Impact of Positive Airway Pressure Therapy on Clinical Outcomes in Older Veterans With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Comorbid Obstructive Sleep Apnea (Overlap Syndrome)

September 3, 2025 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) are highly prevalent chronic respiratory diseases in the Veteran population. OSA co-occurring with COPD, known as Overlap Syndrome (OVS), is a complex chronic medical condition associated with grave consequences. OVS is highly prevalent in Veterans. Veterans with OVS may be at increased risk for cognitive deficits, poor sleep quality as well as a reduced quality of life (QoL). The overall objective is to study the effects of positive airway pressure therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with OVS.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There are no studies regarding the impact of PAP therapy on sleep disturbance, cognitive function and quality of life in patients with OVS. The investigators' rationale is that in patients with moderate-severe OVS, PAP therapy will effectively alleviate sleepiness, sleep disturbances and cognitive deficits, and, thereby, improve QoL. 'PAP' includes either continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or noninvasive positive airway pressure ventilation (NIPPV).

Objectives:

Specifically, the investigators will study the effectiveness of PAP therapy vs. conservative care in reducing daytime sleepiness and in improving sleep quality and QoL in older Veterans with OVS.

The investigators will also explore whether CPAP is non-inferior to noninvasive positive airway pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in reducing daytime sleepiness, sleep disturbances and neurocognitive dysfunction, and in improving QoL in older Veterans with OVS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

668

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201-1916
        • Recruiting
        • John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, MI
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Susmita Chowdhuri, MD MS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • OSA with moderate-to-severe disease, AHI 20 per hour by in-lab polysomnography with concomitant moderate-severe COPD based on pulmonary function tests (PFTS) and with past significant history (>10 pack-years) of smoking
  • Male or female gender
  • Age greater than or equal to 60 years
  • Stable treatment regimen for COPD

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or prior treatment with PAP or oral appliance
  • Central sleep apnea defined as central apnea index >5 per hour and comprising 50% of AHI
  • Known primary neuromuscular diseases
  • Disorders that may impact cognitive function including:

    • neurodegenerative disorders
    • traumatic brain injury
  • untreated PTSD and/or history of learning disability
  • Medicines that may cause or alter sleepiness: sedative hypnotics, or stimulants as these may alter the results
  • Patient is actively suicidal due to depression, unstable mental health condition
  • Epworth sleepiness score >16 (severe sleepiness) or a near-miss or prior automobile accident due to sleepiness within the past 12 months
  • Narcolepsy is the primary sleep disorder, with requirement of stimulant medications
  • Employed as a commercial driver or operating heavy machinery
  • On long-term oxygen therapy prior to start of study, more than 12 hr/day
  • Patients is unable to use either a nasal or face mask (e.g., facial trauma, claustrophobia)
  • Consumption of >3 alcoholic beverages per day or current use of some illicit drugs, as these may contribute to cognitive deficits
  • Patients who cannot give informed consent
  • Patients receiving hospice care
  • Pregnant women due to unknown risks

