Interactive Posturographic Balance Training Added to Conventional Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke

Effect of Interactive Biofeedback-Based Posturographic Balance Training Added to Conventional Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Stroke frequently leads to long-term balance impairments, increased fall risk, and reduced independence in daily activities. In chronic stroke patients, deficits in sensory integration and postural control may persist despite conventional rehabilitation programs. Additional targeted balance interventions may enhance recovery by improving multisensory processing and motor control.

This study investigates whether adding biofeedback-based interactive posturographic balance training to conventional rehabilitation improves balance performance, fall risk, functional independence, and psychological well-being in individuals with chronic stroke. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either conventional rehabilitation alone or conventional rehabilitation combined with interactive balance training for eight weeks. Outcomes were assessed using validated clinical scales measuring balance, fall risk, daily functioning, and emotional status.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Stroke is a major cause of long-term disability and frequently results in persistent impairments in postural control and balance. In individuals with chronic stroke, altered sensory integration and impaired motor coordination contribute to increased fall risk and reduced functional independence. Although conventional rehabilitation programs address strength, mobility, and functional training, balance deficits may remain due to insufficient multisensory challenge and limited task-specific feedback.

Biofeedback-based interactive posturographic systems provide real-time visual and sensory feedback during standing tasks and systematically challenge postural control under varying sensory conditions. Such interventions may enhance motor learning and promote adaptive sensory reweighting mechanisms by exposing individuals to controlled visual deprivation and head-position alterations.

This prospective, single-blind randomized controlled study was conducted in individuals with chronic stroke (>6 months post-event). Participants were randomly assigned to receive either conventional rehabilitation alone or conventional rehabilitation combined with interactive posturographic balance training. The intervention period lasted eight weeks, with sessions conducted five days per week.

The primary objective of the study was to determine whether adding biofeedback-based interactive posturographic balance training improves clinical balance performance. Secondary objectives included evaluating effects on fall risk, functional independence, and psychological status.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Istanbul
      • Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye), 34147
        • University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 6 months had elapsed since stroke onset
  • They were ambulatory prior to stroke
  • They were able to stand independently for at least 2 minutes
  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥22

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical conditions contraindicating participation in an exercise program
  • Additional disorders affecting balance assessment (vertebrobasilar or peripheral vestibular insufficiency, significant visual impairment, neglect, cognitive impairment, major lower extremity contracture, neuromuscular disease, other neurological pathology, impaired joint position sense)
  • Previous history of stroke
  • Cerebellar involvement (dysmetria, dysdiadochokinesia, ataxia)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Interactive Posturographic Balance Training + Conventional Rehabilitation
Participants received conventional rehabilitation (45 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week) combined with biofeedback-based interactive posturographic balance training (25 minutes per session) for 8 weeks. The balance training was conducted using a multisensory posturographic system providing real-time visual feedback under varying sensory conditions. The conventional rehabilitation program included neurophysiological facilitation techniques, range of motion exercises, strengthening exercises, postural control training, weight-shifting exercises, and gait training.

Intervention Description (Experimental Arm)

Participants received biofeedback-based interactive posturographic balance training using a multisensory platform that provides real-time visual feedback based on vertical pressure fluctuations detected from four force plates under the heels and forefeet. The system systematically challenges postural control under different sensory conditions, including eyes open, eyes closed, unstable surface, and head-position variations. Training sessions lasted 25 minutes, five days per week, for eight weeks and were conducted in addition to a standardized conventional rehabilitation program.

Active Comparator: Conventional Rehabilitation
Participants received conventional rehabilitation only (45 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week) for 8 weeks. The program consisted of neurophysiological facilitation techniques, range of motion exercises, strengthening exercises, postural control training, weight-shifting exercises, and gait training.
Participants received a standardized conventional rehabilitation program consisting of neurophysiological facilitation techniques, range of motion exercises, muscle strengthening exercises, postural control training, weight-shifting exercises, and gait training. Sessions lasted 45 minutes per day, five days per week, for eight weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 weeks
The Berg Balance Scale is a 14-item clinical measure of balance performance scored from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating better balance.
Baseline and 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Barthel Index score from baseline to 8 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 weeks
The Barthel Index assesses functional independence in activities of daily living and ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater independence.
Baseline and 8 weeks
Change in Fall Risk Index from baseline to 8 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 weeks
The Fall Risk Index is derived from computerized posturographic assessment and reflects the estimated percentage risk of falling. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater fall risk.
Baseline and 8 weeks
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) total score from baseline to 8 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 weeks
The HADS is a 14-item questionnaire assessing anxiety and depression symptoms. Total scores range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater psychological distress.
Baseline and 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared due to institutional data protection regulations and ethical considerations.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Biofeedback-Based Interactive Posturographic Balance Training

Subscribe