Pilot Study of the Haymakers for Hope Fitness Program

January 18, 2022 updated by: Elizabeth O'Donnell, Massachusetts General Hospital

A Pilot Study to Assess the Haymakers for Hope Fitness Program in Cancer Survivors

This research study is assessing the effect of an exercise program on cancer survivors.

The exercise program is Haymakers for Hope 16-week exercise program

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a pilot study, it is the first time investigators are examining the effect of this exercise program on cancer survivors physical and emotional functioning. The exercise programs is based on the conditioning program used by boxers.- Haymakers for Hope 16-week exercise program

  • The research study procedures include screening for eligibility and study treatment including evaluations and follow up visits.
  • Participants will attend the 16-week program of boxing conditioning. It is expected that about 10 people will take part in this research study.

    • This 16 week will include supervised exercises designed to improve strength, flexibility, balance and cardiopulmonary fitness.
    • There will be 4 sessions of 1 hour each week for each of the 10 participants.
    • The program will be conducted at gymnasiums contracted with the H4H program and outcomes assessments at Massachusetts General Hospital and the gymnasiums..

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cancer diagnosis excluding non-melanoma skin cancer
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • ECOG performance status ≤1
  • Medical clearance by treating clinician
  • No known contraindications to moderate intensity exercise such as (but not limited to) brain metastases, serious or non-healing wound, peripheral neuropathy greater than or equal to Grade 3, or myocardial infarction within 1- year.
  • Able to complete forms and understand instruction in English
  • Willing and able to attend the H4H program for 16 weeks
  • Willing and able to complete the baseline and follow-up visits at MGH
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who have had chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 4 weeks (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin C) prior to entering the study or those who have not recovered from adverse events due to agents administered more than 4 weeks earlier
  • Participants who have had surgery within 4 weeks prior to entering the study or those who have not recovered from adverse events due to surgery more than 4 weeks earlier.
  • Blastic or lytic bone lesions
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
  • Chest pain brought on by physical activity
  • Pregnant women or women intending to become pregnant during the study period
  • Presence of dementia or major psychiatric illness that would preclude participation in a group program

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: H4H fitness program

The research study procedures include screening for eligibility and study treatment including evaluations and follow up visits.

  • Patients will attend the 16-week program of boxing conditioning.
  • This 16-week program will include supervised exercises designed to improve strength, flexibility, balance,and cardiopulmonary fitness.
  • There will be 4, 1-hour sessions each week per participant
4 weekly, 1 hour exercise sessions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Attendance
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Participants will be considered to have completed the fitness program if they attend at least 70% of the sessions
16 weeks
Rate of Completion
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Feasibility will be demonstrated if ≥60% of participants complete the fitness program
16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in cardiopulmonary fitness as assessed by the 6-minute walk test
Time Frame: 16 weeks
summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences
16 weeks
Change in strength
Time Frame: 16 weeks
summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences
16 weeks
Change in QOL as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General
Time Frame: 16 weeks
summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences
16 weeks
Change in psychological well-bring as assessed by the Ryff Psychological Well-Being Scale (Min score: 42, Max score: 252. A higher score indicating higher psychological well-being)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences
16 weeks
Change in fatigue as assessed by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue
Time Frame: 16 weeks
summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences
16 weeks
Change in sleep quality as assessed by the Rand Medical Outcome Survey (MOS) Sleep Scale (min score: 0; max score: 100. A higher core indicates more sleep problems)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences
16 weeks
Change in anxiety as assessed by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (min score: 0; max score: 21. A higher score indicates more anxiety)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences
16 weeks
Change in depression as assessed by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (min score: 0; max score: 21. A higher score indicates more depression)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences
16 weeks
Change in body composition as assessed by change in total lean mass, extremity lean mass, total fat and trunk fat mass, as well as visceral adipose tissue mass which will be quantified using Hologic APEX 3.1 software.
Time Frame: 16 weeks
summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences
16 weeks
Change in physical activity level as assessed using the using the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire.
Time Frame: 16 weeks
summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences
16 weeks
Change in lipid profile
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences). (total cholesterol: mg/dL; triglycerides: mg/dL; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol mg/dL; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol mg/dL; very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: mg/dL; cholesterol/HDL ratio mg/dL).
16 weeks
Change in hemoglobin A1c (%)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences), hemoglobin A1c reported as percentage of average blood sugar level (mg/dL or mmol/L), higher % corresponds to higher average blood sugar levels (normal A1C level is below 5.7%)
16 weeks
Change in c-reactive protein (mg/L)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences), mg/L (hs-CRP level of 1 mg/L or lower indicates low risk of CVD, hs-CRP level of 1-3 mg/L indicates moderate risk of CVD, hs-CRP level of greater than 3 mg/L indicates high risk of CVD)
16 weeks
Change in interleukin-6 (pg/mL)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences), pg/mL
16 weeks
Change in tumor necrosis factor alpha (pg/mL)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences), pg/mL
16 weeks
Change in insulin (mcU/mL)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences) (mcU/mL)
16 weeks
Change in leptin (ng/mL)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences) (ng/mL)
16 weeks
Change in adiponectin level (microgram/mL)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences) (microgram/mL)
16 weeks
Change in insulin-like growth factor (ng/mL)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences) (ng/mL)
16 weeks
Change in homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (estimates beta cell function (%B) and insulin sensitivity (%S), as percentages of a normal reference population)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Summarize changes from the baseline to follow-up assessment including calculation of the effect size (mean within-subject difference divided by standard deviation of differences). Plasma glucose: mmol/L (or mg/dL), Insulin: pmol/L (or microunits/mL)
16 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elizabeth O'Donnell, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 12, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 18, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 19-426

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on H4H fitness program

Subscribe