Is Therapeutic Elastic Bandage As Effective As Corticosteroids Following Third Molar Surgery?

December 13, 2019 updated by: Aras Erdil, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University

Comparison Of The Effectiveness Of Submucosal Corticosteroid Injection And Elastic Therapeutic Bandage Applications On Pain, Swelling And Trismus After Surgical Removal Of Mandibular Third Molar Teeth

In this study; Among the patients randomized because of severe postoperative sequelae expected as a result of radiological and clinical examinations; nonsteroid antiinflammatory drug prescribed group compared with preoperative single dose intraoral submucosal corticosteroid administration and therapeutic elastic bandage application considering inflammatory symptoms' severity and health related quality of life following surgical removal of impacted third molars. The study hypothesis was formed stating that corticosteroid injection and elastic bandage application would reduce the inflammatory symptoms more than NSAID.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tokat, Turkey, 60100
        • Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, Faculty of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18-65 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class 1 physiological status
  • Consistent radiological and clinical data
  • Volunteered to participate in the study
  • Surgical difficulty score above 5 which was determined according to Pederson scale.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Being out of age range
  • Analgesic or antibiotic therapy history in last 30 days due to symptoms of related third molar
  • Smoking cigarette
  • Any pathology associated with impacted third molar
  • Active complaints on preoperative examination on the day of surgery
  • Immunosuppressed or diagnosed with malignancy
  • Diagnosed chronic diseases such as; Diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, cerebrovascular event, psychiatric diseases, coagulopathies
  • Autoimmune diseases
  • If total operation time exceeds 45 minutes
  • Patients who could not attend regular follow-up visits
  • Allergy to the medications prescribed or utilized in study protocol
  • Inconsistent clinical and radiological data

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Postoperative NSAID Prescription
Patients in this arm received common postoperative prescriptions following removal of their impacted third molars for seven days; twice a day 500 mg amoxicillin+125 mg clavulanic acid, twice a day 25 mg dexketoprofen trometamol and three times a day 1.5 mg/ml clorhexidine gluconate+1.2 mg/ml benzydamine hydrochloride containing 200 ml mouthwash.
Patients were instructed to record the number of drugs they used until the second and seventh postoperative days.
Other Names:
  • Arveles 25 mg 20 tablets
Active Comparator: Preoperative Submucosal Corticosteroid Injection
Patients in this arm were administered 8mg/2ml dexamethasone 21-phosphate preoperatively after local anesthesia were obtained. Injection site was the depth of buccal sulcus near operation site. For the patients in this arm 25 mg dexketoprofen trometamol was excluded from postoperative prescription in order not to affect the anti-inflammatory effects of corticosteroid. Instead of NSAID, three times a day 500 mg paracetamol was prescribed. The patients were advised not to exceed maximal dosage of 3000 mg (6 tablets) in a day.
Injections were administered in the immediate preoperative period as a single shot.
Other Names:
  • Dekort 8mg/2ml Intramuscular (IM)/ Intravenous (IV)
Active Comparator: Postoperative Therapeutic Elastic Bandage Application
In this arm the therapeutic elastic bandage applications were immediately performed after removal of mandibular third molars. The distance between tragus-lateral commissura line and supraclavicular lymph nodes was measured and the tapes were then cut into 5 tails. The base of the tape was placed on supraclavicular lymph nodes and tails were placed on the site to cover parotid, submandibular, submental and superficial cervical lymph nodes. The tapes were removed on postoperative second day.
The bands' lengths were individually measured and divided into five equal parts up to 2/3 of their lengths to obtain fan-type shape.
Other Names:
  • Kinesio Tex Gold Fingerprint (FP)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Preoperative Pain Intensity
Time Frame: On the day of surgery preoperatively
The patients were asked to mark their pain intensities on a Numerical Rating Scale in which '0' means no pain, '5' means moderate pain and '10' means worst imaginable pain on the day of surgery preoperatively.
On the day of surgery preoperatively
Change From Baseline Maximal Mouth Opening on Postoperative Follow Up Visits
Time Frame: Preoperatively on the day of surgery, postoperative second and seventh days.
All patients' maximal mouth opening were measured and recorded as the distance between upper and lower right central incisors.
Preoperatively on the day of surgery, postoperative second and seventh days.
Change From Baseline Facial Measurements on Postoperative Follow Up Visits
Time Frame: Preoperatively on the day of surgery, postoperative second and seventh days.
Measurements were performed on the ipsilateral site between tragus and lateral commissura, lateral canthus and angle of mandible with a flexible ruler. The obtained values' average amounts were calculated and recorded for each patient.
Preoperatively on the day of surgery, postoperative second and seventh days.
Oral Analgesic Consumption-1
Time Frame: Postoperative Second Day
The patients were asked to record the amounts of consumed analgesic tablets (tablets per day) until first follow up visit.
Postoperative Second Day
Postoperative Pain Intensity-1
Time Frame: Postoperative Second Day
The patients were asked to mark their pain intensities on a Numerical Rating Scale in which '0' means no pain, '5' means moderate pain and '10' means worst imaginable pain.
Postoperative Second Day
Postoperative Pain Intensity-2
Time Frame: Postoperative Seventh Day
The patients were asked to mark their pain intensities on a Numerical Rating Scale in which '0' means no pain, '5' means moderate pain and '10' means worst imaginable pain.
Postoperative Seventh Day
Oral Analgesic Consumption-2
Time Frame: Postoperative Seventh Day
The patients were asked to record the amounts of consumed analgesic tablets (tablets per day) between first and last follow up visits.
Postoperative Seventh Day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wound Healing Scores
Time Frame: Postoperative second and seventh days.
Extraction wound healing rates were evaluated by Landry's healing index. The index scores were classified as; 1. Very poor, 2. Poor, 3. Good, 4. Very Good and 5. Excellent.
Postoperative second and seventh days.
Oral Health Impact Profile
Time Frame: Preoperatively on the day of surgery, postoperative second and seventh days.
Oral health-related quality of life was followed up with Oral Health Impaction Profile-14 questionnaire (Turkish Version). The investigators aimed to detect the alterations in quality of life due to surgical intervention and the other treatment modalities. The obtainable scores vary between 0-56 points. Lower scores indicate better postoperative physical and psychological conditions.
Preoperatively on the day of surgery, postoperative second and seventh days.
Postoperative Symptom Severity Evaluation
Time Frame: Postoperative seventh day.
Postoperative inflammatory symptoms were evaluated with the postoperative symptom severity scale at the end of the follow-up period individually. The scale scores vary between 0%-100%. The higher scores indicate that the individual experienced severe symptoms. The investigators aimed to detect the severity of symptoms from the point of the patient's view.
Postoperative seventh day.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Nihat Akbulut, Assoc. Dr., Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 2, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 26, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

November 21, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

All individual participant data (IPD) related to study protocol and results will be shared during submitting as an article.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The study will be transformed to an article in six months.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

All IPD and supporting information data will be accessible after publication of the article

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Third Molar Surgery

Clinical Trials on Dexketoprofen Trometamol

Subscribe