Safety and Efficacy of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Achilles Tendinopathy

September 4, 2020 updated by: Gesundheitszentrum Woergl

With this prospective, randomized, controlled trial the investigators want to investigate effects of a prolonged repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation (rPMS) intervention on Achilles tendinopathy and compare it to a well established intervention. This may provide clinicians with a new, non-pharmacological, non-invasive, near painless approach to treat tendinopathy.

Although promising results with comparable devices exist, a direct and valid conclusion on the overall clinical performance of the investigational device cannot be drawn. This is mainly due to different treatment protocols used in the literature and due to the lack of insight in the technical documentation of comparable devices. Further, the applied magnetic fields vary in their amplitude, frequency, waveform and/or stimulation durations.

Therefore, the main goal of this clinical investigation is the collection of clinical data on the clinical performance of the investigational device. This clinical data will subsequently serve as a main source for the clinical evaluation of the medical device.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Tendons are collagenous tissues that link muscle to bone, and in best case, a painless transmission of force allows voluntary movement over a life time. Although tendons show long time underestimated repair and remodelling capacities, some of them (e.g. the human patellar or Achilles tendon) remain quite prone to injury. To make things worse, tendinous tissue reveals incomplete healing capacities and treatments seem to be ineffective to avoid the high injury recurrence rate and/or the occurrence of chronic tendon pain. Thus, both elite and recreational athletes, as well as the non-sporting population or workplace employees often suffer from symptoms like tendon swelling, localized tenderness, activity related pain and impaired performance, also known as tendinopathy. Such pain-induced restriction of mobility frequently means the end of a sporting carrier, deteriorates the quality of life and patients have to live with all harmful consequences of physical inactivity. One tendon most commonly afflicted by this debilitating musculoskeletal injury is the Achilles tendon. Although it is the strongest tendon in our body, the prevalence for tendinopathy can be as high as 56% among certain athletes.

The repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) works through a deep operating, focused and painless stimulation mechanism generated by pulsed magnetic fields. This intervention is already successfully in use to accelerate the healing of bone fractures and to enhance the healing of operated rotator cuff tears. Additionally, data on in vitro tendon cells indicate the positive effect of rPMS on tendon tissue by stimulating cell proliferation, up-regulating tendon-specific gene expression and releasing anti-inflammatory cytokines and growth factors. More interestingly, intervention studies on the healing of rotator cuff tendon-to-bone injuries in rat models show increases in tendon stiffness and modulus and enhanced collagen organization, and type I collagen expression after prolonged rPMS without showing adverse effects in any mechanical or histological property. These results strongly support the hypothesis that rPMS might be effective in treating Achilles tendinopathy in humans. This intervention might reduce pain and functional limitations, reverse tendon degenerative changes and increase the impaired tendon mechanical and material properties.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Tirol
      • Wörgl, Tirol, Austria, 6300
        • Recruiting
        • Gesundheitszentrum Woergl
        • Contact:
          • Stephan Papp, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and non-pregnant women aged 18-60 years
  • Patients suffering from a gradually evolving painful condition in the Achilles tendon located at the midportion for at least 12 weeks (Diagnosis based on clinical examination showing a painful thickening of the Achilles tendon located at a level of 2 to 6cm above the tendon insertion, and confirmed by ultrasonography: local thickening of the tendon, irregular tendon structure with hypoechoic areas and irregular fiber orientation).
  • VISA-A score less than 65 at baseline.
  • Be informed of the nature of the study and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical suspicion of insertional disorders (pain at the site of the insertion of the Achilles tendon on the calcaneum)
  • Concomitant or previous participation in a clinical investigation within the last 3 months (wash out) prior to study inclusion
  • Clinical suspicion of an Achilles tendon rupture.
  • Suspicion of internal disorders: spondylarthropathy, gout, hyperlipidemia, Rheumatoid Arthritis and sarcoidosis.
  • Severe foot deformity
  • Condition that prevents the patients from executing an active exercise program
  • Pregnant or lactating females
  • History of treatment with corticosteroids, estrogens, long term quinolone antibiotics, and cholesterol drugs
  • Persons with electronic implants (e.g. pacemaker, cochlear implants, drug pump, deep brain stimulator, etc.)
  • Patients with organ transplants
  • Patients with closed, circular metal implants (e.g. subdermal implants, etc.)
  • Epilepsy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Repetitive pulsed magnetic stimulation
Patients randomized in this group will receive rPMS (80 milliTesla ; 2 Hertz; OMNITRON® promed; Healthfactories Holding GmbH) three times a week for a total of 12 weeks. Thereby they will be lying in a prone position or sitting for 20 minutes with the magnet coil positioned over the mid-portion of the affected Achilles tendon (manufactures instruction).

