Multicentre Study: Adherence to the Severe Trauma Patients Pathway in PACA Region (FILTRAUMA-PACA)

Trauma patient management concerns more than 140,000 patients per year in France. PACA Regional Emergency Observatory (ORU) has issued recommendations to optimize the management of these trauma patients from pre-hospital phase to hospitalization first hours. Ideally, pre-hospital care should not exceed 60 minutes, from accident (first call to the SAMU) to trauma center arrival: the "golden hour" concept. Patients presenting at least one of the Vittel criteria are considered as severely traumatized and are classified according to 3 states of seriousness: unstable, critical and potentially serious. They are referred to trauma centers whose classification is based on their technical facilities, ranging from level 1 (maximum technical facilities) to level 3 (minimum technical facilities). Patients are referred according to their severity, distance from accident site, referral center and availability of each site. Initial hospital management recommends a whole body CT scan within 45 minutes for patients categorized as unstable or critical by pre-hospital doctor and 90 minutes for patients deemed potentially serious.

FILTRAUMA PACA study will analyze the impact of the different management sequences of severe trauma patients based on reliable temporal data because it is automatically incremented in databases and will seek to find a correlation with patient outcome (survival at 24 hours and 28 days).

The main hypothesis tested is that PACA ORU recommended delay respect during trauma patient initial management is correlated with vital prognosis in short (24 hours) and medium terms (28 days).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Trauma patient management concerns more than 140,000 patients per year in France. Grenoble region was the first one to organize its trauma network around trauma centers ranked by levels (from level 1, the most complete technical platform, to level 3). PACA Regional Health Agency (ARS) set up its dedicated line for severe trauma patients in 2014 based on a regional multi-professional group recommendations, the PACA Regional Emergency Observatory (ORU), in order to optimize the management of these trauma patients from pre-hospital phase to hospitalization first hours (recommendations available online: https://ies-sud.fr/bonnes-pratiques/).

This network suggests a care pathway setting objectives at each stage with operating requirements. Ideally, pre-hospital care should not exceed 60 minutes, from accident (first call to the SAMU) to trauma center arrival: the "golden hour" concept. Patients presenting at least one of the Vittel criteria are considered as severely traumatized and are classified according to 3 states of seriousness: unstable, critical and potentially serious. They are referred to trauma centers whose classification is based on their technical facilities, ranging from level 1 (maximum technical facilities) to level 3 (minimum technical facilities). In PACA region, level 1 technical platforms are North Hospital and Timone Hospital (AP-HM, Marseille, 13) and Sainte Anne Hospital (Toulon, 83). Levels 2 are Sainte Musse Hospital (Toulon, 83), Saint Joseph Hospital (Marseille, 13) and Avignon Hospital (84) and levels 3 correspond to all other hospitals in the region. Patients are referred according to their severity, distance from accident site, referral center and availability of each site. Initial hospital management recommends a whole body CT scan within 45 minutes for patients categorized as unstable or critical by the pre-hospital doctor and 90 minutes for patients deemed potentially serious.

FILTRAUMA PACA study will analyze the impact of the different management sequences of severe trauma patients based on reliable temporal data because it is automatically incremented in databases and will seek to find a correlation with patient outcome (survival at 24 hours and 28 days). The main hypothesis tested is that PACA ORU recommended delay respect during trauma patient initial management is correlated with vital prognosis in short (24 hours) and medium terms (28 days).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

265

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alpes-de-Haute-Provence
      • Digne-les-Bains, Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France, 04995
        • Centre Hospitalier de Digne les Bains
    • Var
      • Toulon, Var, France, 83056
        • Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Toulon La Seyne sur Mer
    • Vaucluse
      • Avignon, Vaucluse, France, 84000
        • Centre Hospitalier d'Avignon Henri Duffaut

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patient with a severe trauma requiring SMUR activation

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Any patient with a severe trauma requiring SMUR activation. Trauma defined by the appearance of a lesion following a fall, a road accident, a burn or the penetration of a foreign body and regulated by one of the PACA region SAMU centres (84, 83, 13, 04)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Opposition of the patient, family member or trusted person
  • Patient under legal protection (guardianship or curatorship)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Adult patient with a severe trauma requiring SMUR activation
Trauma defined by appearance of lesions following a fall, a road accident, a burn or the penetration of a foreign body and regulated by one of the SAMU PACA region centres (84, 83, 13, 04)
Pre-hospital care not exceeding 60 min and a whole body CT scan within 45 min for patients categorized as unstable or critical by the pre-hospital doctor and 90 minutes for patients deemed potentially serious.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate whether compliance with the "golden hour", pre-hospital delay recommended by PACA ORU, influences severe trauma patient vital status.
Time Frame: 24 hours
Pre-hospital management duration (from the call to the SAMU to arrival at trauma centres) will be derived according to PACA ORU recommendation (time inferior or superior to 1 hour), and will then be related to patient's vital status at 24 hours.
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate whether adherence to ORU PACA recommendations in terms of pre-hospital management delays influences severe trauma patient vital status at day 28
Time Frame: 28 days
Pre-hospital management duration (from the call to the SAMU to arrival at trauma centres) will be derived according to PACA ORU recommendation (inferior or superior 1 hour), and will then be related to patient's vital status at day 28.
28 days
To assess whether transport by suitable vehicle to appropriate health facility recommended by the ORU PACA influences the vital status of severe trauma patients.
Time Frame: 28 days
The influence of adherence to ORU PACA recommendations on severe trauma patient vital status (at 24 hours and 28 days after trauma) will be evaluated according to transport by suitable vehicle to appropriate health facility
28 days
To assess whether accident categorization and assessment transfer to the SAMU recommended by the ORU PACA influences the vital status of severe trauma patients.
Time Frame: 28 days
The influence of adherence to ORU PACA recommendations on severe trauma patient vital status (at 24 hours and 28 days after trauma) will be evaluated according to accident categorization and assessment transfer to the SAMU
28 days
To assess whether management on accident scene recommended by the ORU PACA influences the vital status of severe trauma patients.
Time Frame: 28 days
The influence of adherence to ORU PACA recommendations on severe trauma patient vital status (at 24 hours and 28 days after trauma) will be evaluated according to management on accident scene
28 days
To assess whether overall assessment of severity recommended by the ORU PACA influences the vital status of severe trauma patients.
Time Frame: 28 days
The influence of adherence to ORU PACA recommendations on severe trauma patient vital status (at 24 hours and 28 days after trauma) will be evaluated according to Overall assessment of severity.
28 days
To assess whether time required to perform a whole body CT scan recommended by the ORU PACA influences the vital status of severe trauma patients.
Time Frame: 28 days
The influence of adherence to ORU PACA recommendations on severe trauma patient vital status (at 24 hours and 28 days after trauma) will be evaluated according to time required to perform a whole body CT scan.
28 days
To analyze risk factors for non-adherence to recommendations
Time Frame: 28 days
The risk factors for non-adherence to recommendations will be identified through primary and first secondary outcome criteria analysis. They will then be described (structural, patient-related).
28 days
To analyze errors in referring severe trauma patients to an appropriate care facility
Time Frame: 28 days
Identification and analysis of the reasons for mis-referrals of severe trauma patients to an approved care facility.
28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Marc FOURNIER, MD, PhD, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Toulon La Seyne sur Mer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 23, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 20, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

June 20, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021-CHITS-013

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trauma

Clinical Trials on Pre-hospital and hospital care

Subscribe