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Conservative care (control arm)
Eligible OVS patients will receive conservative care/usual care with education about sleep apnea and sleep hygiene via handouts and video instructions. This is the control arm.
Eligible OVS patients will receive conservative care/usual care with education about sleep apnea and sleep hygiene via handouts and video instructions. This is the control arm.
Active Comparator: PAP therapy arm
PAP Therapy will be provided to eligible patients with OVS. This is the active therapy arm.
Positive airway pressure therapy. OVS patients randomized to PAP therapy arm will be titrated to optimal PAP therapy per standard protocol and assigned to use PAP therapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neurocognitive function Trails A and Trails B
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Trails A and Trails B test will be administered to evaluate attention and psychomotor function. This score is adjusted for age, race, gender, and years of education. Scored on a Standard scale of 100 +/- 15 for normal ranges, above 115 is above average, below 85 is considered below average.
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Neurocognitive function PASAT
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
PASAT (Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test) will be administered to evaluate vigilance and executive function. The PASAT is recorded as the total number of correct responses (from 0-60), or the percent of correct responses out of 60 (from 0-100), where a higher value is a better outcome.
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Neurocognitive function Stroop color-word interference
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Stroop color-word interference test will be administered to evaluate executive function. This score is adjusted for age, and years of education. Scored on a Standard scale of 100 +/- 15 for normal ranges, above 115 is above average, below 85 is considered below average.
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Neurocognitive function DIGIT
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
DIGIT test will be administered to evaluate short-term and working memory. This score is adjusted for age. Scored on a Standard scale of 100 +/- 15 for normal ranges, above 115 is above average, below 85 is considered below average.
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Neurocognitive function WASI
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Abbreviated Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) will be administered to evaluate verbal comprehension and working memory. This score is adjusted for age. Scored on a Standard scale of 100 +/- 15 for normal ranges, above 115 is above average, below 85 is considered below average.
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Neurocognitive function WMS
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Wechsler Memory test (WMS) will be administered to measure Verbal comprehension, and working and visual memory. Scored on a Standard scale of 100 +/- 15, where a higher score is a better outcome.
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Neurocognitive function PVT
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT) will be administered to measure Alertness and vigilance, in terms of number of lapses and reaction time. The performance score ranges from 0-100, where a higher value is a better outcome.
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Neurocognitive function HVLT-R
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT-R) will be administered to evaluate Verbal learning and memory. Scored on a Standard scale of 100 +/- 15, where a higher score is a better outcome.
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Sleepiness ESS
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) score will be measured. This score is on a scale of 0-24, where a higher value indicates greater degree of sleepiness.
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Sleep quality PSQI
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a detailed assessment of subject sleep quality over the most recent month by considering seven "component" scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The sum of scores for these seven components yields one global score to assess sleep quality on a scale of "poor" to "good".
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Quality of life SF-36v2
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
QoL will be assessed using the survey SF-36v2 Health survey. Thirty-five of the SF-36v2 items are used to measure eight domains of health-related quality of life. These are on a scale of 0-100, where higher values indicate a better outcome.
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Quality of life FOSQ
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Disease specific QoL will be assessed using the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire FOSQ/(FOSQ). There are 5 subscale domains of the FOSQ (General Productivity, Social Outcome, Activity Level, Vigilance, and Intimate Relationships and Sexual Activity). There all range from 0-20, where a higher value is a better outcome. The total FOSQ is the sum of these subscale domains and ranges from 0-100, where a higher value is a better outcome.
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Quality of life SGRQ
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Disease specific QoL will be assessed using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). The SGRQ has three subscale domains (Symptoms, Activity, and Impacts), which range from 0-100, where a higher value indicates a worse outcome. The total SGRQ is the average of these subscale domains and is on a scale of 0-100, where a higher value is a worse outcome.
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hours of nightly positive airway pressure (PAP) use
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Collection of PAP adherence data from the smart card of the PAP machine or from online data.
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Patient preferance for type of PAP (PAP arm)
Time Frame: at 3 and 6 months
A visual analog scale to determine preference to CPAP vs NIPPV therapy. A scores will range from -10 to +10, where a higher score is better.
at 3 and 6 months
Fatigue severity
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS): FSS measures how fatigue affects motivation, exercise, physical functioning, carrying out duties, interfering with work, family, or social life. Where a higher value is a worse outcome.
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Sleep-dependent memory
Time Frame: At baseline and at 3 months
In a subgroup of patients, the investigators will perform Word-pair test and PVT before and after sleep period, this is an exploratory measure.
At baseline and at 3 months
Blood CO2 or bicarbonate level
Time Frame: At baseline and at 6 months
Test is being done to evaluate for presence or absence of hypercapnia
At baseline and at 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Susmita Chowdhuri, MD MS, John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, MI

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Conservative care (control arm)

Subscribe