Stochastic Resonance Applied to Amblyopia Training and the Plasticity of Brain

December 24, 2019 updated by: National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

The prevalence of Taiwan's population with amblyopia is 2-5%. Amblyopia affects the daily life and learning ability. The human visual system can be developed normally with exposure of clear images on the retina, which often drive the development and projection of optic nerves progressively. In general, the visual acuity progresses gradually with age. A normal vision is relatively mature until 8 years old. Several types of amblyopia (strabismic amblyopia, refractive amblyopia, and deprivation amblyopia) are identified. The refractive amblyopia and deprivation amblyopia must be corrected by wearing glasses or surgeries. Otherwise, amblyopia is often corrected by occlusion of the dominant eye or amblyopia training. The Cambridge Stimulator (CAM) with rotating grating is commonly used in clinic in Taiwan. The principle of the CAM allows subjects to draw pictures on the plate in coincidence with occlusion of the dominant eye. The parents have to go with their children to a hospital weekly. The CAM training is a stereotyped visuomotor behavior, which usually causes fatigue and uninteresting results for children.

Recently, some computer games have been incorporated with CAM training. However, their clinical impact on amblyopia is largely unknown. Moreover, most of studies don't have long-term tracking, and they only use limited assessments. In this project, a home-based training would be built for children with amblyopia. A CAM training with a hierarchical structure with story-based organization would be implemented in the tablet. It will save time for children and parents for traffic between the home and hospital. The CAM training with organized structure would increase acceptability and create subjects' motivation for long-term training. In addition, a stochastic resonance theory would be incorporated with the CAM training to potentiate the learning curve of a visuomotor skill in young children. Five systematic assessments, including visual acuity, grating acuity, contrast sensitivity, and 2 measurements of visual evoked potentials (VEPs), would be used. The investigators hypothesized that the rotating grating stimulation and stochastic resonance stimulation groups showed significant enhancement of the visual functions compared with the control group and performance of the VEPs toward better eye through the home-based training apparatus.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 8 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants were 4-8 years old.
  2. Participant had binocular or monocular best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of ≤0.8, or they exhibited binocular BCVA difference of ≥0.2.
  3. Participant had the wearing of optimal spectacle correction.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Children with deprivation amblyopia were excluded.
  2. Children with ptosis were excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control group
This group received eye-hand practice for drawing pictures.
Each training session was limited to 15 minutes a day, 5 days a week. The entire training period was 6 months.
EXPERIMENTAL: Grating group
This group received eye-hand practice for drawing pictures with rotating grating stimuli of various spatial frequencies.
Each training session was limited to 15 minutes a day, 5 days a week. The entire training period was 6 months.
EXPERIMENTAL: Random dot group
This group received eye-hand practice for drawing pictures with rotating grating stimuli of various spatial frequencies constructed by random dots of stochastic resonance.
Each training session was limited to 15 minutes a day, 5 days a week. The entire training period was 6 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual acuity (VA)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline VA at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months
Landolt C chart was used.
Change from Baseline VA at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months
Grating acuity (GA)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline GA at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months
Horizontal or vertical square-wave grating stimuli were used.
Change from Baseline GA at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months
Contrast sensitivity (CS)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline CS at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months
Circular-shape horizontal square-wave grating stimuli were used.
Change from Baseline CS at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months
Visual evoked potential (VEP)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline VEP at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months
Transient VEP and Steady state VEP of the Cortical EEG were recorded.
Change from Baseline VEP at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total practice duration
Time Frame: Throughout 6 months
Practice duration was recorded in the tablet.
Throughout 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fu-Zen Shaw, Professor, Department of Pyschology, National Cheng Kung University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 15, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 31, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 31, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Amblyopia

Clinical Trials on Portable tablet

3
Subscribe