Trial of Emotion Regulation for Inappropriate Anger Expression

July 17, 2021 updated by: Johan Bjureberg, Karolinska Institutet

Randomized Controlled Trial of Emotion Regulation for Inappropriate Anger Expression

The overall aim of the project is to develop three internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapies for inappropriate anger expression to test the isolated and combined effects of two types of regulation strategies, emotional awareness and cognitive reappraisal. Treatments will be evaluated in a stratified single blind parallel randomized block design, along with a pooled interrupted time series design. Self-recruited adults with elevated levels of anger will be stratified based on baseline level of anger. The particular aims are to examine:

  1. the overall and separate effects of emotional awareness training, cognitive reappraisal training, and emotional awareness and cognitive reappraisal training on anger and aggression;
  2. whether treatment effects are differentially moderated by baseline levels of emotional awareness, cognitive reappraisal, anger expression-out, anger expression-out, anger control-in, and trait anger;
  3. whether the treatment effects are mediated by changes in emotional awareness, cognitive reappraisal, and anger control-in.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  1. Following the intention-to-treat principle, all primary data models will include all individuals as randomized. 3-month follow-up will be considered as the primary end-point. We will analyze both (1) overall treatment effect of all treatments (active treatment phase and 3-month follow-up compared to baseline) and (2) the relative efficacy for the emotional awareness training, cognitive reappraisal training, and emotional awareness and cognitive reappraisal training, respectively. We expect that, compared to a prolonged baseline phase, all treatments will result in greater improvements in on both primary and secondary outcomes. Further, we predict that the combined intervention will produce, on average, the strongest effects on primary and secondary outcomes relative to the separate interventions. We expect that cognitive reappraisal training will result in greater improvements relative to emotional awareness as a standalone treatment.
  2. Growth models that include the interaction terms between experimental conditions (contrast coded) and baseline levels of moderator variables (as continuous measures) will be utilized to examine moderated treatment effects. Significant interactions will be examined following recommendations for probing interactions in growth models.
  3. Weekly measurements of mediators will be analyzed with state-of-the-art methods for longitudinal mediation analysis, and we aim to to examine associations among process and outcome variables both within and between individuals as a function of condition and treatment phase.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

234

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Stockholm, Sweden, 113 64
        • Centre for Psychiatry Research Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County Council

