- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04251819
Buprenorphine Plus Baclofen to Increase Analgesia in Healthy Volunteers
December 16, 2025 updated by: Karen Cropsey, University of Alabama at Birmingham
To determine if baclofen will enhance buprenorphine analgesia for acute pain in healthy volunteers.
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Abuse of opioids is a significant and growing problem in the United States.
In the past two decades, opioid prescriptions have quadrupled while the age of heroin initiation has decreased, suggesting that more individuals are using opioids and transitioning to heroin and potent synthetic opioids than in the past.
Further, fatal opioid overdose is now the leading cause of accidental death and is the 5th highest overall cause of mortality in the US.
Engaging opioid users in opioid agonist treatments has been shown to lower rates of criminal behavior, lower rates of non-opioid drug use, and increase retention in drug treatment programs, while decreasing mortality and new HIV and hepatitis infections.
However, a recent study noted that 68% of patients prescribed buprenorphine had poor medication adherence, which was associated with illicit opioid use.
A Cochrane review concluded that buprenorphine was less effective at retaining patients in treatment relative to methadone.
One reason for lower treatment retention may be the high comorbidity of opioid use disorder and chronic pain and/or opioid-induced hyperalgesia.
Buprenorphine, as a partial mu agonist, provides lower analgesia but an improved safety profile relative to full agonists like methadone.
Thus, enhancing the analgesic properties of buprenorphine will provide a safer alternative for opioid use disorder patients with chronic pain/hyperalgesia.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
19
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35209
- University of Alabama, Birmingham
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years or older
- general good health
- English speaking
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant or nursing
- Opioid use disorder or any substance use disorder other than nicotine
- Prescribed agonist treatment for opioid dependence or prescribed opioids for a medical condition
- Prescribed naltrexone
- Known sensitivity to buprenorphine, naloxone, or baclofen
- Acute or chronic pain condition
- Trouble breathing or a pulmonary condition
- Prescribed benzodiazepines or daily use of benzodiazepines
- Positive drug screen (positive cannabis result allowed)
- Cognitive impairment or psychiatric disorder requiring treatment
- Uncontrolled hypertension
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants randomized to this arm will receive one dosage of Placebo as part of their second study appointment.
|
Participants will receive placebo in combination with 0.3 mg of buprenorphine to examine analgesia in acute pain tasks.
|
|
Experimental: Baclofen 5mg
Participants randomized to this arm will receive one dosage of 5 mg of Baclofen as part of their second study appointment.
|
Participants will receive 5mg of baclofen in combination with 0.3 mg of buprenorphine to examine analgesia in acute pain tasks.
|
|
Experimental: Baclofen 10mg
Participants randomized to this arm will receive one dosage of 10 mg of Baclofen as part of their second study appointment.
|
Participants will receive 10mg of baclofen in combination with 0.3 mg of buprenorphine to examine analgesia in acute pain tasks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Threshold
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Pain threshold refers to the intensity at which a stimulus is first perceived as painful.
Heat stimuli will be delivered using a computer-controlled thermal stimulation system with a 30 millimeter X 30 millimeter probe.
From a baseline of 32 degrees Celsius, the probe temperature will increase at a rate of .5 degrees Celsius/second until the participant responds by pressing a button on a handheld device.
For heat pain threshold, participants will be instructed to press the button when the sensation "first becomes painful" Pain rating scores will be reflected in scores of 0-100, 0 being the least amount of pain and 100 being the most amount of pain.
|
Baseline
|
|
Pain Threshold
Time Frame: 1.5 hours post-drug administration during session 2, occurs 7 ± 2 days after baseline visit
|
Pain threshold refers to the intensity at which a stimulus is first perceived as painful.
Heat stimuli will be delivered using a computer-controlled thermal stimulation system with a 30 millimeter X 30 millimeter probe.
From a baseline of 32 degrees Celsius, the probe temperature will increase at a rate of .5 degrees Celsius/second until the participant responds by pressing a button on a handheld device.
For heat pain threshold, participants will be instructed to press the button when the sensation "first becomes painful" Pain rating scores will be reflected in scores of 0-100, 0 being the least amount of pain and 100 being the most amount of pain.
|
1.5 hours post-drug administration during session 2, occurs 7 ± 2 days after baseline visit
|
|
Pain Tolerance
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Pain tolerance refers to the maximum amount of pain produced by a stimulus that a person is able/willing to tolerate.
