Exploring Advanced Clinical Practitioner's Experience Developing Clinical Competence and Opinions on Role Identity

December 2, 2019 updated by: University of Sheffield

In the United Kingdom, there is an urgent need to reshape the National Health Service (NHS) workforce to equip it to meet the changing demands of the population it serves and deliver the vision set out in the Next Steps on the NHS Five Year Forward View (2017) and recently published NHS Plan (2019). One of the key elements to this is the continuing development, support and utilisation of Advanced Clinical Practice (ACP) roles.

Advanced Clinical Practitioners are educated to Masters Level in clinical practice and assessed as competent in practice using their expert clinical knowledge and skills. They have the freedom and authority to act, making their own decisions in the assessment, diagnosis and treatment of patients.

Although the level of education and assessment of competence are common for ACPs working in all areas, training and supervision varies between primary and secondary care, specialties and sites.

The proposed research will explore ACP experiences of how they develop clinical competence and their opinions on role identity, specifically:

  • Factors that have influenced their clinical competency achievements.
  • Training experience (clinical and external education opportunities)
  • Experience of educational/ clinical supervision and its benefits.
  • Self-identified knowledge gaps, with a focus on mental health.
  • Future ACP role identity

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

32

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Sheffield, United Kingdom, S1 4DA
        • University of Sheffield
        • Contact:
          • Maxine Kuczawski
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Susan Croft
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Julie Perrin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The participants will be NHS staff working in the Yorkshire and Bassetlaw region as ACPs (qualified or in training).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Qualified ACP or trainee ACP who has completed at least 1 years (FTE) of ACP clinical training
  • Currently working in this role within either Primary or Secondary Care and based in South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to communicate in English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
ACP
ACPs, either qualified or in training, working in the South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw area.
ACPs, qualified or in training, will be invited to participate by email. Interested participants will be provided with study materials and asked to complete an online eligibility questionnaire; if eligible, contact details will also be recorded. Participants will be invited to take part in a focus group about their experience in developing clinical competence and their opinions on role identity. Data collection will consist of focus groups.
Other Names:
  • Focus Groups

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Experiences and views of ACPs regarding their experience of developing clinical competence and opinions on role identity [Time frame: 120 minutes]
Time Frame: Jan-Dec 2020
Focus groups will follow a topic guide to explore the factors which influence participants experience of clinical competence, training experience and supervision. The focus groups will also discuss participants feelings in relation to self-identified knowledge gaps (focusing on mental health) and the future ACP role identity.
Jan-Dec 2020

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 3, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 3, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CHC-ACP2019

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nurse's Role

Clinical Trials on No intervention

3
Subscribe