OMNITRON ProMed is a rPMS (repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation) device used for deep stimulation of muscles and/or neurones (outside the brain). The energy is delivered by way of a special round treatment coil, whose cover material is tested for biocompatibility.

The OMNITRON ProMed device produces a high-energy impulse field and stimulates tissue, in particular soft tissue, muscles and neurons, by means of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS). Short, extremely strong magnetic fields in the microsecond range are emitted non-invasively. OMNITRON ProMed works with short-term energy emission at a peak power of up to 60 million watts and a magnetic field strength of up to 100 milliTesla.

The intensity of treatment can be set between 20 and 100 %. The device automatically adjusts the magnetic field strength and the frequency of the pulses emitted depending on the intensity selected.

For comfortable transport and application the product is compact and portable.

ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Eccentric Calf Muscle Training for Achilles Tendinopathy
Two types of eccentric exercises will be used. The calf muscle will be eccentrically loaded both with the knee straight and with the knee bent. Each of the two exercises will include an increasing number of repetitions (1. Week, 2-3 weeks, 4-12 weeks) done in 3 sets (e.g. 3x15, 3x20, 3x30 repetitions). The patients will be informed that muscle soreness during the first 1 to 2 weeks of training was to be expected. Patients will receive a visual exercise protocol.

Patients will be asked to stand with their full body weight on the injured leg. From an upright body position and standing with all body weight on the forefoot and the ankle joint in plantar flexion, the calf muscle is then loaded by having the patient slowly lower the heel beneath the forefoot. The calf muscle will only be loaded eccentrically, not concentric. Instead, the non-injured leg is used to get back to the start position. The first set of this exercise is performed in an upright position, followed by a second set with the knee bent to 45°. This regimen is performed 2x per day.

The patients are told to go ahead with the exercise even if they experienced pain. However, they are told to stop if the pain becomes disabling.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of the experience of pain and functionality with the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment questionnaire (VISA-A)
Time Frame: "Week 0", "Week 12"
Change of the experience of pain and functionality as assessed by the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment questionnaire (VISA-A). The VISA-A questionnaire is a validated questionnaire with good test-retest, intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and is especially designed for patients with Achilles tendinopathy. The maximum score that can be achieved on the question is 100, and would be the score of person who is completely asymptomatic. A lower score indicates more symptoms and greater limitation of physical activity.
"Week 0", "Week 12"
Change of the experience of pain at exertion as assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: "Week 4", "Week 12"
Psychometric response scale with continuous aspect (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)). 0 means low ("no pain"), 100 means high (Pain as bad as could possibly be).
"Week 4", "Week 12"
Percentage of participants with an anticipated adverse event of special interest
Time Frame: "Week 4"
Percentage of participants with an anticipated adverse event of special interest (muscle twitching, local warming and initial pain excitement). The occurrence of the expected side-effects is not definitely clear based on literature and pre-clinical investigations.
"Week 4"