Heat stimuli will again be delivered using the computer-controlled thermal stimulation system.
From a baseline of 32 degrees Celsius, the probe temperature will increase at a rate of .5 degrees Celsius/second until the participant responds by pressing a button on a handheld device.
For heat pain tolerance, participants will be instructed to press the button when they are "no longer willing to tolerate" the painful sensation.
Pain rating scores will be reflected in scores of 0-100, 0 being the least amount of pain and 100 being the most amount of pain.
|
Baseline
|
|
Pain Tolerance
Time Frame: 1.5 hours post-drug administration during session 2, occurs 7 ± 2 days after baseline visit
|
Pain tolerance refers to the maximum amount of pain produced by a stimulus that a person is able/willing to tolerate.
Heat stimuli will again be delivered using the computer-controlled thermal stimulation system.
From a baseline of 32 degrees Celsius, the probe temperature will increase at a rate of .5 degrees Celsius/second until the participant responds by pressing a button on a handheld device.
For heat pain tolerance, participants will be instructed to press the button when they are "no longer willing to tolerate" the painful sensation.
Pain rating scores will be reflected in scores of 0-100, 0 being the least amount of pain and 100 being the most amount of pain.
|
1.5 hours post-drug administration during session 2, occurs 7 ± 2 days after baseline visit
|
|
Temporal Summation of Pain
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Temporal summation of pain refers to a form of endogenous pain facilitation characterized by the perception of increased pain despite constant or even reduced peripheral afferent input.
Temporal summation is presumed to be the psychophysical manifestation of wind-up.
Wind-up is a phenomenon where repetitive stimulation of C primary afferents at rates greater than 0.3 Hertz produces a slowly increasing response of second-order neurons in the spinal cord.
Pain rating scores will be reflected in scores of 0-100, 0 being the least amount of pain and 100 being the most amount of pain.
|
Baseline
|
|
Temporal Summation of Pain
Time Frame: 1.5 hours post-drug administration during session 2, occurs 7 ± 2 days after baseline visit
|
Temporal summation of pain refers to a form of endogenous pain facilitation characterized by the perception of increased pain despite constant or even reduced peripheral afferent input.
Temporal summation is presumed to be the psychophysical manifestation of wind-up.
Wind-up is a phenomenon where repetitive stimulation of C primary afferents at rates greater than 0.3 Hertz produces a slowly increasing response of second-order neurons in the spinal cord.
Pain rating scores will be reflected in scores of 0-100, 0 being the least amount of pain and 100 being the most amount of pain.
|
1.5 hours post-drug administration during session 2, occurs 7 ± 2 days after baseline visit
|
|
Conditioned Pain Modulation
Time Frame: Baseline
|
A routinely used quantitative sensory testing protocol for the measurement of endogenous pain inhibition is conditioned pain modulation, which refers to the reduction in pain from one stimulus (the test stimulus) produced by the application of a second pain stimulus at a remote body site (the conditioning stimulus).
Conditioned pain modulation is believed to reflect the perceptual manifestation of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls, whereby ascending projections from one noxious stimulus activate supraspinal structures that trigger descending inhibitory projections to the dorsal horn.
Pain rating scores for the test stimulus and the conditioning stimulus will be reflected in scores of 0-100, 0 being the least amount of pain and 100 being the most amount of pain.
The conditioned pain modulation score is the difference between the two pain rating scores.
|
Baseline
|
|
Conditioned Pain Modulation
Time Frame: 1.5 hours post-drug administration during session 2, occurs 7 ± 2 days after baseline visit
|
A routinely used quantitative sensory testing protocol for the measurement of endogenous pain inhibition is conditioned pain modulation, which refers to the reduction in pain from one stimulus (the test stimulus) produced by the application of a second pain stimulus at a remote body site (the conditioning stimulus).
Conditioned pain modulation is believed to reflect the perceptual manifestation of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls, whereby ascending projections from one noxious stimulus activate supraspinal structures that trigger descending inhibitory projections to the dorsal horn.
Pain rating scores for the test stimulus and the conditioning stimulus will be reflected in scores of 0-100, 0 being the least amount of pain and 100 being the most amount of pain.
