Dimethyl Fumarate (DMF, Tecfidera®) Persistence in RR-MS Patients Included in the French Patient Support Program OroSEP (TEC-ADHERE)

July 31, 2023 updated by: Biogen

Study on the Dimethyl Fumarate (DMF, Tecfidera®) Persistence of Remitting-relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (RR-MS) Patients Included in the French Patient Support Program (PSP) OroSEP

The primary objective is to compare oral dimethyl fumarate (DMF) persistence at six months in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS) participants initiating DMF with and without OroSEP patient support program (PSP), respectively.

The secondary objectives are: to compare oral DMF persistence at one month and three months in RR-MS participants initiating DMF with and without OroSEP PSP, respectively; To compare oral DMF adherence at six months in RR-MS participants initiating DMF with and without OroSEP PSP; To compare at three months and six months the reason of oral DMF discontinuation, in the two groups; To describe the percentage of participants with treatment-related adverse events globally and by class of adverse events, in the two groups of participants; To assess the evolution of participants' anxiety globally and to compare it at inclusion and at six months in participants with and without OroSEP PSP, respectively; To describe participants' satisfaction regarding oral DMF initiation and follow-up globally at six months and to compare it in patients with and without OroSEP PSP, respectively;

For OroSEP PSP group: To assess participants' satisfaction regarding their participation in OroSEP PSP at six months; To assess neurologists' satisfaction regarding their participation in OroSEP PSP, after the last participant last visit of center.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

353

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Agen, France, 47000
        • CH d'Agen
      • Aix-en-Provence, France, 13616
        • CH d'Aix-en-Provence
      • Amiens, France, 80000
        • CHU Amiens
      • Amiens, France, 80000
        • CHU d'Amiens
      • Angoulême, France, 16000
        • Cabinet Medical
      • Annecy, France, 74960
        • Cabinet Medical Neurolac
      • Antibes, France, 06600
        • CH Antibes
      • Antony, France, 92160
        • Hôpital Privé Antony
      • Arras, France, 62000
        • CH d'Arras
      • Bastia, France, 20600
        • CH de Bastia
      • Bayonne, France, 64100
        • Chic de Bayonne
      • Belfort, France, 90000
        • Cabinet du Dr Imad Malkoun
      • Biarritz, France, 64200
        • Cabinet des Drs Chanel-Soulier et Cheron
      • Bordeaux, France, 33200
        • Polyclinique Bordeaux-Caudéran
      • Bordeaux, France, 33000
        • Hôpital Pellegrin / Service : Neurologie
      • Carcassonne, France, 11000
        • CH de Carcassonne
      • Chatellerault, France, 86100
        • Cabinet des Drs Farhat et Samad
      • Cholet, France, 49300
        • Chde Cholet
      • Clamart, France, 92140
        • HIA Percy
      • Clamart, France, 92140
        • Pole de Sante du Plateau
      • Cornebarrieu, France, 31700
        • Clinique des Cèdres
      • Créteil, France, 94000
        • Hopital Henri Mondor
      • Dax, France, 40100
        • Ch General Dax
      • Dijon, France, 21000
        • CHU Dijon
      • Dijon, France, 21000
        • Cabinet du Dr Pierre Gras
      • Douai, France, 59500
        • CH de DOUAI
      • Eaubonne, France, 95600
        • CH Simone Veil d'Eaubonne
      • Gap, France, 05000
        • Polyclinique des Alpes du Sud
      • Grenoble Cedex 9, France, 38043
        • CHU Grenoble Alpes CS 10217
      • La Rochelle, France, 17000
        • Cabinet Medical
      • La Seyne-sur-Mer, France, 83500
        • Pôle Espace Santé 2
      • Libourne, France, 33500
        • Centre Hospitalier de Libourne
      • Lille, France, 59000
        • Cabinet médical Montebello
      • Lons-le-Saunier, France, 39016
        • Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal JURA-SUD
      • Lure, France, 70200
        • Chi de Haute Saone
      • Lyon, France, 69006
        • Cabinet Du Dr Neuschwander
      • Melun, France, 77000
        • Hopital
      • Montauban, France, 82000
        • CH de Montauban
      • Montpellier, France, 34000
        • Centre Medical Odysseum
      • Montpellier, France, 34090
        • Hopital Gui de Chaulliac
      • Mornant, France, 69440
        • Cabinet des Drs Lorenzi Pernot et Guilloton
      • Muret, France, 31600
        • Clinique D'Occitanie
      • Nimes, France, 30900
        • CHU Caremeau
      • Nîmes, France, 30900
        • CHU Caremeau
      • Orléans, France, 45100
        • Hôpital de la Source
      • Paris, France, 75014
        • Groupe Hospitalier Paris St Joseph
      • Paris, France, 75008
        • Centre Cosem Miromesnil
      • Paris, France, 75011
        • Cabinet du Dr Radia Djebbari
      • Paris, France, 75017
        • Cabinet Médical Monceau
      • Pau, France, 64000
        • Cabinet Medical
      • Poitiers, France, 86000
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers
      • Quimper Cedex, France, 29107
        • CHI de Cornouaille
      • Rambouillet, France, 78120
        • Cabinet des Drs Gugenheim et Esna
      • Roanne, France, 42300
        • Cabinet Du Dr Christophe Robin
      • Roubaix, France, 59100
        • Hopital Victor Provo
      • Soissons, France, 02200
        • CH de Soissons
      • Talence, France, 33400
        • Cabinet du Dr Annick Gayou-Joyeux
      • Toulon, France, 83000
        • HIA Sainte Anne
      • Toulouse cedex 9, France, 31059
        • Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet
      • Tours, France, 37000
        • Chu Bretonneau
      • Troyes, France, 10000
        • CH de Troyes
      • Valence, France, 26000
        • CH de Valence
      • Évreux, France, 27000
        • Cabinet de Dr Lotfi Kort

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Study population included participants with RR-MS treated with DMF in clinical practice.

