Buprenorphine Plus Baclofen to Increase Analgesia in Healthy Volunteers

December 20, 2023 updated by: Karen Cropsey, University of Alabama at Birmingham
To determine if baclofen will enhance buprenorphine analgesia for acute pain in healthy volunteers.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Abuse of opioids is a significant and growing problem in the United States. In the past two decades, opioid prescriptions have quadrupled while the age of heroin initiation has decreased, suggesting that more individuals are using opioids and transitioning to heroin and potent synthetic opioids than in the past. Further, fatal opioid overdose is now the leading cause of accidental death and is the 5th highest overall cause of mortality in the US. Engaging opioid users in opioid agonist treatments has been shown to lower rates of criminal behavior, lower rates of non-opioid drug use, and increase retention in drug treatment programs, while decreasing mortality and new HIV and hepatitis infections. However, a recent study noted that 68% of patients prescribed buprenorphine had poor medication adherence, which was associated with illicit opioid use. A Cochrane review concluded that buprenorphine was less effective at retaining patients in treatment relative to methadone. One reason for lower treatment retention may be the high comorbidity of opioid use disorder and chronic pain and/or opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Buprenorphine, as a partial mu agonist, provides lower analgesia but an improved safety profile relative to full agonists like methadone. Thus, enhancing the analgesic properties of buprenorphine will provide a safer alternative for opioid use disorder patients with chronic pain/hyperalgesia.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Karen L Cropsey, Psy.D.
  • Phone Number: 2059754204
  • Email: kcropsey@uab.edu

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Keith Chichester, B.A.
  • Phone Number: 2059757809
  • Email: krc80@uab.edu

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35209
        • University of Alabama, Birmingham

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • general good health
  • English speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or nursing
  • Opioid use disorder or any substance use disorder other than nicotine
  • Prescribed agonist treatment for opioid dependence or prescribed opioids for a medical condition
  • Prescribed naltrexone
  • Known sensitivity to buprenorphine, naloxone, or baclofen
  • Acute or chronic pain condition
  • Trouble breathing or a pulmonary condition
  • Prescribed benzodiazepines or daily use of benzodiazepines
  • Positive drug screen (positive cannabis result allowed)
  • Cognitive impairment or psychiatric disorder requiring treatment
  • Uncontrolled hypertension