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of the experience of pain and functionality with the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment questionnaire (VISA-A)
Time Frame: "Week 0", "Week 2"
Change of the experience of pain and functionality as assessed by the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment questionnaire (VISA-A). The VISA-A questionnaire is a validated questionnaire with good test-retest, intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and is especially designed for patients with Achilles tendinopathy. The maximum score that can be achieved on the question is 100, and would be the score of person who is completely asymptomatic. A lower score indicates more symptoms and greater limitation of physical activity.
"Week 0", "Week 2"
Change of the experience of pain and functionality with the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment questionnaire (VISA-A)
Time Frame: "Week 0", "Week 4"
Change of the experience of pain and functionality as assessed by the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment questionnaire (VISA-A). The VISA-A questionnaire is a validated questionnaire with good test-retest, intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and is especially designed for patients with Achilles tendinopathy. The maximum score that can be achieved on the question is 100, and would be the score of person who is completely asymptomatic. A lower score indicates more symptoms and greater limitation of physical activity.
"Week 0", "Week 4"
Change of the experience of pain and functionality with the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment questionnaire (VISA-A)
Time Frame: "Week 0", "Week 6"
Change of the experience of pain and functionality as assessed by the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment questionnaire (VISA-A). The VISA-A questionnaire is a validated questionnaire with good test-retest, intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and is especially designed for patients with Achilles tendinopathy. The maximum score that can be achieved on the question is 100, and would be the score of person who is completely asymptomatic. A lower score indicates more symptoms and greater limitation of physical activity.
"Week 0", "Week 6"
Change of the experience of pain and functionality with the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment questionnaire (VISA-A)
Time Frame: "Week 0", "Week 8"
Change of the experience of pain and functionality as assessed by the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment questionnaire (VISA-A). The VISA-A questionnaire is a validated questionnaire with good test-retest, intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and is especially designed for patients with Achilles tendinopathy. The maximum score that can be achieved on the question is 100, and would be the score of person who is completely asymptomatic. A lower score indicates more symptoms and greater limitation of physical activity.
"Week 0", "Week 8"
Change of the experience of pain and functionality with the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment questionnaire (VISA-A)
Time Frame: "Week 0", "Week 24"
Change of the experience of pain and functionality as assessed by the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment questionnaire (VISA-A). The VISA-A questionnaire is a validated questionnaire with good test-retest, intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and is especially designed for patients with Achilles tendinopathy. The maximum score that can be achieved on the question is 100, and would be the score of person who is completely asymptomatic. A lower score indicates more symptoms and greater limitation of physical activity.
"Week 0", "Week 24"
Change of the experience of pain at exertion with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: "Week 0", "Week 2"
Psychometric response scale with continuous aspect (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)). 0 means low ("no pain"), 100 means high (Pain as bad as could possibly be).
"Week 0", "Week 2"
Change of the experience of pain at exertion with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: "Week 0", "Week 4"
Psychometric response scale with continuous aspect (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)). 0 means low ("no pain"), 100 means high (Pain as bad as could possibly be).
"Week 0", "Week 4"
Change of the experience of pain at exertion with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: "Week 0", "Week 6"
Psychometric response scale with continuous aspect (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)). 0 means low ("no pain"), 100 means high (Pain as bad as could possibly be).
"Week 0", "Week 6"
Change of the experience of pain at exertion with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: "Week 0", "Week 8"
Psychometric response scale with continuous aspect (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)). 0 means low ("no pain"), 100 means high (Pain as bad as could possibly be).
"Week 0", "Week 8"
Change of the experience of pain at exertion with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: "Week 0", "Week 24"
Psychometric response scale with continuous aspect (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)). 0 means low ("no pain"), 100 means high (Pain as bad as could possibly be).
"Week 0", "Week 24"
Patient Satisfaction: Psychometric response scale with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Time Frame: "Week 0"
Psychometric response scale with continuous aspect (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)). 0 means low ("not satisfied at all"), 100 means high (Satisfaction could not be higher).
"Week 0"
Patient Satisfaction: Psychometric response scale with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Time Frame: "Week 2"