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • experience of inappropriate anger expression that leads to significant distress or interferes with daily life (based on the STAXI-II)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • risk for violent behavior that may harm others
  • prior convictions of violence/abuse
  • ongoing psychological treatment that may conflict with the offered treatment
  • change in psychotropic medication within 2 months prior to enrollment
  • severe psychiatric disorder, such as severe depression or risk of suicide
  • alcohol or drug problems
  • life circumstances that interfere with treatment (e.g., homeless)
  • pronounced language skill deficits and learning difficulties (as the treatment format assumes normal reading and writing skills)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Emotional awareness
4 modules of emotional awareness training
Emotional awareness training is delivered via an internet platform during 4 weeks and includes therapist contact several times per week via the platform.
Experimental: Cognitive reappraisal
4 modules cognitive reappraisal training
Cognitive reappraisal training is delivered via an internet platform during 4 weeks and includes therapist contact several times per week via the platform.
Experimental: Awareness + reappraisal
4 modules emotional awareness and cognitive reappraisal training
Emotional awareness and cognitive reappraisal training is delivered via an internet platform during 4 weeks and includes therapist contact several times per week via the platform.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 (Subscales: Anger-out, Anger-in)
Time Frame: Change from baseline, once every week during treatment (0-4 weeks after baseline), and 3 months after treatment has ended.
Levels of State-trait anger Expression. The subscales Anger Expression-Out (range: 8-32), Anger Expression-In (range: 8-32), and State Anger (range: 15-60) will be used, with higher scores indicating more anger.
Change from baseline, once every week during treatment (0-4 weeks after baseline), and 3 months after treatment has ended.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Subscale: Reappraisal)
Time Frame: Change from baseline, once every week during treatment (0-4 weeks after baseline), and 3 months after treatment has ended.
Levels of reappraisal from the subscale Reappraisal (range: 6-35, with higher scores indicating more reappraisal).
Change from baseline, once every week during treatment (0-4 weeks after baseline), and 3 months after treatment has ended.
Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire (Subscales: Nonreactivity, Non-judging)
Time Frame: Change from baseline, once every week during treatment (0-4 weeks after baseline), and 3 months after treatment has ended.
Levels of nonreactivity to inner experiences (range: 6-30; with higher scores indicating more nonreactivity) nonjudging of experience (range: 5-25; with higher scores indicating more nonjudging).
Change from baseline, once every week during treatment (0-4 weeks after baseline), and 3 months after treatment has ended.
State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 (Subscale: Anger control-in)
Time Frame: Change from baseline, once every week during treatment (0-4 weeks after baseline), and 3 months after treatment has ended.
Levels of anger control-in (range: 8-32; higher scores indicating more anger control-in).
Change from baseline, once every week during treatment (0-4 weeks after baseline), and 3 months after treatment has ended.
State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 (Subscales: Trait anger, Anger control-out, State anger)
Time Frame: Change from baseline, 4 weeks after treatment starts, and 3 months after treatment has ended
Levels of State-Trait Anger Expression. The subscales Trait Anger (range: 10-40; higher scores indicating more trait anger), Anger Control-Out (range: 8-32; higher scores indicating more anger control-out), State Anger (range: 15-60; higher scores indicating more anger control-in).
Change from baseline, 4 weeks after treatment starts, and 3 months after treatment has ended
Aggression Questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from baseline, 4 weeks after treatment starts, and 3 months after treatment has ended. Ranges from 0-87, with higher higher scores indicating more aggression problems.
Levels of aggression (range 0-87). Higher scores indicate more aggression.
Change from baseline, 4 weeks after treatment starts, and 3 months after treatment has ended. Ranges from 0-87, with higher higher scores indicating more aggression problems.
Anger Rumination Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline, 4 weeks after treatment starts, and 3 months after treatment has ended
Levels of anger rumination (range: 19-76). Higher scores indicate more anger rumination.
Change from baseline, 4 weeks after treatment starts, and 3 months after treatment has ended
Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from baseline, 4 weeks after treatment starts, and 3 months after treatment has ended
Levels of mindfulness (range: 29-145). Higher scores indicate more mindfulness.
Change from baseline, 4 weeks after treatment starts, and 3 months after treatment has ended
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Subscale Suppression)
Time Frame: Change from baseline, once every week during treatment (0-4 weeks after baseline), and 3 months after treatment has ended.
Levels of suppression (range: 1-28). Higher scores indicate more suppression.
Change from baseline, once every week during treatment (0-4 weeks after baseline), and 3 months after treatment has ended.
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: Change from baseline, 4 weeks after treatment starts, and 3 months after treatment has ended
Sleep quality (range: 0-21). Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.
Change from baseline, 4 weeks after treatment starts, and 3 months after treatment has ended
Perceived Stress Scale 10 item version
Time Frame: Change from baseline, once every week during treatment (0-4 weeks after baseline), and 3 months after treatment has ended.
Stress (range: 0-40). Higher scores indicate more negative stress.
Change from baseline, once every week during treatment (0-4 weeks after baseline), and 3 months after treatment has ended.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment Credibility Scale
Time Frame: 1 week after treatment starts
Treatment credibility and expectancy (range: 0-50) with higher scores indicating greater credibility/expectancy.
1 week after treatment starts
Client satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: 4 weeks after treatment starts
Levels of client treatment satisfaction (range: 8-32) with higher scores indicating more satisfaction.
4 weeks after treatment starts

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Johan Bjureberg, PhD, Karolinska Institutet

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 5, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 16, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 16, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018/2253-31/5

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inappropriate Anger Expression

Clinical Trials on Internet-delivered emotional awareness training

Subscribe