The Effect of Respiratory Training on Exercise Tolerance in COPD (ERTET)

December 16, 2019 updated by: Francois Maltlais, Laval University

The Effect of Respiratory Training With Normocapnic Hyperpnea on Exercise Tolerance in COPD

Exercise intolerance is one of the key disabling factors in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although multifactorial, exercise intolerance involves physiological interactions between respiratory and locomotor muscles that may contribute to further reducing exercise tolerance in COPD. The respiratory muscle work during exercise is closely related to breathing and could induce respiratory muscle fatigue in patients with COPD.

Respiratory muscle training is an intervention strategy that is sometimes proposed for some patients with COPD, especially whose with inspiratory muscle weakness. It was reported that inspiratory muscle training improves inspiratory muscle endurance and strength, dyspnea and exercise tolerance. There are two types of inspiratory muscle training, inspiratory muscle training against a resistive loading and normocapnic hyperpnoea. The advantage of normocapnic hyperpnoea compared to resistive training is the possibility to simulate the exercise ventilation level while maintaining stable the partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide and end-tidal pressure of carbon dioxide and to solicit the inspiratory and expiratory muscles together, which could increase respiratory muscle tolerance and avoid their fatigue during whole-body exercise.

Therefore, the aim of this project is to study the effect of normocapnic hyperpnoea training on exercise tolerance in patients with COPD.

We hypothesize that greater improvement in cycling exercise tolerance will be observed following 6-weeks normocapnic hyperpnoea training compared to a sham intervention in patients with COPD.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Québec, Canada, G1V 4G5
        • Recruiting
        • Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec
        • Principal Investigator:
          • François Maltais, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

38 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 40 years;
  • Chronic airflow obstruction : FEV1/FVC < 0.7, FEV1 of 30 to 80% predicted, after bronchodilation;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to perform a cycling exercise;
  • Diagnosed of one of more comorbidities that may limit exercise tolerance : cardiovascular, metabolic, endocrine, gastrointestinal, renal, neurological or rheumatologically disease;
  • Recent COPD exacerbation (< 3 months);
  • Recent cancer;
  • A daily dose of Prednisone > 10 mg;
  • Hypoxemia at rest or during exercise: PaO2 < 60 mmHg or SpO2 ≤ 88%;
  • Body mass index > 30 kg/m²;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Skinfold at intercostal or vastus lateralis muscle > 1.5 cm.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Training intervention
The effect of 6-weeks of respiratory training with normocapnic hyperpnoea on exercise tolerance
Patients will perform for 6-weeks, 15 min twice daily, 5 days a week at 60% of the peak of minute ventilation, at home by means of a respiratory device (SpiroTiger, Idiag, Fehraltorf, CH).
Sham Comparator: Sham intervention
The effect of 6-weeks of respiratory training with normocapnic hyperpnoea on exercise tolerance in the training group compared to the sham group.
Patients will perform for 6-weeks, 15 min twice daily, 5 days a week at rest's minute ventilation, at home by means of a respiratory device (SpiroTiger, Idiag, Fehraltorf, CH).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in exercise tolerance (time [seconds])
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), 7 weeks
Constant workrate cycling exercise time at 75% of power peak.
Baseline (week 0), 7 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Minute ventilation responses (flow [L/min])
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), 7 weeks
Minute ventilation during the constant workrate cycling exercise will be determined using a portable gas analysis system.
Baseline (week 0), 7 weeks
Change in respiratory muscle strength (pressure [cm H2O])
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), 7 weeks
Maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures will be assessed with a portable manometer before and at end the constant workrate cycling exercise.
Baseline (week 0), 7 weeks
Change in muscle oxygenation (from baseline [%])
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), 7 weeks
Deoxyhemoglobin/myoglobin concentrations measured by near-infrared spectroscopy of intercostal and vastus lateralis muscle during the constant workrate cycling exercise
Baseline (week 0), 7 weeks
Change in cardiac output (flow [L/min])
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), 7 weeks
Arterial blood pressures and cardiac output will be non-invasively measured by a finger photoplethysmography device during the constant workrate cycling exercise
Baseline (week 0), 7 weeks
Isometric muscle strength (force [Kg])
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), 7 weeks
Maximum voluntary isometric contraction with twitch tension induced by supramaximal magnetic stimulation of the femoral nerve will be realized before and 15 minutes after the constant workrate cycling exercise.
Baseline (week 0), 7 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Francois Maltais, MD, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec (IUCPQ)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 14, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Clinical Trials on Normocapnic hyperpnoea intervention

3
Subscribe