- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04220216
Pilot Study of the Haymakers for Hope Fitness Program
A Pilot Study to Assess the Haymakers for Hope Fitness Program in Cancer Survivors
This research study is assessing the effect of an exercise program on cancer survivors.
The exercise program is Haymakers for Hope 16-week exercise program
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a pilot study, it is the first time investigators are examining the effect of this exercise program on cancer survivors physical and emotional functioning. The exercise programs is based on the conditioning program used by boxers.- Haymakers for Hope 16-week exercise program
- The research study procedures include screening for eligibility and study treatment including evaluations and follow up visits.
Participants will attend the 16-week program of boxing conditioning. It is expected that about 10 people will take part in this research study.
- This 16 week will include supervised exercises designed to improve strength, flexibility, balance and cardiopulmonary fitness.
- There will be 4 sessions of 1 hour each week for each of the 10 participants.
- The program will be conducted at gymnasiums contracted with the H4H program and outcomes assessments at Massachusetts General Hospital and the gymnasiums..
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Cancer diagnosis excluding non-melanoma skin cancer
- Age ≥ 18 years
- ECOG performance status ≤1
- Medical clearance by treating clinician
- No known contraindications to moderate intensity exercise such as (but not limited to) brain metastases, serious or non-healing wound, peripheral neuropathy greater than or equal to Grade 3, or myocardial infarction within 1- year.
- Able to complete forms and understand instruction in English
- Willing and able to attend the H4H program for 16 weeks
- Willing and able to complete the baseline and follow-up visits at MGH
- Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants who have had chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 4 weeks (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin C) prior to entering the study or those who have not recovered from adverse events due to agents administered more than 4 weeks earlier
- Participants who have had surgery within 4 weeks prior to entering the study or those who have not recovered from adverse events due to surgery more than 4 weeks earlier.
- Blastic or lytic bone lesions
- Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
- Chest pain brought on by physical activity
- Pregnant women or women intending to become pregnant during the study period
- Presence of dementia or major psychiatric illness that would preclude participation in a group program
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: H4H fitness program
The research study procedures include screening for eligibility and study treatment including evaluations and follow up visits.
|
4 weekly, 1 hour exercise sessions
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of Attendance
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
Participants will be considered to have completed the fitness program if they attend at least 70% of the sessions
|
16 weeks
|
|
Rate of Completion
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
Feasibility will be demonstrated if ≥60% of participants complete the fitness program
|
16 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in cardiopulmonary fitness as assessed by the 6-minute walk test
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences
|
16 weeks
|
|
Change in strength
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences
|
16 weeks
|
|
Change in QOL as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences
|
16 weeks
|
|
Change in psychological well-bring as assessed by the Ryff Psychological Well-Being Scale (Min score: 42, Max score: 252. A higher score indicating higher psychological well-being)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences
|
16 weeks
|
|
Change in fatigue as assessed by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences
|
16 weeks
|
|
Change in sleep quality as assessed by the Rand Medical Outcome Survey (MOS) Sleep Scale (min score: 0; max score: 100. A higher core indicates more sleep problems)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences
|
16 weeks
|
|
Change in anxiety as assessed by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (min score: 0; max score: 21. A higher score indicates more anxiety)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences
|
16 weeks
|
|
Change in depression as assessed by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (min score: 0; max score: 21. A higher score indicates more depression)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences
|
16 weeks
|
|
Change in body composition as assessed by change in total lean mass, extremity lean mass, total fat and trunk fat mass, as well as visceral adipose tissue mass which will be quantified using Hologic APEX 3.1 software.
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences
|
16 weeks
|
|
Change in physical activity level as assessed using the using the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire.
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences
|
16 weeks
|
|
Change in lipid profile
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
Summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences).
(total cholesterol: mg/dL; triglycerides: mg/dL; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol mg/dL; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol mg/dL; very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: mg/dL; cholesterol/HDL ratio mg/dL).
|
16 weeks
|
|
Change in hemoglobin A1c (%)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
Summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences), hemoglobin A1c reported as percentage of average blood sugar level (mg/dL or mmol/L), higher % corresponds to higher average blood sugar levels (normal A1C level is below 5.7%)
|
16 weeks
|
|
Change in c-reactive protein (mg/L)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
Summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences), mg/L (hs-CRP level of 1 mg/L or lower indicates low risk of CVD, hs-CRP level of 1-3 mg/L indicates moderate risk of CVD, hs-CRP level of greater than 3 mg/L indicates high risk of CVD)
|
16 weeks
|
|
Change in interleukin-6 (pg/mL)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
Summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences), pg/mL
|
16 weeks
|
|
Change in tumor necrosis factor alpha (pg/mL)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
Summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences), pg/mL
|
16 weeks
|
|
Change in insulin (mcU/mL)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
Summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences) (mcU/mL)
|
16 weeks
|
|
Change in leptin (ng/mL)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
Summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences) (ng/mL)
|
16 weeks
|
|
Change in adiponectin level (microgram/mL)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
Summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences) (microgram/mL)
|
16 weeks
|
|
Change in insulin-like growth factor (ng/mL)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
Summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences) (ng/mL)
|
16 weeks
|
|
Change in homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (estimates beta cell function (%B) and insulin sensitivity (%S), as percentages of a normal reference population)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
Summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences).
Plasma glucose: mmol/L (or mg/dL), Insulin: pmol/L (or microunits/mL)
|
16 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Elizabeth O'Donnell, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 19-426
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Life
-
Ziekenhuis Oost-LimburgRecruitingQuality of Life | Postoperative Quality of Recovery | Health-Related Quality-of-LifeBelgium
-
B. Braun Medical SAUnknownQuality of Life of Colostomized Patient
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownImproving Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliUniversity of BolognaCompletedImprove Quality of LifeItaly
-
Children's National Research InstituteCompletedProfessional Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Mattu UniversityCompletedBreif Description: Patients' Quality of Life ofEthiopia
-
Region VästmanlandUnknownHealth Related Quality of Life
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedHealth Related Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Institute of Oncology LjubljanaUnknownHealth-related Quality of LifeSlovenia
-
Oslo University HospitalNorwegian Fund for Postgraduate Training in PhysiotherapyCompletedHealth-Related Quality of LifeNorway
Clinical Trials on H4H fitness program
-
University of MichiganAmerican Diabetes AssociationCompletedMetabolic SyndromeUnited States
-
Pennington Biomedical Research CenterAmerican Diabetes Association; Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge; American...CompletedFeasibility of the Camp Power Up Program on Children's Body Weight and Quality of Life (CampPowerUp)Quality of Life | Obesity, Childhood | Weight Change, BodyUnited States
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompleted
-
Hanze UniversityUniversity Medical Center GroningenCompleted
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterCompletedPediatric Obesity | Health Behavior | Body Mass Index | Self EsteemUnited States
-
University of KonstanzGerman Research FoundationCompleted
-
University of South CarolinaNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)RecruitingHealth Related Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompletedCognitive DeclineUnited States
-
NYU Langone HealthCompletedTraumatic Brain Injury | Vascular Accident, BrainUnited States