The Effect of Heating on Thermal Comfort and Anxiety

January 27, 2020 updated by: Tunc Tuna Pinar, PhD, Selcuk University

The Effect of Active and Passive Heating Methods Used in Different Areas of Perioperative Processes on Thermal Comfort and Anxiety

This study with a randomized, pretest - posttest controlled experimental design was conducted to determine the effects of active and passive heating methods applied in different parts of the perioperative process on thermal comfort, anxiety and vital signs. The study was conducted with the patients who were hospitalized for open abdominal surgical interventions in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, of Selcuk University Medical Faculty Hospital, between the dates of 1 October 2018 and 10 January 2019. The study included 99 patients in two control groups and one experimental group. The patients in group A were dressed with hot air blowing patients scrubs in both preoperative and postoperative periods, while patients in group B were dressed with hot air blowing patients scrubs only in the postoperative period. The control group continued routine practice. In the preoperative period, vital signs, thermal comfort, and anxiety levels of the patients were evaluated. In the intraoperative period, vital signs and thermal comfort levels of the patients were evaluated. Thermal comfort level of the patients was re-evaluated prior to the induction of anesthesia. Once the patients were transferred to the post-anesthesia care unit, among the vital signs of the patients, body temperature was measured in the temporal region, and other signs were measured using the monitors. Thermal comfort and anxiety levels of the patients were re-evaluated after they got dressed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

"Perioperative hypothermia," which is defined as a decrease below 36 °C in the body temperature 1 h prior to anesthesia and up to 24 h following anesthesia is a common problem in patients undergoing surgery. Perioperative hypothermia leads to many problems.

Given the negative effects of increased anxiety and deterioration in thermal comfort due to perioperative hypothermia (such as decreased satisfaction and increased pain) hypothermia poses a problem that should be highlighted and prevented. It is also important for nurses to understand hypothermia and the complications associated with it and take effective measures. In the present randomized controlled trials, gowns blowing warm air; heated blankets, fabrics, and liquid; and self-heating blankets were used for increasing thermal comfort. No common heating technique or heating area was used in these studies In this context, the primary purpose of the present study was to determine the effects of active (gown blowing warm air) and passive (heated blanket) heating on thermal comfort and anxiety in preoperative and postoperative periods in patients scheduled for open abdominal surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Konya, Turkey, 42550
        • Selcuk Universty

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being scheduled for open abdominal surgery
  • Being an inpatient in the obstetrics and gynecology ward
  • 2-4 h surgery duration
  • 1 and 2 ASA scores
  • Being able to speak Turkish
  • Being 18-65 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mental retardation and psychiatric disorder,
  • The presence of severe lesions or wounds on the skin
  • Being an alcohol and drug addict

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group C

Usual care (Group C): The patients in this group received routine hospital care.

Vital signs, thermal comfort, and anxiety levels of the patients were evaluated.

routine hospital care
Experimental: Group A

The patients in Group A were warmed up using a gown blowing warm air starting at least 30 min prior to the surgery until they were anesthetized.

Vital signs, thermal comfort, and anxiety levels of the patients were evaluated.

This study is a randomized, pretest - posttest controlled experimental design.
Other Names:
  • Thermal Comfort Scale
  • Anxiety Scale
Experimental: Group B

Routine care was provided for the patients in Group B in the preoperative and intraoperative periods. In the postoperative period, patients were warmed up using a gown blowing warm air after they were transferred to the post-anesthesia care unit, and continued to be warmed up on the basis of the temperature set by themselves until they wore their own clothes in the ward.

Vital signs, thermal comfort, and anxiety levels of the patients were evaluated.

routine hospital care
This study is a randomized, pretest - posttest controlled experimental design.
Other Names:
  • Thermal Comfort Scale
  • Anxiety Scale

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Thermal comfort
Time Frame: baseline (at the beginning of treatment)
Thermal comfort level was measured using a 10-cm visual analog scale, The patients were explained that 1 point indicated "no comfort" and 10 points indicated "the highest level of comfort," and then they were asked to give 1-10 points for their comfort levels.
baseline (at the beginning of treatment)
Anxiety
Time Frame: baseline (at the beginning of treatment)
The state-trait anxiety inventory developed by Spielberger et al. (1970) was used to measure the anxiety levels of the patients. The state anxiety inventory evaluates "how one feels at a certain moment and under certain conditions," whereas the continuous anxiety inventory evaluates "how one feels irrespective of the circumstances and conditions that he or she is in." A high score is an indicator of high anxiety level
baseline (at the beginning of treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Body temperatures
Time Frame: baseline (at the beginning of treatment)
In the evaluation of life findings of patients in the perioperative period; ARMOLINE contactless electronic infrared thermometer was used for fire. (degrees centigrade)
baseline (at the beginning of treatment)
blood pressure values
Time Frame: baseline (at the beginning of treatment)
In the evaluation of life findings of patients in the perioperative period; GAMMA brand sphygmomanometer was used for blood pressure. (mm Hg)
baseline (at the beginning of treatment)
pulse values
Time Frame: baseline (at the beginning of treatment)
In the evaluation of life findings of patients in the perioperative period; plusMED -50DL finger-type pulse oximeter was used to measure saturation. (beats per minute)
baseline (at the beginning of treatment)
respiratory rates
Time Frame: baseline (at the beginning of treatment)
the respiratory rate was counted for one minute. (beats per minute)
baseline (at the beginning of treatment)
saturation values
Time Frame: baseline (at the beginning of treatment)
In the evaluation of life findings of patients in the perioperative period; plusMED -50DL finger-type pulse oximeter was used to measure saturation. (PO2)
baseline (at the beginning of treatment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Pinar Tunc Tuna, Selcuk Universty
  • Study Director: Serife Kursun, Selcuk Universty
  • Study Director: Inci Kara, Selcuk Universty

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 30, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 10, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Selcuk

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on routine hospital care

3
Subscribe