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ability to understand the purpose and risks of the study and giving oral informed consent regarding TEC-ADHERE study and authorization to use protected health information (PHI) in accordance with national and local participant privacy regulations;
  • Diagnosis of RR-MS;
  • Initiating oral DMF according to Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) at the inclusion visit;
  • Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS) under 6.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with progressive form of Multiple Sclerosis (MS);
  • With memory or psychiatric disorders preventing them to complete questionnaires in the study.

Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Standard of Care (SoC) Group
SoC neurologists will include and follow-up all study participants who receive DMF according to their standard of care practice (non-coached participants).
DMF as prescribed as standard of care.
Other Names:
  • Tecfidera®
OroSEP PSP (OPSP) Group
OPSP neurologists will include and follow-up all study participants who receive DMF according to their standard of care practice and the OroSEP PSP (coached participants).
DMF as prescribed as standard of care.
Other Names:
  • Tecfidera®
PSPs is to support patient care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants with Oral Dimethyl Fumarate (DMF) Persistence at 6 Months
Time Frame: 6 months
Persistence is defined as the percentage of participant still being treated by oral DMF at 6 months, according to routine visit.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants with Oral Dimethyl Fumarate (DMF) Persistence at Both 1 Month and 3 Months
Time Frame: 1 month and 3 months
Persistence is defined as the percentage of participants still being treated by oral DMF at both 1 month and 3 months, according to routine practice.
1 month and 3 months
Percentage of Participant's with Adherence at 6 Months
Time Frame: 6 months
Participant's adherence is assessed through the validated Girerd questionnaire. This is a 6-item self-questionnaire completed by participants with a scale of 0 for "Yes" and 1 for "No" for each question. Points for each question are summed up to obtain a global score between 0 if all the questions are ticked with "Yes" (reflecting a bad adherence), and 6 if all questions are ticked "No" (reflecting a good adherence).
6 months
Percentage of Participants by Reason of Oral Dimethyl Fumarate (DMF) Discontinuation at 3 Months and 6 Months
Time Frame: 3 month and 6 months
Discontinuation of DMF therapy is defined by the presence of any of the following criteria: definitive discontinuation declared by the physician during routine follow-up visit through electronic case report form (eCRF); a temporary stop declared by the physician during routine visit at 3 months, without DMF resumption declared at 6 months by the physician; a switch to another DMT declared by the physician during routine follow-up visit through eCRF.
3 month and 6 months
Percentage of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: up to 6 months
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.
up to 6 months
Percentage of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs) Related to Treatment
Time Frame: up to 6 months
up to 6 months
Percentage of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
Time Frame: up to 6 months
up to 6 months
Percentage of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs) of Interest
Time Frame: up to 6 months
AEs of interest includes gastrointestinal disorders, flush, lymphopenia.
up to 6 months
Participant's Anxiety at Inclusion and at 6 Months
Time Frame: 0 months and 6 months
Participant's anxiety is assessed through the Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 (GAD-7) self-questionnaire. The GAD-7 is a questionnaire that is used primarily to detect possible generalized anxiety disorders, disorders of panic, social anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder. It is more specifically a self-questionnaire (completed by the participant) consisting of 7 items rated from 0 to 3. The total score is obtained by adding the score obtained to each item (score ranging from 0 to 21). A total score greater than 7 is suggestive of a generalized anxiety disorder.
0 months and 6 months
Participant's Satisfaction Regarding Dimethyl Fumarate (DMF) Treatment at 6 Months
Time Frame: 6 months
Participant's satisfaction regarding DMF treatment is assessed through the validated Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) score completed by the participant. The TSQM-9, a 9-items questionnaire, designed as a general measure of treatment satisfaction with medication. TSQM items are answered on 5- or 7-point Likert type scale and cover three domains, corresponding to distinct aspects related to the satisfaction of participants with their treatment (effectiveness, convenience and global satisfaction). A score can be obtained for each domain by summing the corresponding items transformed on a 0-100 scale. Higher value indicates more satisfaction, better perceived effectiveness, lower burden associated with better convenience.
6 months
Participant's Satisfaction Regarding their Participation in OroSEP Patient Support Program (PSP)
Time Frame: 6 month
Participant's satisfaction is assessed at Month 6 using a questionnaire completed by the participant consisting of 3 questions. Questions 1 and 2 are assessed using a Likert scale (1-5) with scale range 1= Strongly disagree to 5= Strongly agree. Question 3 is assessed using the net promoter scale (1-7), where 1 indicates "not at all likely" and 7 indicates "extremely likely". Higher values indicate higher satisfaction.
6 month
Neurologists' Satisfaction Regarding their Participation in OroSEP Patient Support Program (PSP)
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Neurologist's satisfaction is assessed after the last participant last visit of the site center using a 10-item questionnaire, completed by the physician. Question (Q) 1, Q3, Q4, Q6, Q7, Q8= is answered "Yes/No"; Q2= Lack of time, Lack of interest, Patient refused, Forget, No registration form available, Registration process too complicated / Other: specify; Q5= The availability of the call center, The monitoring of patient compliance, The coordination of biological assessments, Other: specify; Q9: 1 bad satisfaction, 10 good satisfaction and Q10 was an open answer.
up to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Medical Director, Biogen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 19, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 14, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 14, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

In accordance with Biogen's Clinical Trial Transparency and Data Sharing Policy on http://clinicalresearch.biogen.com/

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting

Clinical Trials on Dimethyl Fumarate

Subscribe