Perturbation Training Compared to Balance and Strengthening Exercise, for Elderly at Risk of Falling

January 13, 2020 updated by: Clalit Health Services

The Effectiveness of Perturbation Training With Balance Tutor, Compared to Balance and Strengthening Exercise, on Falls Rate Among Elderly at Risk of Falling

One third of adults over 65 and 50% of adults above 80 years old fall at list once a year. In some cases, falls result in fractures, hospitalization, functional limitations, depression, morbidity and mortality. Strong evidence support exercise training programs for fall prevention, while several studies examined the effect of perturbation training on risk of fall. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a perturbation training program with unexpected perturbation using balance tutor on falls and injuries among elderly at risk of falling, compared to balance and strengthening exercise.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

250

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Be'er Sheva, Israel
      • H̱olon, Israel
      • Nazareth, Israel
        • Recruiting
        • Clalit Healthcare Services
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 85 years (OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:at least one fall during the last 12 months; age 65-85; mini-mental state examination score 24 and above allowing cognitive ability to understand simple instructions ; Time Up and Go (TUG), assessing balance, walking ability and fall risk, scored 13 and above ; ability to read Hebrew or Arabic; and the ability to walk independently 10 meters.

-

Exclusion Criteria:progressive neurological conditions (Parkinson, Multiple sclerosis, CVA); severe orthopedic conditions including lower limb or spine fractures and surgeries in the past 12 months prior to baseline; blindness; Arrhythmia; uncontrolled chronic disease (i.e., hypertension, diabetes, ischemic heart disease); diagnosed severe osteoporosis with a history of fracture during the past 3 years prior to baseline; active cancer during the past three years prior to baseline; lack of availability in the coming two months for completing the treatment protocol

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Perturbation training

Session1 - baseline assessment (detailed above) Session2 - 13 - each session will begin with reassessment and documentation of balance tutor parameters for each participant as were calibrated at the end of previous session.

After reassessment the training program will include:

  • Warm up - walking without perturbation.
  • Perturbation during standing position.
  • Perturbation during walking.
  • Perturbation during tandem position.
  • Perturbation with vestibular stimulation.
  • Rest according to patient needs The relative duration of each component, as well as intensity and frequency of perturbations, will be adjusted to each individual according to his ability, reassessment parameters and progression.

Session14 - full reassessment of all baseline examinations including: Mini-BESTest, ABC scale, PASE, and number of falls.

Balance Tutor system is a unique technology which allows for several postural control ability assessments as well as reactive response training in both standing and walking using controlled perturbation in simple task or multitask performance. Together with proactive training the system allows for optimal rehabilitation outcome and recovery
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Balance and strengthening exercise

Session1 - baseline assessment (detailed above).

Session2 - 13 - each session will include:

  • Warm up (free walking or cycling).
  • Static balance exercise - standing position. Exercise will be performed using different bases of support (narrow, tandem, and one leg stance), eyes open/closed, unstable surfaces, functional and cognitive dual task, and vestibular stimulation.
  • Dynamic balance exercise - walking position. Exercise will be performed using different bases of support (narrow, tandem, and one leg stance), eyes open/closed, unstable surfaces, functional and cognitive dual task, and vestibular stimulation.
  • Strengthening exercise - general strengthening, particularly for lower limb.
  • Cool down. Level of difficulty and duration of each component will be adjusted to each individual according to his ability and progression.

Session14 - full reassessment of all baseline examinations including: Mini-BESTest, ABC scale, PASE, and number of falls.

exercise training programs for fall prevention including walking and balance exercises, functional tasks, strength, flexibility and endurance

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
rate of falls and fallers
Time Frame: falls and fallers rates during 12-months following end of treatment
falls and fallers rates during 12-months following end of treatment
hip fractures and hospitalizations rates due to falls
Time Frame: hip fractures and hospitalizations rates due to falls during12-months following end of treatment
hip fractures and hospitalizations rates due to falls during12-months following end of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mini-BESTest
Time Frame: end of treatment-last visit in physical therapy clinic
Balance assessment according to Balance Evaluation Systems Test. The Mini-BESTest is a 14 item test scored on a 3-level ordinal scale. The total score is 28 while a lower score indicates severe balance impairment
end of treatment-last visit in physical therapy clinic
Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC scale)
Time Frame: 12 months after end of treatment
The ABC scale is a 16-item self-report measure in which patients rate their balance confidence for performing activities. Items are rated on a rating scale that ranges from 0-100; 0 represents "no confidence" and 10 represents "complete confidence".
12 months after end of treatment
Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE)
Time Frame: 12 months after end of treatment
The PASE measures the level of self-reported physical activity in individuals aged 65 years or older and is comprised of items regarding occupational, household, and leisure activities during the previous 7-days period
12 months after end of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shlomit Yaron, MD, Clalit health services

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 25, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 25, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 25, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 14, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • fall prevention BT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fall Prevention

Clinical Trials on Balance Tutor Biofeedback Rehabilitation System

Subscribe