Psychometric response scale with continuous aspect (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)). 0 means low ("not satisfied at all"), 100 means high (Satisfaction could not be higher).
"Week 2"
Patient Satisfaction: Psychometric response scale with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Time Frame: "Week 4"
Psychometric response scale with continuous aspect (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)). 0 means low ("not satisfied at all"), 100 means high (Satisfaction could not be higher).
"Week 4"
Patient Satisfaction: Psychometric response scale with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Time Frame: "Week 6"
Psychometric response scale with continuous aspect (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)). 0 means low ("not satisfied at all"), 100 means high (Satisfaction could not be higher).
"Week 6"
Patient Satisfaction: Psychometric response scale with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Time Frame: "Week 8"
Psychometric response scale with continuous aspect (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)). 0 means low ("not satisfied at all"), 100 means high (Satisfaction could not be higher).
"Week 8"
Patient Satisfaction: Psychometric response scale with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Time Frame: "Week 12"
Psychometric response scale with continuous aspect (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)). 0 means low ("not satisfied at all"), 100 means high (Satisfaction could not be higher).
"Week 12"
Patient Satisfaction: Psychometric response scale with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Time Frame: "Week 24"
Psychometric response scale with continuous aspect (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)). 0 means low ("not satisfied at all"), 100 means high (Satisfaction could not be higher).
"Week 24"
Change of Achilles transverse thickness
Time Frame: "Week 0", "Week 6"
Maximum thickness will be recorded in the midportion of the affected Achilles tendon
"Week 0", "Week 6"
Change of Achilles transverse thickness
Time Frame: "Week 0", "Week 12"
Maximum thickness will be recorded in the midportion of the affected Achilles tendon
"Week 0", "Week 12"
Change of Neovascularization in the Achilles tendon
Time Frame: "Week 0", "Week 4"
Doppler activity measured with real time ultrasonography in a longitudinal and sagittal view.
"Week 0", "Week 4"
Change of Neovascularization in the Achilles tendon
Time Frame: "Week 0", "Week 12"
Doppler activity measured with real time ultrasonography in a longitudinal and sagittal view.
"Week 0", "Week 12"
Usability, graded on a scale from 1 to 5 (1 means low usability, 5 means high usability)
Time Frame: "Week 2"
The usability characteristics contribute to the summative evaluation of the usability of the device under investigation. 1 means low usability, 5 means high usability.
"Week 2"
Usability, graded on a scale from 1 to 5 (1 means low usability, 5 means high usability)
Time Frame: "Week 8"
The usability characteristics contribute to the summative evaluation of the usability of the device under investigation. 1 means low usability, 5 means high usability.
"Week 8"
Usability, graded on a scale from 1 to 5 (1 means low usability, 5 means high usability)
Time Frame: "Week 12"
The usability characteristics contribute to the summative evaluation of the usability of the device under investigation. 1 means low usability, 5 means high usability.
"Week 12"
Percentage of participants with an anticipated adverse event of special interest.
Time Frame: "Week 0"
The percentage of participants with an anticipated adverse event of special interest (muscle twitching, local warming and initial pain excitement). The occurrence of the expected side-effects is not definitely clear based on literature and pre-clinical investigations.
"Week 0"
Percentage of participants with an anticipated adverse event of special interest.
Time Frame: "Week 2"
The percentage of participants with an anticipated adverse event of special interest (muscle twitching, local warming and initial pain excitement). The occurrence of the expected side-effects is not definitely clear based on literature and pre-clinical investigations.
"Week 2"
Percentage of participants with an anticipated adverse event of special interest.
Time Frame: "Week 6"
The percentage of participants with an anticipated adverse event of special interest (muscle twitching, local warming and initial pain excitement). The occurrence of the expected side-effects is not definitely clear based on literature and pre-clinical investigations.
"Week 6"
Percentage of participants with an anticipated adverse event of special interest.
Time Frame: "Week 8"
The percentage of participants with an anticipated adverse event of special interest (muscle twitching, local warming and initial pain excitement). The occurrence of the expected side-effects is not definitely clear based on literature and pre-clinical investigations.
"Week 8"
Percentage of participants with an anticipated adverse event of special interest.
Time Frame: "Week 12"
The percentage of participants with an anticipated adverse event of special interest (muscle twitching, local warming and initial pain excitement). The occurrence of the expected side-effects is not definitely clear based on literature and pre-clinical investigations.
"Week 12"
Percentage of participants with an anticipated adverse event of special interest.
Time Frame: "Week 24"
The percentage of participants with an anticipated adverse event of special interest (muscle twitching, local warming and initial pain excitement). The occurrence of the expected side-effects is not definitely clear based on literature and pre-clinical investigations.
"Week 24"

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

September 4, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 4, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 4, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Achilles Tendinopathy

Clinical Trials on Repetitive pulsed magnetic stimulation

3
Subscribe