The conditioned pain modulation score is the difference between the two pain rating scores.
|
1.5 hours post-drug administration during session 2, occurs 7 ± 2 days after baseline visit
|
|
Suprathreshold Pain Response
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Ratings of pain in response to discrete stimuli with intensities above the pain threshold detection/ patients provide an intensity rating using any number of a 0-100 scale whereby 0=no pain and 100= the most intense pain imaginable
|
Baseline
|
|
Suprathreshold Pain Response
Time Frame: 1.5 hours post-drug administration during session 2, occurs 7 ± 2 days after baseline visit
|
Ratings of pain in response to discrete stimuli with intensities above the pain threshold detection/ patients provide an intensity rating using any number of a 0-100 scale whereby 0=no pain and 100= the most intense pain imaginable
|
1.5 hours post-drug administration during session 2, occurs 7 ± 2 days after baseline visit
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Opioid Symptom Checklist
Time Frame: 30 minutes post-drug administration during session 2, occurs 7 ± 2 days after baseline visit
|
Measures the amount and intensity of side effects after being administered an opioid.
The measure consists of 14 questions about potential opioid symptoms, and each the severity of the symptom is rated on a scale from 0 to 4, with 0 reflecting not at all feeling or being bothered by the symptom and 4 reflecting being severely bothered by the symptom.
The score is the sum of the 14 responses.
The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 56.
|
30 minutes post-drug administration during session 2, occurs 7 ± 2 days after baseline visit
|
|
26-item Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 30 minutes post-drug administration during session 2, occurs 7 ± 2 days after baseline visit
|
Measures subjective and physiological effects of a medication using mood states as well as questions about the dose of medication.
The measure consists of 7 questions about potential drug effects, and each response is rated on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 reflecting not at all feeling the effect and 100 reflecting very much feeling the effect.
The score is the sum of the 7 responses.
The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 700.
|
30 minutes post-drug administration during session 2, occurs 7 ± 2 days after baseline visit
|
|
Drug Effects Questionnaire-5
Time Frame: 30 minutes post-drug administration during session 2, occurs 7 ± 2 days after baseline visit
|
Measures subjective experiences of a drug.
The measure consists of 5 questions about the participant's experience of the drug effects, and each response is rated on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 reflecting not at all having an experience and 100 reflecting extremely having that experience.
The score is the sum of the 5 responses.
The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 500.
|
30 minutes post-drug administration during session 2, occurs 7 ± 2 days after baseline visit
|
|
26-item Visual Analog Scale ("Subjective Drug Effects")
Time Frame: 30 minutes post-drug administration during session 2, occurs 7 ± 2 days after baseline visit
|
This 26-item VAS measures subjective and physiological effects of a medication using mood states as well as questions about the dose of medication.
The measure consists of 7 questions about potential drug effects, and each response is rated on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 reflecting not at all feeling the effect and 100 reflecting very much feeling the effect.
The score is the sum of the 7 responses.
The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 700.
|
30 minutes post-drug administration during session 2, occurs 7 ± 2 days after baseline visit
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Karen L Cropsey, Psy.D., University of Alabama at Birmingham
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 21, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 15, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
June 15, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 29, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
February 5, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
January 7, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 16, 2025
Last Verified
October 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 300004505
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Analgesia
-
University Hospital, CaenNot yet recruitingPostoperative Care | Postoperative Analgesia | Analgesia Assessment | PosthectomyFrance
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalEnrolling by invitationEpidural Analgesia | Learning Curve | Epidural Analgesia for Labour and DeliveryUnited States
-
Dr. John A. Thiel Medical Professional CorporationNot yet recruiting
-
Tanta UniversityRecruiting
-
SSM Health Bone and Joint Hospital at St AnthonyRecruitingAnalgesiaUnited States
-
Makassed General HospitalRecruiting
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesCompleted
-
Abd-Elazeem Abd-Elhameed ElbakryActive, not recruiting
Clinical Trials on Placebos
-
Yiling Pharmaceutical Inc.Completed
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityRecruiting
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterTerminated
-
Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.CompletedBipolar Depression | Major Depressive DisorderUnited States, Bulgaria, Russian Federation, Serbia, Ukraine
-
AmgenCTI Clinical Trial and Consulting ServicesTerminated
-
Josef Smolen, Univ. Prof. Dr.Unknown
-
GE HealthcareSyneos HealthTerminatedChronic Kidney DiseasesUnited States, Spain, Belgium, Canada, Poland, United Kingdom
-
Nanjing Sanhome Pharmaceutical, Co., Ltd.Completed
-
Shengjing HospitalCompleted
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreStanford UniversityWithdrawnHeart Failure NYHA Class IV