Y90 Radiation Segmentectomy vs SBRT for HCC (SBRT vs Y90)

October 23, 2023 updated by: Paul Haste, Indiana University

Yttrium-90 Radiation Segmentectomy Versus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for the Treatment of Early Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): A Pilot Study

The proposed study is a single site, prospective, randomized pilot study to assess the feasibility of recruitment of patients into a trial evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of selective transarterial Y90 radioembolization (radiation segmentectomy) versus stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for solitary early stage (≤ 3cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Indiana University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ability to provide written informed consent and HIPAA authorization
  • Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  • Male or female, aged ≥ 18 years at time of informed consent
  • Solitary HCC (≤3 cm) diagnosed by imaging (LI-RADS 4-5) or histology
  • Childs-Pugh score ≤ 7
  • ECOG performance status 0-1
  • Tumor location/characteristics eligible for either SBRT or Y90 therapy as deemed by local tumor board
  • Adequate organ function defined as:

    1. serum bilirubin < 4.0 mg/dL ,
    2. albumin > 2 g/dL

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any prior locoregional therapy to the target tumor
  • Any prior radiation therapy to the liver
  • Pregnancy or lactation: Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 14 days of protocol registration. Women are considered to have childbearing potential (regardless of sexual orientation, having undergone a tubal ligation, or remaining celibate by choice) unless they meet one of the following criteria:

    i. Has undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy; or ii. Has been naturally amenorrheic for at least 24 consecutive months

  • Known severe allergic reaction (anaphylaxis) to iodinated contrast
  • Coagulopathy (platelets < 50 K/mm3 and/or INR > 2) not correctable by transfusion
  • Macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic HCC

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Yttrium-90 Radiation Segmentectomy
This therapy arm involves two separate steps, a planning/mapping arteriogram and a therapy delivery. The planning arteriogram will be performed to confirm arterial anatomy is acceptable for RS (≤2 segment delivery) and that lung shunting is not too high to preclude treatment with RS. Once confirmed, patients will return for RS (within 45 days of mapping). Dose will be calculated based off the desired treatment volume using pre-treatment cross-sectional imaging. The desired segmental dose will be calculated to be ≥ 200Gy. RS will be performed by one of three separate interventional radiologists with experience in radioembolization. Actual administered activity and location of dose administration will be recorded.
Active Comparator: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
SBRT will be delivered with linear accelerator-based photon beams with either fixed angle non- coplanar fields or dynamic arcs. An internal target volume (ITV) will be generated to account for tumor movement during breathing cycle. Finally, a planning target volume (PTV) will be an expansion of 3- 5mm from the ITV. For Child Pugh A patients, prescription dose will either be 5000cGy in 5 fractions delivered every other day or 4800cGy in 3 fractions delivered twice weekly. For Child Pugh B patients, prescription dose of 4000cGy in 5 fractions delivered every other day. Inverse planning will be used. 95% of the PTV or more will receive at least 100% of the prescription dose. Normal tissue dose constraints for each dose level will be respected with acceptable deviations permitted as outlined in appendix VII. Patients will be seen at least once per week by a clinician to grade toxicities, with on- treatment labs (CBC, CMP, INR) each week.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of Recruitment (Recruitment Rate)
Time Frame: 24 months
Feasibility of recruitment will be measured by evaluating the proportion of patients enrolled versus those approached for the study after they have been determined to be a candidate.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Patients With Any Toxicities
Time Frame: 16 months for the first subject and 4 months for the second
the proportion of patients with any toxicities (≥ grade 4) using CTCAE between RS and SBRT for patients with small (≤3 cm) solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
16 months for the first subject and 4 months for the second
Mean Change in Hepatobiliary Function
Time Frame: 16 months for the first subject and 4 months for the second
the mean change in hepatobiliary function, as measured 3 months after treatment using a functional HIDA scan, between RS and SBRT for patients with small (≤3 cm) solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
16 months for the first subject and 4 months for the second
Mean Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- General (FACT-G) Score
Time Frame: 6 months
the mean change in patient-reported outcomes from baseline, at 1, 3 and 6 months, between RS and SBRT, for patients with small (≤3 cm) solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- General (FACT-G). scale goes from 0-108 with a higher score being better.
6 months
Mean Change in Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity
Time Frame: 6 months
the mean change in patient-reported outcomes from baseline, at 1, 3 and 6 months, between RS and SBRT, for patients with small (≤3 cm) solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST). scale is from 0-44 with higher being bettter
6 months
Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rates of RS and SBRT
Time Frame: 16 months for the first subject and 4 months for the second
the disease-free survival (DFS) rates of RS and SBRT at 2 years using mRECIST on CT or MR for patients with small (≤3 cm) solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
16 months for the first subject and 4 months for the second
Time-to-secondary Treatment (TTST) Between RS and SBRT
Time Frame: 16 months for the first subject and 4 months for the second
time-to-secondary treatment (TTST) between RS and SBRT for patients with small (≤3 cm) solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) up to 2 years after initial treatment.
16 months for the first subject and 4 months for the second
Objective Response Rate
Time Frame: 6 months
the objective response rate (ORR) of radiation segmentectomy (RS) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as measured at 6 months using mRECIST (appendix IV) for patients with small (≤3 cm) solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to better allow for an appropriately powered trial evaluating the efficacy of these treatments.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 22, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 8, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 8, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

Clinical Trials on Yttrium-90 Radiation Segmentectomy

Subscribe