory.
|
From baseline to follow-up, approximately 2 weeks
|
Change in muscle tension or tightness
Time Frame: Immediately before and after each intervention
|
Average change in muscle tension from pre- to post-intervention where higher scores indicate greater muscle tension.
|
Immediately before and after each intervention
|
Change in self-actualization from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, 1- week and 1-month after intervention
|
Self-actualization Scale; 5-point Likert-type scale where the highest score indicates strongest self-actualization
|
Baseline, 1- week and 1-month after intervention
|
Interoception
Time Frame: Immediately after each intervention
|
Self-reported interoception assessed with the Multidimensional Interoceptive Awareness Scale after each intervention where higher scores indicate greater interoception during the session.
|
Immediately after each intervention
|
Insight
Time Frame: Immediately after each intervention
|
Self-reported insights assessed with the Psychological Insight Questionnaire after each intervention where higher scores indicate more insight occurred during the session.
|
Immediately after each intervention
|
Emotional Breakthrough
Time Frame: Immediately after each intervention
|
Self-reported emotional breakthrough assessed with the Emotional Breakthrough Inventory after each intervention where higher scores indicate more emotional breakthrough occurred during the session.
|
Immediately after each intervention
|
Mystical Experiences
Time Frame: Immediately after each intervention
|
Self-reported mystical experiencesassessed with the Mystical Experiences Questionnaire after each intervention where higher scores indicate more mystical-type experiences occurred during the session.
|
Immediately after each intervention
|
Change in perceived stress
Time Frame: Baseline and 1-week after each intervention
|
Perceived Stress Scale; assesses changes in perceived stress where higher scores indicate greater levels of stress
|
Baseline and 1-week after each intervention
|
Change in Pain Catastrophizing
Time Frame: Baseline and 1-week after each intervention
|
Pain Catastrophizing Scale; assesses changes in pain catastrophizing where higher scores indicate greater levels of pain catastrophizing
|
Baseline and 1-week after each intervention
|
Change in Depression
Time Frame: Baseline and 1-week after each intervention
|
Becks Depressive Inventory II; assesses changes in depression where higher scores indicate greater levels of depression
|
Baseline and 1-week after each intervention
|
Persisting Effects
Time Frame: 1-week after each intervention
|
Persisting Effects Questionnaire: scale of 0 - 5 where 5 is the strongest persisting effect
|
1-week after each intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Steven Pratscher, University of Missouri-Columbia
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
March 9, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 8, 2020
Study Completion (Actual)
September 8, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 18, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 4, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
November 7, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 10, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 8, 2020
Last Verified
September 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2017263
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Undecided
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Healthy
-
Prevent Age Resort "Pervaya Liniya"RecruitingHealthy Aging | Healthy Diet | Healthy LifestyleRussian Federation
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterCompletedHealthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy AdultsNetherlands
-
Yale UniversityNot yet recruitingHealth-related Benefits of Introducing Table Olives Into the Diet of Young Adults: Olives For HealthHealthy Diet | Healthy Lifestyle | Healthy Nutrition | CholesterolUnited States
-
Hasselt UniversityRecruitingHealthy | Healthy AgingBelgium
-
Galera Therapeutics, Inc.Syneos HealthCompleted
-
Galera Therapeutics, Inc.Syneos HealthCompletedHealthy | Healthy VolunteersAustralia
-
University of PennsylvaniaActive, not recruitingHealthy | Healthy AgingUnited States
-
Chalmers University of TechnologyGöteborg UniversityCompletedHealthy | Nutrition, HealthySweden
-
University of ManitobaNot yet recruitingHealthy | Healthy Diet
Clinical Trials on Flotation-REST
-
West Virginia UniversityEnrolling by invitation
-
West Virginia UniversityCompletedSleep QualityUnited States
-
University of VirginiaUniversity of Colorado, DenverRecruiting
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedMusculoskeletal PainPakistan
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandLaboratoire des Adaptations Métaboliques à l'Exercice en conditions Physiologiques...CompletedAnorexia Nervosa | Constitutional LeannessFrance
-
AMCGNot yet recruitingCoronary Artery DiseaseKorea, Republic of
-
Colorado State UniversityCompletedChronic InsomniaUnited States
-
National Taiwan Normal UniversityCompletedEating Behavior | Food RewardTaiwan
-
Rambam Health Care CampusCompletedVocal Cord Dysfunction | Vocal Fold PolypIsrael
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedCancerUnited States