Process Model of Emotion Regulation Integrated Musical Rhythm Interventions' Effects on Student Nurses' Anger

November 20, 2019 updated by: Gizem Beycan Ekitli, PhD., Ege University

The Effect of Gross' Process Model of Emotion Regulation Integrated in Musical Rhythm Interventions on Student Nurses' Anger Expressions and States

Aim: The study aims to determine the effect of the anger management program to be implemented by integrating the rhythm component of music with the Gross Process Model of Emotion Regulation on the anger expression and anger types of nursing students determined to be under risk through screenings.

Materials and Methods: This single-blind factorial designed randomized experimental research was conducted with three control groups. The study group consisted of third-grade students (N=67) who were determined to have scores above average from The State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI). The study data were collected with pre-post tests and follow-up measurements using STAXI. The experimental interventions were completed in five sessions after pilot study with a specialist. The data were analyzed using one-way and two-way variance analyses (4x3 Factorial ANOVA). Effect size was measured with ε^2.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Introduction: Nursing students' anger regulation functionally has increasingly gained importance. It is known that cognitive behavioral approaches and music can be used as effective tools for young adults. It is important that the rhythm component of music be integrated with the Gross Model of Emotion Regulation, which analyzes the emotional regulation processes on a cognitive-behavioral basis, and new interventional tools be developed, which can be regularly and easily accessed in psychiatric nursing. The study results will shed light on future studies in terms of using the Gross Model, integrated in musical rhythm studies, to manage functional anger in student nurses.

Aim: The study aims to determine the effect of the anger management program to be implemented by integrating the rhythm component of music with the Gross Model of Emotion Regulation on the anger expression and anger types of nursing students determined to be under risk through screenings.

Materials and Methods: This single-blind factorial designed randomized experimental research was conducted with three control groups. The study group consisted of third-grade students (N=67) who were enrolled in Ege University Faculty of Nursing and determined to have scores above average from The State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI). The study data were collected from 38 students who met the inclusion criteria. They were collected with pre-post tests and follow-up measurements using STAXI and introductory information form developed in light of the literature. The Gross Model of Emotion Regulation intervention program, integrated with musical rhythms, was completed in five sessions after pilot study. The sessions in the musical rhythms were carried out in company with a specialist. The data were analyzed using one-way and two-way variance analyses (4x3 Factorial ANOVA). The statistical significance level was measured with p˂0.05, and effect size was measured with ε^2. Ethical permissions were obtained to conduct the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • İzmir, Turkey
        • Ege University Faculty of Nursing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 20 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • To be a third year student in the Faculty of Nursing
  • To have a higher score than the average limits calculated according to the State Anger score to be obtained from all students,
  • Willingness and volunteering for a musical practice

Exclusion Criteria:

  • To benefit from regular psychological counseling in the last three months,
  • To have a professional music education,
  • To have a physical handicap that will affect musical sense and skill.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control 1
Applied any intervention.
Active Comparator: Control 2
Gross's Process of Emotion Regulation Model interventions applied.

Interventions were based on Gross's Process Model which include the basis concepts of cognitive-behavioral therapy and carried on with five semi-structured sessions. Cognitive-behavioral theories accept the existence of a thought process (attention-perception-interpretation) that appears in the mind about the event just before the anger emerges. Therefore, anger studies with cognitive-behavioral approach generally proceed with the steps of gaining awareness about this concealed thought, identifying behavioral response and avoidance attitudes and thus regulating emotion. It consists of five 90-minute group sessions structured in this context. While being an accredited cognitive behavioral therapist, investigator have qualified to manage these approach.

The effectiveness of these semi-structured sessions were evaluated by using:

  1. Pretest application of STAXI
  2. Taking feedback after each intervention session
  3. Posttest application of STAXI
  4. Follow-up test application of STAXI
Active Comparator: Control 3
Musical rhythm interventions applied.

This musical group rhythm intervention was continued with 90 minute long five sessions. The students participated in the practice together with a music expert and lead researcher. The lead researcher took on the role of observer in these sessions. Each session was continued with warming, improvisation and targeted semi-structured rhythm practices aiming anger regulation. The effectiveness of these semi-structured sessions were evaluated by using:

  1. Pretest application of STAXI
  2. Taking feedback after each intervention session
  3. Posttest application of STAXI
  4. Follow-up test application of STAXI
Experimental: Experimental
Musical rhythm integrated Gross's Process of Emotion Regulation Model interventions applied.

Interventions were based on Gross's Process Model which include the basis concepts of cognitive-behavioral therapy and carried on with five semi-structured sessions. Cognitive-behavioral theories accept the existence of a thought process (attention-perception-interpretation) that appears in the mind about the event just before the anger emerges. Therefore, anger studies with cognitive-behavioral approach generally proceed with the steps of gaining awareness about this concealed thought, identifying behavioral response and avoidance attitudes and thus regulating emotion. It consists of five 90-minute group sessions structured in this context. While being an accredited cognitive behavioral therapist, investigator have qualified to manage these approach.

The effectiveness of these semi-structured sessions were evaluated by using:

  1. Pretest application of STAXI
  2. Taking feedback after each intervention session
  3. Posttest application of STAXI
  4. Follow-up test application of STAXI

This musical group rhythm intervention was continued with 90 minute long five sessions. The students participated in the practice together with a music expert and lead researcher. The lead researcher took on the role of observer in these sessions. Each session was continued with warming, improvisation and targeted semi-structured rhythm practices aiming anger regulation. The effectiveness of these semi-structured sessions were evaluated by using:

  1. Pretest application of STAXI
  2. Taking feedback after each intervention session
  3. Posttest application of STAXI
  4. Follow-up test application of STAXI

The students participated in the practice together with a music expert and lead researcher. The lead researcher ensured the integration of rhythm applications into the Process Model through cognitive-behavioral semi-structured interventions. Five semi-structured 90-minute group sessions were performed. The effectiveness of the experiment was evaluated by using:

  1. Pretest application of STAXI
  2. Taking feedback after each intervention session
  3. Posttest application of STAXI
  4. Follow-up test application of STAXI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anger State and Anger Expressions (first evaluation with posttest)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 months
Anger state and expressions were evaluated with using The State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory. This scale originally organized by Charles D. Spielberger in 1988. The scale, which evaluated trait anger (10 items) and state anger behavior (24 items), was adapted to Turk society by Özer N. in 1992. This tool was used to diagnose anger severity and behavioral reactions of anger in many national studies in child, adolescent and adult groups. Scale's Trait Anger dimension (anger expressions) were separated in three subscales as 'anger out', 'anger in' and 'anger control' which each includes eight items (subscale total score min:8, max:32). State Anger subscale has 10 items and total score range is between 10-40 points.
Through study completion, an average of 4 months
Anger State and Anger Expressions (second evaluation with follow up)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 7 months
Anger state and expressions were evaluated with using The State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory.
Through study completion, an average of 7 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gizem Beycan Ekitli, PhD

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 21, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 21, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 21, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 22, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EgeTrial

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anger

Clinical Trials on Gross's Process of Emotion Regulation Model Interventions

Subscribe