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants randomized to this arm will receive Placebo.
Participants will receive placebo in combination with 0.3 mg of buprenorphine to examine analgesia in acute pain tasks.
Experimental: Baclofen 5mg
Participants randomized to this arm will receive 5 mg of Baclofen.
Participants will receive 5mg of baclofen in combination with 0.3 mg of buprenorphine to examine analgesia in acute pain tasks.
Experimental: Baclofen 10mg
Participants randomized to this arm will receive 10 mg of Baclofen.
Participants will receive 10mg of baclofen in combination with 0.3 mg of buprenorphine to examine analgesia in acute pain tasks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Threshold
Time Frame: Baseline
Pain threshold refers to the intensity at which a stimulus is first perceived as painful. Heat stimuli will be delivered using a computer-controlled thermal stimulation system with a 30 millimeter X 30 millimeter probe. From a baseline of 32 degrees Celsius, the probe temperature will increase at a rate of .5 degrees Celsius/second until the participant responds by pressing a button on a handheld device. For heat pain threshold, participants will be instructed to press the button when the sensation "first becomes painful" Pain rating scores will be reflected in scores of 0-100, 0 being the least amount of pain and 100 being the most amount of pain.
Baseline
Pain Threshold
Time Frame: Baseline through one week
Pain threshold refers to the intensity at which a stimulus is first perceived as painful. Heat stimuli will be delivered using a computer-controlled thermal stimulation system with a 30 millimeter X 30 millimeter probe. From a baseline of 32 degrees Celsius, the probe temperature will increase at a rate of .5 degrees Celsius/second until the participant responds by pressing a button on a handheld device. For heat pain threshold, participants will be instructed to press the button when the sensation "first becomes painful" Pain rating scores will be reflected in scores of 0-100, 0 being the least amount of pain and 100 being the most amount of pain.
Baseline through one week
Pain tolerance
Time Frame: Baseline
Pain tolerance refers to the maximum amount of pain produced by a stimulus that a person is able/willing to tolerate. Heat stimuli will again be delivered using the computer-controlled thermal stimulation system. From a baseline of 32 degrees Celsius, the probe temperature will increase at a rate of .5 degrees Celsius/second until the participant responds by pressing a button on a handheld device. For heat pain tolerance, participants will be instructed to press the button when they are "no longer willing to tolerate" the painful sensation. Pain rating scores will be reflected in scores of 0-100, 0 being the least amount of pain and 100 being the most amount of pain.
Baseline
Pain tolerance
Time Frame: Baseline through one week
Pain tolerance refers to the maximum amount of pain produced by a stimulus that a person is able/willing to tolerate. Heat stimuli will again be delivered using the computer-controlled thermal stimulation system. From a baseline of 32 degrees Celsius, the probe temperature will increase at a rate of .5 degrees Celsius/second until the participant responds by pressing a button on a handheld device. For heat pain tolerance, participants will be instructed to press the button when they are "no longer willing to tolerate" the painful sensation. Pain rating scores will be reflected in scores of 0-100, 0 being the least amount of pain and 100 being the most amount of pain.
Baseline through one week
Temporal summation of pain
Time Frame: Baseline
Temporal summation of pain refers to a form of endogenous pain facilitation characterized by the perception of increased pain despite constant or even reduced peripheral afferent input. Temporal summation is presumed to be the psychophysical manifestation of wind-up. Wind-up is a phenomenon where repetitive stimulation of C primary afferents at rates greater than 0.3 Hertz produces a slowly increasing response of second-order neurons in the spinal cord. Pain rating scores will be reflected in scores of 0-100, 0 being the least amount of pain and 100 being the most amount of pain.
Baseline
Temporal summation of pain
Time Frame: Baseline through one week
Temporal summation of pain refers to a form of endogenous pain facilitation characterized by the perception of increased pain despite constant or even reduced peripheral afferent input. Temporal summation is presumed to be the psychophysical manifestation of wind-up. Wind-up is a phenomenon where repetitive stimulation of C primary afferents at rates greater than 0.3 Hertz produces a slowly increasing response of second-order neurons in the spinal cord. Pain rating scores will be reflected in scores of 0-100, 0 being the least amount of pain and 100 being the most amount of pain.
Baseline through one week
Conditioned pain modulation
Time Frame: Baseline
A routinely used quantitative sensory testing protocol for the measurement of endogenous pain inhibition is conditioned pain modulation, which refers to the reduction in pain from one stimulus (the test stimulus) produced by the application of a second pain stimulus at a remote body site (the conditioning stimulus). Conditioned pain modulation is believed to reflect the perceptual manifestation of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls, whereby ascending projections from one noxious stimulus activate supraspinal structures that trigger descending inhibitory projections to the dorsal horn. Pain rating scores will be reflected in scores of 0-100, 0 being the least amount of pain and 100 being the most amount of pain.
Baseline
Conditioned pain modulation
Time Frame: Baseline through one week
A routinely used quantitative sensory testing protocol for the measurement of endogenous pain inhibition is conditioned pain modulation, which refers to the reduction in pain from one stimulus (the test stimulus) produced by the application of a second pain stimulus at a remote body site (the conditioning stimulus). Conditioned pain modulation is believed to reflect the perceptual manifestation of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls, whereby ascending projections from one noxious stimulus activate supraspinal structures that trigger descending inhibitory projections to the dorsal horn. Pain rating scores will be reflected in scores of 0-100, 0 being the least amount of pain and 100 being the most amount of pain.
Baseline through one week
Suprathreshold pain response
Time Frame: Baseline
Ratings of pain in response to discrete stimuli with intensities above the pain threshold detection/ patients provide an intensity rating using any number of a 0-100 scale whereby 0=no pain and 100= the most intense pain imaginable
Baseline
Suprathreshold pain response
Time Frame: Baseline through one week
Ratings of pain in response to discrete stimuli with intensities above the pain threshold detection/ patients provide an intensity rating using any number of a 0-100 scale whereby 0=no pain and 100= the most intense pain imaginable
Baseline through one week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opioid Symptom Checklist
Time Frame: One to seven days post baseline
Lists True-False questions measuring opioid effects.
One to seven days post baseline
McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form
Time Frame: One to seven days post baseline
15 descriptors (11 sensory; 4 affective) using an intensity scaled ranging from 0-3 on pain. 0 being the least amount of pain and 3 being the most amount of pain.
One to seven days post baseline
26-item Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: One to seven days post baseline
Measures subjective and physiological effects of a medication using mood states as well as questions about the dose of medication.
One to seven days post baseline
Drug Effects Questionnaire-5
Time Frame: One to seven days post baseline
Assesses drug effects and uses VAS ratings from "Not at all" to "Very much."
One to seven days post baseline
26-item Visual Analog Scale ("Subjective drug effects")
Time Frame: One to seven days post baseline
This 26-item VAS measures subjective and physiological effects of a medication using mood states as well as questions about the dose of medication.
One to seven days post baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karen L Cropsey, Psy.D., University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 21, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Analgesia

Clinical Trials on Placebos

3
Subscribe