Piloting Pathways With Lung Cancer Patients

October 3, 2023 updated by: Laurie McLouth

Piloting Pathways, a Hope-enhancing Intervention to Address Activity and Role Function in Metastatic Lung Cancer Patients

The purpose of this research is to determine the feasibility of a new supportive intervention, called Pathways, for patients with advanced stage and metastatic lung cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In this study, investigators will first test the Pathways procedures with 6 patients to identify any improvements that need to be made. Then, investigators will test the feasibility of the Pathways intervention with 20 patients who are undergoing cancer treatment for advanced stage or metastatic lung cancer. Pathways is designed to help patients set and pursue personal goals during lung cancer treatment. In this study, investigators want to see if they can recruit patients with lung cancer who are being treated at the University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center to participate in the Pathways intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

53

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40506
        • University Of Kentucky

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • new or recurrent stage IIIB, stage IIIC or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or extensive stage SCLC
  • 18 years of age or older
  • ECOG PS 0-2/Karnofsky 60-100
  • 3 to 12 weeks into active cancer treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unstable brain metastases
  • cognitive or psychiatric condition for which participating would be inappropriate
  • unable to speak and read English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pathways
Pathways is designed to help patients identify and pursue values-based goals and address potential goal obstacles, including lung cancer stigma.
Goal-setting intervention to help patients identify personal values, value-consistent goals, and ways to pursue goals and address goal obstacles. Although potential refinements may occur based on aim 1 (refining procedures and content with 6 patients), Pathways is designed to consist primarily of 2 in-person sessions (~30-60 minutes) delivered when patients are in clinic for cancer treatment, with supporting phone calls and contact in between sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of Enrollment: Percentage of Eligible and Approached Patients Who Agree to Participate
Time Frame: 9 months
Percentage of eligible and approached patients who agree to participate
9 months
Acceptability: Ratings
Time Frame: 9 months
Mean acceptability ratings on individual items of acceptability developed by study team (e.g., convenience of the intervention, helpfulness of the intervention, relevance of the intervention; scores of at least 7/10 on each item, possible range = 1-10, higher scores indicate higher acceptability).
9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PROMIS Satisfaction With Participation in Social Roles - Short Form 8a
Time Frame: 9 months
Brief measure of satisfaction with ability and participation in activities and roles (e.g., work at home, regular personal and household responsibilities, do things for family) Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with participation. Raw scores range from 8 to 40. 8 items are responded to on a scale of 1 = not at all to 5 = very much.
9 months
Hope - State Hope Scale (Snyder)
Time Frame: 9 months
Brief measure of agency and pathways thinking. 6 items responded to on a scale of 1 = definitely false to 8 = definitely true. Items are summed for a total score (possible range = 6 - 48). Higher scores indicate higher hope.
9 months
Purpose - PROMIS Meaning and Purpose 4a
Time Frame: 9 months
Brief measure assessing one's sense of purpose and that there are reasons for living; 4 items responded to on a scale of 1 = not at all to 5 = very much (possible raw score range = 4 - 20). Higher scores indicate greater meaning and purpose.
9 months
Distress - PROMIS Depression Short Form 6a
Time Frame: 9 months
Brief measure assessing sense of worthlessness, helplessness, depression, etc. 6 items are responded to on a scale of 1 = never to 5 = always (possible raw scores range from 6-30). Higher scores indicate greater distress.
9 months
Lung Cancer Stigma - Lung Cancer Stigma Inventory (Hamann)
Time Frame: 9 months
measure of lung cancer stigma. 25 items making up three subscales (perceived stigma, internalized stigma, and constrained disclosure). Items are responded to on a scale of 1 = not at all to 5 = extremely. Items are summed, with a higher score indicating greater lung cancer stigma/worse outcome (possible total score range = 25-125) . Clinical cutoff of a total score of 37.5 is suggested in literature as significant levels of stigma.
9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laurie McLouth, PhD, University Of Kentucky

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 13, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 3, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

August 3, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 52168
  • R03CA235171-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Pathways

Subscribe